H.R. 226 - IRS tax credits for surrender of your guns

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Hopalong

    Man of Many Nicknames
    Jun 28, 2010
    2,921
    Howard County
    They really qualified a High-Point Carbine as an "assault weapon"?

    Good lord. At this point, "assault weapon" = semiautomatic rifle.
     

    WoJ

    Member
    Aug 1, 2012
    5
    Adams County, PA
    This has got to be the most ridiculous idea yet. We just ran a $1.1 TRILLION deficit last year and this nut wants Uncle Sugar to pay everyone $2000 for some old junker $200 Hi-Point.

    Search Google images for 'Rosa DeLauro'. Holy h*ll, she looks as nutty as she sounds.
     

    smores

    Creepy-Ass Cracker
    Feb 27, 2007
    13,493
    Falls Church
    This shows they're serious... they may back off for now but there will always be a concerted effort by the progressives to take our firearms.

    Anyone that thinks their "hunting" and "sporting" guns are safe needs a reality check...
     

    canuckboy

    Member
    Aug 27, 2010
    53
    This shows they're serious... they may back off for now but there will always be a concerted effort by the progressives to take our firearms.

    Anyone that thinks their "hunting" and "sporting" guns are safe needs a reality check...


    You are so right about that!
     

    randian

    Active Member
    Jan 13, 2012
    715
    If this passes, you won't be able to buy cheap hi-points and 10/22s. Minimum sales prices of all "assault weapons" (as defined) will skyrocket close to, you guessed it, $2k, just as happened with Cash for Clunkers.

    This is an excellent example of how to write a bill that has the effect of a ban, yet neither bans nor directly taxes an item, by making said item so expensive that most people can't afford one.

    You see the same effect from government deduction/credit programs for retrofitting things like air conditioning systems. A $1k credit guarantees A/C systems get $1k more expensive. It's not a benefit for the property owner, it's a disguised subsidy to the contractor.
     

    matt

    No one special
    Apr 9, 2011
    1,576
    You see the same effect from government deduction/credit programs for retrofitting things like air conditioning systems. A $1k credit guarantees A/C systems get $1k more expensive. It's not a benefit for the property owner, it's a disguised subsidy to the contractor.

    I wish "people" would understand that this is exactly how a gov can "control" [insert any or all of the following: liberty, property, trade, industries- ehh- f-it.] everything, with out the appearance of the "control". Only those with 2 things prevail- money or connections, and generally it takes one to get the other- specifically in this type of environment (control).

    Control the money- control. Really all that's left to take any semblance of liberty back is firearms, and they are trying like hell to control those (but we all see this.)
     

    Elliotte

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 11, 2011
    1,207
    Loudoun County VA
    I understand the mathematical logic of turning in a cheap qualifying firearm to get the tax credit, but I won't be turning in any of my firearms for 30 pieces of silver. These buybacks never get the firearms of criminals (or never prevent them from getting a new one), they only collect the firearms of the law-abiding.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,603
    Messages
    7,288,029
    Members
    33,487
    Latest member
    Mikeymike88

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom