Quantitative approach to picking a home defense gun

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Blaster229

    God loves you, I don't.
    MDS Supporter
    Sep 14, 2010
    46,604
    Glen Burnie
    I think that certain topics shouldn't even be allowed as a post anymore :)

    Beware of the man with 1 gun, because he probably knows how to use it.

    long guns are great if you never plan on having to use your support hand for anything like opening the door. They are great for huddling in the corner of your room waiting to utilize that beautiful fatal funnel of a bedroom door.
     

    fidelity

    piled higher and deeper
    MDS Supporter
    Aug 15, 2012
    22,400
    Frederick County
    I realize that it's marketing by the YouTuber, but I was annoyed that he labeled his approach as quantitative. He didn't provide data that he could argue to be objective in coming up with values in the different categories that he scored (it's a subjective opinion even with numbers ascribed to them) and what's to say each category (e.g. accuracy vs overpenetration) is of equivalent value in coming up with the aggregate score. I'm sure there are categories that one could also include. Broadly, one could reach similar conclusions without the pretense of doing a quantitative study.

    Personally, as Blaster noted, I'll simply stick with the firearm that I'm most familiar with and use the most (for me, it's a semi-automatic pistol - I'm not shooting anything at distance in the home). For a new shooter that won't spend much time at the range, I'll either train them with a Model 64 revolver if I want dead simple or a 10/22 rifle if they seem a bit more capable. They won't engage in house clearing, so having them understanding where are good points to fire a gun from and what to do when law enforcement arrives are things that I'd also want to cover.

    Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
     

    Biggfoot44

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 2, 2009
    33,252
    Is the video worth loosing my place in YouTube ? Or could someone do a direct thingie with it ?
     

    Slim

    Active Member
    Sep 13, 2015
    489
    HoCo & Worldwide
    Is the video worth loosing my place in YouTube ? Or could someone do a direct thingie with it ?

    I watched the whole thing. Worth a few minutes. I'd never heard of the guy until a week or so ago. He's had a few interesting videos.

    ... but I was annoyed that he labeled his approach as quantitative.
    True, it was opinion not objective fact, and he did try to explain how he assigned numbers to things, but it only really worked on magazine capacity.

    But at least it wasn't a fanboy video of the sort that usually fills up YouTube. Typically, there and in forums, someone purchases something, and because they don't want to return it, sell it, relegate it to the safe, admit it was a silly purchase, etc., they come up with some far-fetched justification as to why it's the best ever for X.

    I like that he explained pluses and minuses for the three platforms. But like Blaster229 said, not all home defense situations are the same. Urban apartment, vs. suburban house, vs. rural...
     

    Biggfoot44

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 2, 2009
    33,252
    The good news about his video - He introduces the concept that there are multiple factors in choosing a defensive tool , be it in the home or otherwise . And the factors should be carefully considered for each person before selecting/ aquiring .

    The bad news( plural ) about his video - Qualitative only in the sense of applying math to underlying wild supposition . No sense of weighting or prioritizing of any of the factors .

    I won't belabor point by point , but will point to a main theme of Blaster's post . ie Due to enherent nature of being inside a home , and the high likelihood of needing to do somthing important with one hand ( among other reasons ) , there is a blatently obvious choice for a singular default choice .

    A conventional sized handgun .

    There are techniques to mitigate the downsides of long guns , but there should be good specific reasons to not use a handgun , before giving serious consideration to anything else .
     

    pilot25

    Ultimate Member
    Jul 13, 2016
    1,822
    I realize that it's marketing by the YouTuber, but I was annoyed that he labeled his approach as quantitative. He didn't provide data that he could argue to be objective in coming up with values in the different categories that he scored (it's a subjective opinion even with numbers ascribed to them) and what's to say each category (e.g. accuracy vs overpenetration) is of equivalent value in coming up with the aggregate score. I'm sure there are categories that one could also include. Broadly, one could reach similar conclusions without the pretense of doing a quantitative study.

    Personally, as Blaster noted, I'll simply stick with the firearm that I'm most familiar with and use the most (for me, it's a semi-automatic pistol - I'm not shooting anything at distance in the home). For a new shooter that won't spend much time at the range, I'll either train them with a Model 64 revolver if I want dead simple or a 10/22 rifle if they seem a bit more capable. They won't engage in house clearing, so having them understanding where are good points to fire a gun from and what to do when law enforcement arrives are things that I'd also want to cover.

    Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk

    He explains its not exactly quantitative but to start a conversation.
     

    PJS

    Heavy
    Feb 4, 2014
    167
    Baltimore
    I get a kick out of John Lovell. Everyone comes with their particular paradigm. His background sure seems like it would have been rifle centric, and I'm going to guess that for him and his skill set, in his house, a rifle is best. I get the feeling the man has a pretty detailed plan.

    That said, it's obvious that every situation is different. A former US Army Ranger who teaches tactical firearms skills who lives in suburban Atlanta is likely not going to pick the same home defense weapon as a person who has never fired a rifle, fired a shotgun maybe twice, who owns handguns, has a CCW, and lives in a condo in Baltimore City.

    While I (the latter) might be considering a Mini-14 at some point, my go to home defense firearm is far more likely to be a handgun with a red dot and light on it than a semi-automatic rifle or shotgun.

    Best is always going to be an individual decision.
     

    fidelity

    piled higher and deeper
    MDS Supporter
    Aug 15, 2012
    22,400
    Frederick County
    He explains its not exactly quantitative but to start a conversation.
    As I said, it was a misrepresentation. He entitled the video as a quantitative approach. I almost stopped at the very beginning when I realized that it was a ploy (a common one on the internet to get page views, watches, ad dollars, etc). Only continued watching because you posted so I thought there might be something to learn.

    Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
     

    pilot25

    Ultimate Member
    Jul 13, 2016
    1,822
    Only continued watching because you posted so I thought there might be something to learn.

    Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk

    . Sorry. I thought it was interesting. Have been mulling over what to do about my wife who doesn't want to train but wants a firearm in the house. He addressed that exact thing at minute 7:00.
     

    TexDefender

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 28, 2017
    1,572
    All firearms can be used in the defense of you and your loved ones at home. Each situation is different. A pistol maybe more pragmatic, in the fact it is easy to conceal and carry in your home every minute of the day. But before the creation of the M4, and the utilization of collectable/folding stocks many US Military personnel cut their teeth on the M-16 in an urban environment, CQB, or MOUT. So those practices could be used in a home. I would say it is a lot easier to swing the tip around a wall if you are using it for concealment. A shotgun in a confined space, hallway, or stair case is lethal (assuming your a using the right ammo). The best weapon is the weapon you are, dare I say it, the most intimate with. I have no doubt this is one of the reasons why the AR platform gained such popularity. A weapon you have not train with, that you are not competent and confident with, is last one you want to resort too.

    For effective house defense, you and your family must have a plan. And should walk through that plan, just like any other emergency plan. What room should everyone fall back to? Who will call 911? What do you tell the police?
    Should you keep a lock cabinet upstairs with a rifle or shotgun in it? So my son can get to it. Should I have a small handgun safe on my nightstand by my bed at night? Should I buy that concealment shelf or table downstairs just in case? Should I carry indoors every day in my house? Where should I put my gun safe? In the living room, so it is hard to get out of the house or how about in the laundry room where it more out of sight?
     

    Biggfoot44

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 2, 2009
    33,252
    I agree, in the video he started with a preference for rifle, and set up the rest to plausibly justify it .

    Home Defense always inherently includes inside the homr, with short distances , hallways, doors, and furniture .

    Unless you have a compound with defense in depth , and full communications , and remote access control , you will have to contend with interactiond at your threshold with unknown persons or situations ,and it is both advantageous and polite to be able to be prepared discreetly .

    Of course single people who live alone also have rights to self defense , but discussion of Home Defense usually implies a context of a family, or at least spouse or SO . If potentially dealing with kids, spouses, roommates, etc either for rendering aid, shepparding them to relative safety, etc you will need the use of at least one free hand .

    Even if you do have 500yd free fire zone around your dwelling, you still have a baseline of Inside the home requirements . So if you are having only one, a Handgun still remains the heavily favored default choice .( Your Second HD firearm could be a rifle or shotgun as appropriate .)

    And again with the sexist cliches . My has been shooting since 8yo , and my daughter even younger, and they both have non-res CCW . It's Biggfootette who has to deal with non gun savvy boyfriends .
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,561
    Messages
    7,286,472
    Members
    33,477
    Latest member
    adamc904

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom