2015 Assault Weapons Ban Text

altima98 · Dec 27, 2015

Looks like Gun and Ammo sellers will have another banner year...

Vile Shadow · Dec 27, 2015

Dupe.

http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=186235

Vile Shadow · Dec 27, 2015

5cary said:
Maybe not this year....maybe not next year, but eventually they will get what they want. Guns are being vilified in our culture. We are a generation (or less) away from fruits of this stupidity.

The consequences remain to be seen.

They had it once for 10 years. It proved ineffective.

That's one bit of encouragement.

tball · Dec 27, 2015

Two of our MD representatives are co-sponsors of the bill.

Alea Jacta Est · Dec 27, 2015

Shocked and appalled...I am not.

rdc · Dec 27, 2015

Sling Blade said:
They had it once for 10 years. It proved ineffective.

That's one bit of encouragement.

They don't care about effectiveness. They only care about "doing something.™"

INMY01TA · Dec 27, 2015

Good lord, is there anying they left out?

Vile Shadow · Dec 27, 2015

pbharvey said:
The title of the bill makes perfect sense

engineerbrian said:
When i read that last night it stuck out for me too. Funny thing is the right to keep and bear arms is already limited.

pbharvey said:
The fact that it was even drafted is troubling

Drafted by those who in their own delusions have no idea that it is THEY whom the 2nd Amendment was written to protect from, while they pontificate how it's all about hunting and shooting at flying orange disks. :rolleyes:

Vile Shadow · Dec 27, 2015

INMY01TA said:
Good lord, is there anying they left out?

Had to inprove on the Frankenfeinstein version.

dist1646 · Dec 27, 2015

If this should ever pass, let the revolution begin!

Ellegon · Dec 27, 2015

Easy work around...If Bruce Jenner can put on a dress and call himself Caitlyn, I can put a compass in the stock of my AR and call it a Daisy Red Ryder BB gun....same logic liberals use ! ! !

Rick3bears · Dec 27, 2015

Not much chance of passing in 2016. It's an election year and the Congressp*ssies won't take a chance on upsetting the NRA or the millions of gun owners. They just sign on to look good to the media and not draw attention to being "pro-gun". The bill will probably die in Committee and have to be re-submitted next session.

Alea Jacta Est · Dec 27, 2015

Ellegon said:
Easy work around...If Bruce Jenner can put on a dress and call himself Caitlyn, I can put a compass in the stock of my AR and call it a Daisy Red Ryder BB gun....same logic liberals use ! ! !

You are demonstrating some serious potential...

The sphinx · Dec 27, 2015

Rick3bears said:
Not much chance of passing in 2016. It's an election year and the Congressp*ssies won't take a chance on upsetting the NRA or the millions of gun owners. They just sign on to look good to the media and not draw attention to being "pro-gun". The bill will probably die in Committee and have to be re-submitted next session.

This 100%! I completely think that's what will happen.

protegeV · Dec 27, 2015

BossmanPJ · Dec 27, 2015

Unreal. Thy didn't leave many things out of that one.

I truly cannot believe that even a heat shield on a shotgun is proposed to be banned. WTF is wrong with these idiots? It literally spells out that it is a safety device to prevent the user from burning themselves. And that is an evil feature? Give me a break.

protegeV · Dec 27, 2015

BossmanPJ said:
Unreal. Thy didn't leave many things out of that one.

I truly cannot believe that even a heat shield on a shotgun is proposed to be banned. WTF is wrong with these idiots? It literally spells out that it is a safety device to prevent the user from burning themselves. And that is an evil feature? Give me a break.

The liberal focus group just picked everything that looked "scary" :rolleyes:

LeadSled1 · Dec 27, 2015

Notice the severability clause at the very end. If parts are found unconstitutional only those parts are removed. They are pushing a unconstitutional law hoping for years of fights in the courts, and then only small parts can be fought.

The devil is in the details:

46) The term ‘pistol grip’ means a grip, a thumbhole stock, or any other characteristic that can function as a grip.

A) A semiautomatic rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and any 1 of the following:

“(i) A pistol grip.

A semiautomatic shotgun that has any 1 of the following:

ii) A pistol grip.

Every firearm has a characteristic that can function as a grip. It must have that in order to hold it. It becomes a defacto ban on all semi-auto long guns.

Also notice the list of exempted firearms that are non-semiauto. If the ban does not impact single shot, pump, or lever action why do they need an exemption?

Minuteman · Dec 27, 2015

9rGpykAX1fo

mikemike328 · Dec 27, 2015

very sad what this country has turn into.

2015 Assault Weapons Ban Text

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

Active Member

...

...

Ultimate Member

Extinguished member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

...

...

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Grumpy Old Coot

Extinguished member

Ultimate Member

Ready to go

Ultimate Member

Ready to go

Ultimate Member

Member

Active Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics