HBAR profile caliber specific?
- Thread starter protegeV
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
MSP told me they are considering any AR not in 5.56/.223 to be not a clone and not banned.
Ok thanks. That's all I wanted to know. I think it just goes to show how dumb the laws are. The whole ban happened bc of "looks." I find it hilarious that you can still legally buy an ar with a pencil barrel that shoot AK ammo after they "banned" both the one version of the ar and all versions of the ak(except for pistols) 
Aren't liberals brilliant?
NateIU10
Ultimate Member
Not really. All non-556 guns are being sold C&C right now, even if the lower is the same. The 762x39 Windham is legal (even MSP agrees on that one) and the lower is the same, even though the upper its sold with has an M4 cutout.
I know they're only the enforcement but do you think msp realizes how asinine the whole thing is?
The law was suppose to ban scary looking guns but all it really did was effect the part of the gun you can't see.
I don't disagree. Just get them while you can. Might change on a whim. And understand that putting a .223/5.56 upper on said lower is a felony (for other people's reference, not yours).
- Nov 14, 2010
- 20,274
Incrementalism ... The gun-grabber's tool in trade.
Foretold is forewarned, especially if AG Frosh has his way.
Municipalities have rights?
Wow, she must have failed civics I guess.
so typical.
Wow, she must have failed civics I guess.
so typical.
Even more onerous for us. Incrementalism against a natural right by way of regulation instead of by law. Liberty turned on its head.
- Jul 29, 2014
- 50,063
She knows. As with all ''those'', we're just a bunch of ignorant idiots.
- Nov 14, 2010
- 20,274
This is something that needs to be addressed with the Governor and Legislature.
By delegating firearm rules making to the MSP and COMAR, our constitutional rights have been subverted. Nothing new here in the PRofMD though; just look at the budget battle going on right now. Hogan is up against 'formula tax increases' that are basically controlled by the agencies that will benefit the most. Manipulate the data, get a budget increase. It's no different with COMAR when adding 'other' calibers to the HBAR definition. It's within MSP's delegated power to make that determination, and unless the Governor and the new MSP superintendent (whenever he/she is appointed and confirmed) puts their foot down, it will most likely happen.
If you put an HBAR upper on it, it is not a felony. The AR -15 ban is NOT caliber specific.
There are shops that will not sell non .223 as C&C.
But I think Colt only made 5.56 and 9mm. So you could argue that any other caliber is not a Colt AR15
Vile Shadow
...
- Feb 28, 2013
- 28,953
Same story all the time. Symbolism over substance.
Yes. To be a considered a copy, it would have to be the caliber. Otherwise, the parts wouldn't swap out.
BUFF7MM
☠Buff➐㎣☠
I don't think any caliber needs to be stamped HBAR to be an HBAR, it's the O.D. of the barrel that makes it an HBAR.
300 BLK barrels are HB even if not marked.
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
-
-
-
Looking for light 9mm suppressor suggestions
- Started by John from MD
- Replies: 0
-
