PowPow
Where's the beef?
The original 12 amendments that came out with SB208 had $30. They amended it back to reasonable fee on the floor yesterday.
HB0004 Rifles and Shotguns - Secondary Transactions
- Thread starter PowPow
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
The original 12 amendments that came out with SB208 had $30. They amended it back to reasonable fee on the floor yesterday.
PowPow
Where's the beef?
I missed this. The 3/3 JPR committee vote on HB4 fav w/amendments was 6-5 with Sen. West casting the Yea vote. Sens. Smith and Young voted Nay.
That means that HB4 continues on its path because of Sen. West.
That means that HB4 continues on its path because of Sen. West.
knovotny
Active Member
Wow
Hope anyone that had nice things to say about him takes then back.
He really is a piece of shit.
PowPow
Where's the beef?
It appears (based on the agenda) that HB4 and SB208 will not be on the Senate floor today. I'm going to listen to the session and will report if I hear anything. They normally don't discuss something that's not on the agenda unless it's an emergency.
If you're curious, I've had to stay home from work yesterday and today to wrangle our homeschooled son. My wife is out of town.
If you're curious, I've had to stay home from work yesterday and today to wrangle our homeschooled son. My wife is out of town.
I have nothing good to say bout Young - he likely took political air cover with his Nay vote cuz he knew WEST was voting Yea....
Edited - corrected Yea voting Sen...
PowPow
Where's the beef?
.
Last edited:
PowPow
Where's the beef?
Senate adjourned until Monday night 3/9, 8pm. Senate JPR committee will be having a voting session shortly.
Overwatch326
Active Member
- Aug 13, 2016
- 370
Man, I am getting real tired of seeing that witch Atrerbeary's name. I was happily ignorant of this person's existence before this year.
Hypothetical question, though: Say I and my buddy meet just over the state line in WV. I gift my non-regulated shotgun to him there, making him the lawful owner, fill out and sign a dated receipt, and snap a selfie to show we were there.
Since he's now the lawful owner of the non-regulated firearm, and it was conducted in a state without this abortion of justice they call law, and we have proof we were there... How can they enforce this?
Like I stated in a previous thread, even with selling a regulated firearm out of state, MSP doesn't care as long as it's out of the state, but if it's not regulated, how can they stop us from bringing it back in, just under a different owner?
TLDR; If you sell a buddy a non-regulated gun in another state, making them the owner there and keeping proof to back it up, can the idiots in Annapolis claim you broke the law?
Hypothetical question, though: Say I and my buddy meet just over the state line in WV. I gift my non-regulated shotgun to him there, making him the lawful owner, fill out and sign a dated receipt, and snap a selfie to show we were there.
Since he's now the lawful owner of the non-regulated firearm, and it was conducted in a state without this abortion of justice they call law, and we have proof we were there... How can they enforce this?
Like I stated in a previous thread, even with selling a regulated firearm out of state, MSP doesn't care as long as it's out of the state, but if it's not regulated, how can they stop us from bringing it back in, just under a different owner?
TLDR; If you sell a buddy a non-regulated gun in another state, making them the owner there and keeping proof to back it up, can the idiots in Annapolis claim you broke the law?
Last edited:
You just violated federal law, since you are a Maryland resident and performed a firearms transfer in another state without using a dealer.
Overwatch326
Active Member
- Aug 13, 2016
- 370
Ahh, right.
Not sure how I forgot about the federal side of it, ridiculous as it is that where I'm from versus where I am makes a difference as to what I do with my own property. Dang, I'm so used to MGA'S *cough*unconstitutional*cough* laws being so assininely inept that there's a glaring legal way around it. 
The question is what those amendments were. SB208 started out identical to HB0004, and was amended to remove the loan language, among other things. If those amendments bring HB0004 in line with what SB208 is, then JPC passing it isn't that big a deal.
But that's only if it was amended to bring it into line with SB0208. And we won't know that until 2nd Reader, IIRC.
PowPow
Where's the beef?
Does not include temporary gratuitous exchange of a shotgun or rifle. Am I reading that correctly?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
PowPow
Where's the beef?
Yes, you are.
daggo66
Ultimate Member
Even if they are both residents of the same state?
I’m sorry, but ANY anti gun bill or amendment in said bills IS a big deal. That’s why Maryland is such a anti gun s$i+ hole because many gun owners are ok with continually “compromising”.
whistlersmother
Peace through strength
Still 5 year, $10000 penalty?
I thought that was reduced to be less than stealing firearm?
I thought that was reduced to be less than stealing firearm?
PowPow
Where's the beef?
The remaining 5 years is for knowingly loaning to someone who would use it to do harm. 6 months & $10K for not doing a background check for a sale/transfer. IANAL
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
Hair-trigger posting... please include more than just the "headline"- Started by Mr H
- Replies: 11
-
-
-
(Duplicate - mods please close) MoCo trans student arrested for threatening school- Started by Lafayette
- Replies: 2
-
