i truly am behind enemy lines
Nah, you're among friends
Just messing with boricuamaximus' MoCo refined Elite
i truly am behind enemy lines
I agree. The MoCo types are much more refined than any of them southern boys.
We get manicures, have poodles named fluffy, believe Barb Mikluski is our deity and we only eat an organic vegan diet. We are also the founders of the PRICK movement (Prius Driving Inspirational Conglomerate of Kinsmen)
"Sacramento County Sheriff John McGinness has modified his handgun carry permitting policy, prompting two Second Amendment advocacy groups to drop their lawsuit against the county and its top law enforcement official."
"The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and the Calguns Foundation dismissed their case after McGinness changed the law to state that self-defense is a valid reason to issue a gun carry permit. The organizations will, however, continue their legal battle against Yolo County and its sheriff in an attempt to change their policy." ...
but...I would like to have the ability to put a "regulated" arm in my vehicle (hidden and secured) for instances of defense when my handgun isn't enough to get me home.
I'm assuming the "this will eventually go for rifles" is not about Patrick's wife (don't mess with her) but about Open Carrying of Rifles??
I believe this is currently a valid legal gray area in MD. A former sage here suggested such, that the prohibitions on carry are pertinent for handguns and do not reference rifles.
Other questions such as to/from the range and doing it on foot or a bicycle while carrying your arms are another gray area as it doesn't reference vehicles, only transport....
In another year, it would be worth testing the waters on this one in MD. Remember the gent in AZ with an AR on his back while the President was in town a year or so ago? This is not outside the norm of the "main stream" states.
It would be fun (someday) to park a mile from Sanners and walk the remaining distance with my Remington over my shoulder...I'm all about exploring the boundaries, however I'll just wait until one or two cases are under our belt...
I'll have to dig up the various statutes pertaining first...
The transport restrictions apply to handguns,(and sbs/sbrs) not "regulated" firearms. Carry away!
A wellpublicizedfunded open carry rifle & shotgun luncheon meeting at a gun rights friendly restaurant?
Closer to the truth.
You poke the tiger, you get bit.
The transport restrictions apply to handguns,(and sbs/sbrs) not "regulated" firearms. Carry away!
I'm all for the idea and this is something for a different thread, but I would want an MSI or 2A savvy attorney on speed dial before this went down...
Me neither...only once our right has been fully made available to us, and NOT for political statements.Not me, but have a blast. I don't see need to draw odd attention to ourselves at this time. Not sure what positive value it would have.
Not starting a flame (or another thread -- let someone else do that), just stating a minor opinion.
All that (little bit) said, I'd love to see the outcome.
We continue to wait.
We continue to wait.
and wait.
you know, im surprised that a state doesnt fall on its sword to keep it from becoming Constitutional law.
because they honestly think they can win and possibly to make discretionary permits the supreme law of the land.
Granted, to the rest of us this makes as much sense as Pelosi saying even Mon and Tues that "I think we are in a great position to keep the house".