Clarify all of this nonsense for because it is starting to run together. If passed, would this mean that I couldn’t loan my wife or kids firearms to shoot at the range?
The Democrats are moving HB96...
- Thread starter Delegate Robin Grammer
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Clarify all of this nonsense for because it is starting to run together. If passed, would this mean that I couldn’t loan my wife or kids firearms to shoot at the range?
Not odd at all given that it was just voted out of committee today. The Amendment, the vote on the amendment, and the updated bill will be posted in the next day or so. That is business as usual.
esqappellate
President, MSI
- Feb 12, 2012
- 7,408
Such possession by a person under the age of 21 for shooting a handgun in the presence of an instructor or parent or other person over the age of 21 is expressly permitted by MD Code Public Safety § 5-133(d). I think you are protected by that very specific provision.
danb
dont be a dumbass
See SB436. Amendment is posted. Appears to me to line up with the OPs post.
Cant say about the prior screen names, but the info looks accurate to me. Gotta wear a thick skin around here to deal with the tinfoil.
Cant say about the prior screen names, but the info looks accurate to me. Gotta wear a thick skin around here to deal with the tinfoil.
danb
dont be a dumbass
See SB436. Amendment is posted. Appears to me to line up with the OPs post.
Cant say about the prior screen names, but the info looks accurate to me. Gotta wear a thick skin around here to deal with the tinfoil.
Cant say about the prior screen names, but the info looks accurate to me. Gotta wear a thick skin around here to deal with the tinfoil.
PowPow
Where's the beef?
Trust but verified is operative here, not tinfoil. The OP was never officially verified by anyone to my knowledge.
esqappellate
President, MSI
- Feb 12, 2012
- 7,408
We are fine with sb346 as thus amended. The hearing on this bill really paid off
Lest we forget about the Boy Scouts that have trained young men in shooting with Rifle and Shotgun merit badge and went on to serve in the military.
danb
dont be a dumbass
When it comes to low post count newbs during the silly season, we do have a tendency to shoot first second and third, then as questions later. "Is this HBAR legal..."
...Until they pass the bill that makes our rifles, shotguns, and virtually anything that goes boom - REGULATED. Which is being attempted with long guns with detachable magazines, isn’t it?
Bigtex
Member
Delegate Grammers, thank you! I spoke at the house committee on the 25th. And the “transfer” law they were proposing seemed MUCH different. This pretty much reads the way the law is and purchasing restrictions currently. Am i missing something?
- May 22, 2005
- 122,883
There's no question he has another account here.
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
The Economic Impact of the Firearm and Ammunition Industry (3 Viewers)- Started by Target Sports USA
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
-
