Go Back   Maryland Shooters > Gun Rights and Legislation > Maryland 2A Issues
Don't Have An Account? Register Here

Join MD Shooters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old September 15th, 2018, 08:50 AM #21
Luigi2020's Avatar
Luigi2020 Luigi2020 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Kingsville, MD
Posts: 26
Luigi2020 Luigi2020 is offline
Junior Member
Luigi2020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Kingsville, MD
Posts: 26
Sending it in.

Last edited by Luigi2020; September 15th, 2018 at 08:55 AM. Reason: Correction of error
Luigi2020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 15th, 2018, 09:55 AM #22
Allen65 Allen65 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Anne Arundel County
Posts: 643
Allen65 Allen65 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Anne Arundel County
Posts: 643
If oil can be considered as a trigger accelerator, I guess I need to send in a letter to ATF requesting permission to keep a quart can of...ATF.
Allen65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 15th, 2018, 10:16 AM #23
Mark75H's Avatar
Mark75H Mark75H is offline
Outboard boat racing guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Outside the Gates
Posts: 10,352
Send a message via AIM to Mark75H
Mark75H Mark75H is offline
Outboard boat racing guy
Mark75H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Outside the Gates
Posts: 10,352
Send a message via AIM to Mark75H
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen65 View Post
If oil can be considered as a trigger accelerator, I guess I need to send in a letter to ATF requesting permission to keep a quart can of...ATF.
If you own ANY firearm in MD, yes, you need to send the letter for permission to keep the quart of ATF
__________________
2A ... Federal Preemption

Thus, the only inquiry that this Court should conduct is to determine whether the firearms prohibited by the Act are protected by the Second Amendment. Because they are, the Act is simply unconstitutional.
Mark75H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 15th, 2018, 11:13 AM #24
vgplayer vgplayer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Southern Maryland - King George Bound
Posts: 877
vgplayer vgplayer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Southern Maryland - King George Bound
Posts: 877
Maximum BGOS engaged....
vgplayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 15th, 2018, 11:15 AM #25
IronEye IronEye is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Howard County
Posts: 206
IronEye IronEye is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Howard County
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen65 View Post
If oil can be considered as a trigger accelerator, I guess I need to send in a letter to ATF requesting permission to keep a quart can of...ATF.
Permission from ATF to have ATF. I see what you did there.
IronEye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 15th, 2018, 11:26 AM #26
moparmike610's Avatar
moparmike610 moparmike610 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Hughesville
Posts: 110
moparmike610 moparmike610 is offline
Member
moparmike610's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Hughesville
Posts: 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by babalou View Post
this is my original email and the reply

From: FIPB.Regulatory.Email.Inquiries@usdoj.gov [mailto:FIPB.Regulatory.Email.Inquiries@usdoj.gov]
Sent: Fri 8/31/2018 1:50 PM
To: Greg
Subject: RE: binary trigger/rapid fire trigger


Good afternoon sir,



ATF's position regarding Maryland’s new law is posted on our public website in a Special Advisory issued by our Office of Public Affairs. I have included a hyperlink to the advisory for your convenience below.



https://www.atf.gov/news/pr/maryland...ger-activators



I trust this advisory clarifies ATF’s authority, however please let us know if we can be of further assistance by contacting us at (202)648-7120 or FIPB@atf.gov.



Regards,

R. Lawrence

Firearms Enforcement Specialist

Firearms Industry Programs Branch



From: Greg <greg@xxxx.xxx>
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2018 1:24 PM
To: FIPB.Regulatory.Email.Inquiries@usdoj.gov
Subject: binary trigger/rapid fire trigger



To whom it may concern,

I would like to apply with the BATFE for authorization to posses a rapid fire trigger activator as mandated by the state of Maryland before the October 1st 2018 deadline as to be in compliance with the new senate bill 707 written into law earlier this year.

Thank you,

Just reading from the ATF link it basically states they won’t give permission, so why are we sending letters to them again?? Little confused as to what this letter will do for us.
__________________
Keeping you cool year round “chiller mechanic life”
VA non resident cc
Maryland collector
moparmike610 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 15th, 2018, 11:31 AM #27
squaregrouper's Avatar
squaregrouper squaregrouper is offline
Vote SG For King
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pikesville, Peoples Republik Of Marylandistan
Posts: 7,791
Images: 1
squaregrouper squaregrouper is offline
Vote SG For King
squaregrouper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pikesville, Peoples Republik Of Marylandistan
Posts: 7,791
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by moparmike610 View Post
Just reading from the ATF link it basically states they won’t give permission, so why are we sending letters to them again?? Little confused as to what this letter will do for us.
Yesterday the judge stated that simply applying to The ATF keeps you legal until 10/1/2019. It will cost you a stamp and 5 minutes of your time.
If you previously sent a letter requesting permission, disregard.
__________________
Nothing posted on this forum should be considered legal advice. If you are in need of legal advice, I advise you to seek your own counsel. Hell, I'm not even a lawyer, but this got your attention.
squaregrouper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 15th, 2018, 12:10 PM #28
DC-W's Avatar
DC-W DC-W is offline
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 21,144
DC-W DC-W is offline
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
DC-W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 21,144
Sent my letter certfied this morning and I encourage you all to do so as well.
DC-W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 15th, 2018, 12:32 PM #29
vgplayer vgplayer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Southern Maryland - King George Bound
Posts: 877
vgplayer vgplayer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Southern Maryland - King George Bound
Posts: 877
This forum is seen by an incredibly small number of MD gun owners. I'd be surprised if ATF receives 50 letters, of which they will send back 0 approved letters. Then what.....

This is a tiny echo chamber. Most MD gun owners have no idea that a bump stock bill passed, hell probably didn't know one was introduced.
vgplayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 15th, 2018, 12:36 PM #30
swinokur's Avatar
swinokur swinokur is offline
In a State of Denial
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Gulag Montgomery
Posts: 43,153
swinokur swinokur is offline
In a State of Denial
swinokur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Gulag Montgomery
Posts: 43,153
As stated no approval required. Only proof that you applied per the Federal Judge.

Bet that frosted Frosh too!
__________________
swinokur is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Home Page > Forum List > Gun Rights and Legislation > Maryland 2A Issues

Tags
activator, atf, bafte, bogos, bump stock, rapid fire, sb707


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2018, Congregate Media, LP Privacy Policy Terms of Service