300 blk

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • smokey

    2A TEACHER
    Jan 31, 2008
    31,508

    Attachments

    • 412260_343799122333216_617473682_o.jpg
      412260_343799122333216_617473682_o.jpg
      92.9 KB · Views: 264

    quad

    Another Hooligan
    Mar 31, 2011
    890
    Allegany County
    Just an update...ended up going with a 300blk with a 10.5 inch barrel. I think I’m gonna really like it. I love my 10.5 inch 5.56. Thanks to all for the advice and help.
     

    WildWeasel

    Active Member
    Mar 31, 2019
    468
    MI>FL>MD

    Great info.

    And this is where I call :bs: on a 300BLK not being accurate. I parked 3 consecutive though the same hole at 100 yards. My friends were on the spotting scopes, watching me shoot. I actually walked the rounds around on the target, so the spotters could see the impacts on target. But then again, I built my AR's, so I accurize them during the build process. Do you build and accurize?

    https://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=213710

    If you don't feel like scrolling through the whole thread, I'll give you some highlight posts.
    https://www.mdshooters.com/showpost.php?p=4896191&postcount=12
    https://www.mdshooters.com/showpost.php?p=4896221&postcount=14
    https://www.mdshooters.com/showpost.php?p=4896240&postcount=19

    For some reason, I'm being denied access to these links. New membership/ low post count?

    Build, yes. Accurize, no. Between GI/mid grade parts and the distances I usually shoot, I didn't see it as worth the extra time or money to squeeze out all the slop. Although with good factory loads or my reloads, my 556 is subMOA, and just a bit over with ball ammo. Still working on finding the best factory load, and ultimately reloads, for my .300. Top of my head, I think maybe 1.75-2 MOA is about what I was getting, and that's about what a few friends and family were seeing. Can it be better? Absolutely. Time, money, tinkering, and practice all can improve accuracy. I'm not saying .300 is inaccurate either; just from what I've experienced, seen, and read, BLK is usually not as accurate as other rounds. All this said, a good gun and a good shell will certainly outperform me...

    What are your accurizing procedures and parts list? Maybe a really nice target HBAR is in my future... :D
     

    outrider58

    Eats Bacon Raw
    MDS Supporter
    Jul 29, 2014
    49,995
    And this is where I call :bs: on a 300BLK not being accurate. I parked 3 consecutive though the same hole at 100 yards. My friends were on the spotting scopes, watching me shoot. I actually walked the rounds around on the target, so the spotters could see the impacts on target. But then again, I built my AR's, so I accurize them during the build process. Do you build and accurize?

    https://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=213710

    If you don't feel like scrolling through the whole thread, I'll give you some highlight posts.
    https://www.mdshooters.com/showpost.php?p=4896191&postcount=12
    https://www.mdshooters.com/showpost.php?p=4896221&postcount=14
    https://www.mdshooters.com/showpost.php?p=4896240&postcount=19
    I remember that day. I also remember putting three rounds in the same with my 300blk SBR

    Great info.



    For some reason, I'm being denied access to these links. New membership/ low post count?

    Build, yes. Accurize, no. Between GI/mid grade parts and the distances I usually shoot, I didn't see it as worth the extra time or money to squeeze out all the slop. Although with good factory loads or my reloads, my 556 is subMOA, and just a bit over with ball ammo. Still working on finding the best factory load, and ultimately reloads, for my .300. Top of my head, I think maybe 1.75-2 MOA is about what I was getting, and that's about what a few friends and family were seeing. Can it be better? Absolutely. Time, money, tinkering, and practice all can improve accuracy. I'm not saying .300 is inaccurate either; just from what I've experienced, seen, and read, BLK is usually not as accurate as other rounds. All this said, a good gun and a good shell will certainly outperform me...

    What are your accurizing procedures and parts list? Maybe a really nice target HBAR is in my future... :D

    Yeah. Post count i guess, assuming for some reason that thread was in the "Water Cooler" where you must have >50 post to gain access.
     

    DaemonAssassin

    Why should we Free BSD?
    Jun 14, 2012
    23,994
    Political refugee in WV
    Great info.



    For some reason, I'm being denied access to these links. New membership/ low post count?

    Build, yes. Accurize, no. Between GI/mid grade parts and the distances I usually shoot, I didn't see it as worth the extra time or money to squeeze out all the slop. Although with good factory loads or my reloads, my 556 is subMOA, and just a bit over with ball ammo. Still working on finding the best factory load, and ultimately reloads, for my .300. Top of my head, I think maybe 1.75-2 MOA is about what I was getting, and that's about what a few friends and family were seeing. Can it be better? Absolutely. Time, money, tinkering, and practice all can improve accuracy. I'm not saying .300 is inaccurate either; just from what I've experienced, seen, and read, BLK is usually not as accurate as other rounds. All this said, a good gun and a good shell will certainly outperform me...

    What are your accurizing procedures and parts list? Maybe a really nice target HBAR is in my future... :D

    A well built 300BLK is incredibly accurate. During the build process, if you don't take the time to eliminate the "slop", then you are doing the platform and cartridges you shoot a huge disservice. Using quality components and building the AR properly is the difference between a sub-MOA gun and a 2-5 MOA gun. I've also built 556 AR's that almost rival my Shilen barreled AR for accuracy at 100 yards.

    I built a 300BLK for a friend of mine to go deer hunting and that rifle is sub-MOA all day long with good ammo. That rifle is using a barrel that runs 100 bucks from the manufacturer. But the pics are from my rifle.

    20 rounds at 50 yards by one of the guys that was spotting for me. He hadn't shot an AR/M16 since he was in the military back in the late 70's or early 80's.

    liOH3oj.jpg


    8 rounds at 100 yards by me. Shot in the black was my first shot at 100 and I called it as a flier as soon as the trigger broke.

    31ccde9068b72e85886e25486e10ee6c.jpg


    The platform.

    ebe06fe4b621ad5bf84be2d2f3dfab6d.jpg


    How do I accurize? Not to let all the secrets out of the box, but I use a lapping tool on every upper, that I build. There are other things that you can do to accurize the platform and none of them involve using a accu-wedge or other gimmick. Take a SOTAR build class to find out more.

    Upper Receiver
    https://www.primaryarms.com/anderso...lat-top-upper-receiver-assembly-ar15-a3-upper


    Charging handle - pick one, depending on what you want to do

    G.I.
    https://www.primaryarms.com/anderson-manufacturing-ar-15-charging-handle

    Ambi
    https://www.primaryarms.com/radian-weapons-ar15-m16-raptor-ambidextrous-charging-handle-black


    BCG
    https://www.joeboboutfitters.com/To...Carrier-Group-AR15-M-p/tool-tooauto-011bn.htm

    16" Barrel
    https://www.kakindustry.com/ar-15-p...h/contract-300-16-inch-pistol-melonite-barrel

    Handguard
    If you are using the 16" rifle barrel, get the 13" handguard.
    https://www.strikeindustries.com/sh...guard-rail-g2-7-9-10-12-13-15-12-5-fsp-c.html


    Muzzle device
    https://www.midwayusa.com/product/8...e-5-8-24-thread-ar-10-lr-308-steel-parkerized


    Gas Block
    https://www.primaryarms.com/radical-firearms-low-profile-gas-block-750-set-screw-style


    Gas Tube
    https://www.primaryarms.com/expo-arms-pistol-length-gas-tube-stainless-steel


    Lower Parts

    LPK no trigger
    https://www.primaryarms.com/aero-precision-ar-15-moe-lower-parts-kit-minus-fcg-black


    Trigger
    https://www.primaryarms.com/alg-defense-quality-milspec-trigger-qms


    Stock hardware kit w/M4 stock
    https://www.primaryarms.com/ds-arms-mil-spec-stock-hardware-kit-with-m4-stock-zm48988-a

    Side note for you. Stop using GI parts for everything. GI triggers just suck. Same thing with GI charging handles and stocks. It costs a bit more in the short term, but the end result changes the whole platform in ways that are more than just the aesthetics.
     

    DaemonAssassin

    Why should we Free BSD?
    Jun 14, 2012
    23,994
    Political refugee in WV
    I remember that day. I also remember putting three rounds in the same with my 300blk SBR



    Yeah. Post count i guess, assuming for some reason that thread was in the "Water Cooler" where you must have >50 post to gain access.

    It was a good day. :D

    Our RSO friend was very chill and relaxed, while we were following the range rules. :lol2:
     

    OLM-Medic

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    May 5, 2010
    6,588
    For those of you who have a 16" and something like a 8" suppressed, have you noticed any significant difference in sound reduction in the longer barrels?
     

    holesonpaper

    Active Member
    Mar 10, 2017
    924
    Hazzard county
    I have a 16” and 10.5” and there might be a little difference between but not a ton although I’ll be honest, I don’t compare the decibels side by side.
     

    outrider58

    Eats Bacon Raw
    MDS Supporter
    Jul 29, 2014
    49,995
    I have not noticed a discernable difference in 5.56, but that is not shooting subsonic.
     
    Last edited:

    WildWeasel

    Active Member
    Mar 31, 2019
    468
    MI>FL>MD
    Thanks for all the info. After buying and trying a GI trigger for my first rifle, to include filing and polishing it, I threw it out. Not worth the money or time... But it's that first rifle (556) that shoots sub moa, in spite of the chrome lined, non free floated barrel, standard BCG, receiver slop, etc. Next time I take the BLK to the range, I'll make sure to document it all, take my time, save targets, and do a range report. The lower is all RRA (yeah I know they've done some dumb stuff lately...), with their 2 stage trigger, and it's really a tight fit to the upper. I can't recall brand on the upper ATM but it's a 16" free floated barrel (HBAR of course...) so as long as that's halfway decent, it checks most of the boxes for what should be a fairly accurate gun. FWIW, that lower shoots great on the 556. So the likely culprits are the upper, the shells, or me...

    We'll see. But honestly, even if it only ends up being a 1.5-2 MOA rifle, I'd still be happy. The super and subsonic options are great, it hits like an AK in an AR format, and I'll have a great reason to buy or build a subMOA rifle...
     

    outrider58

    Eats Bacon Raw
    MDS Supporter
    Jul 29, 2014
    49,995
    I built my 300blk with accuracy being an absolute priority. It turned out to be a sub 1/2 moa gun. It is possible and for me, to be expected. As others have said, don't build cheap and learn the various methods required for building an accurate AR 15. You'll end up with a pile of them lol.
     

    Park ranger

    Ultimate Member
    Dec 6, 2015
    2,327
    Why get caught up in sub MOA in a blackout? It's a 200 yard gun, realistically. 1 moa is fine. Plus, that probably off a bench? Shoot it offhand at 100 and see that gun go to a 10 MOA gun.
     

    outrider58

    Eats Bacon Raw
    MDS Supporter
    Jul 29, 2014
    49,995
    Why get caught up in sub MOA in a blackout? It's a 200 yard gun, realistically. 1 moa is fine. Plus, that probably off a bench? Shoot it offhand at 100 and see that gun go to a 10 MOA gun.

    I'm not caught up on anything other than building an accurate gun. My point was, have higher expectations. Got a problem with that? I was just trying to tell WildWeasel that he can have higher expectations out of a 300 AAC. It really is a short distance round. Why not take it to its its fullest capability?

    FWIW, the round was designed to kill people at very close range. It is, as I previously stated, a niche round.

    ETA Sorry. I was having a crappy day which end with my boss dropping a fork from our forklift on my bad foot.
    :beer:
     
    Last edited:

    DaemonAssassin

    Why should we Free BSD?
    Jun 14, 2012
    23,994
    Political refugee in WV
    Why get caught up in sub MOA in a blackout? It's a 200 yard gun, realistically. 1 moa is fine. Plus, that probably off a bench? Shoot it offhand at 100 and see that gun go to a 10 MOA gun.

    :rolleyes:

    Who took away your cup of coffee and replaced it with Sanka?

    It isn't a 200 yards gun, it can actually be a 400-500 yard gun, if built properly. The bullet has the same energy at 500 yards, that a 45ACP has at the muzzle of a 1911. You just have to know how to utilize the platform to get those kinds of legs on it. But then again, I did all of the ballistic research to know all of that, because I reload and need that information, should I ever have to take a shot beyond 100 yards.
     

    calicojack

    American Sporting Rifle
    MDS Supporter
    May 29, 2018
    5,390
    Cuba on the Chesapeake

    Park ranger

    Ultimate Member
    Dec 6, 2015
    2,327
    All I'm saying is the blackout is darn near a 30-30. I've had many of bang flops with a 110 at 2400 fps at 25-40 yards. But nevertheless, it is slow, so it's going to drop and drift A LOT. And I'm my opinion, muzzle energy of a 45ACP isn't much to sing about.

    The 45bisnt know as a man stopper because of energy.
     

    DaemonAssassin

    Why should we Free BSD?
    Jun 14, 2012
    23,994
    Political refugee in WV
    All I'm saying is the blackout is darn near a 30-30. I've had many of bang flops with a 110 at 2400 fps at 25-40 yards. But nevertheless, it is slow, so it's going to drop and drift A LOT. And I'm my opinion, muzzle energy of a 45ACP isn't much to sing about.

    The 45bisnt know as a man stopper because of energy.

    Simple physics says otherwise.

    Is is time to us explain the 3% math equation for physics and measurement, or should we wait 2 weeks for textbooks to come in? We can recite it all from memory, can you?
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,424
    Messages
    7,281,133
    Members
    33,451
    Latest member
    SparkyKoT

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom