RoadDawg
Nos nostraque Deo
- Dec 6, 2010
- 94,472
NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!
- Thread starter press1280
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Awaiting opinion count (If my math is right)
November - 1 (NY)
December - 7
January - 6
February - 7
March - 7
April - 10
-----------------------
38
November - 1 (NY)
December - 7
January - 6
February - 7
March - 7
April - 10
-----------------------
38
I am at the live Blog as well.
camo556
Ultimate Member
- Aug 29, 2021
- 2,634
The really interesting thing is that today's opinion from Roberts is from the Dec sitting. He probably did not author Dobbs.
Hold on to your seats.
Hold on to your seats.
It looks like only 2 opinions were released today so now we have to wait until May
But at least this means we are almost certain that NYC CCW was written by Thomas or Barrett.
I would almost bet It will be June before we have an answer from SCOTUS on the NY Case..Everyone!!! is waiting for that case..
Kharn predicted as much. We probably won't see Dobbs (abortion case) until then also.
jcutonilli
Ultimate Member
- Mar 28, 2013
- 2,474
No it stands for per curiam or by the court. It reflects the entire court rather than individual justices
Per curiam decision - Wikipedia
Last edited:
camo556
Ultimate Member
- Aug 29, 2021
- 2,634
I dont think Roberts has Dobbs, and this has me rethinking my prediction for NY Guns.
Thomas has the fewest # opinions out so far (1 vs avg of 2 1/2 for the rest).
I now think Roberts lost the majority in Dobbs and Ny Guns.
My new crystal ball has Thomas, Roberts concurring in part and dissenting in part, and Breyer writing his Magnum Opus dissent for retirement. He is going to hold the whole thing up and ride into the sunset flamethrowers ablaze.
Thomas has the fewest # opinions out so far (1 vs avg of 2 1/2 for the rest).
I now think Roberts lost the majority in Dobbs and Ny Guns.
My new crystal ball has Thomas, Roberts concurring in part and dissenting in part, and Breyer writing his Magnum Opus dissent for retirement. He is going to hold the whole thing up and ride into the sunset flamethrowers ablaze.
Kharn
Ultimate Member
Thomas would likely consider NYSRPA his magnum opus as well, even if he sat on the bench another four years. He's wanted to write a pro- carry opinion for a decade.
camo556
Ultimate Member
- Aug 29, 2021
- 2,634
That makes two of us!
I will pop a chubbie if it’s Thomas.
delaware_export
Ultimate Member
- Apr 10, 2018
- 3,239
Curious if Roberts floats, and it’s a majority, 6/3 for some and 5/4 for other parts, how does that work on gun cases? And more importantly, as circuits and states pick and choose to their liking, I am jaded enough to think they’ll quote roberts dissenting portions to continue to justify resistance. How blunt can the majority be?even to address possible 5/4 sections.. and the possible 6/3 as well?
any thoughts on that from the legal eagles here? While we have time to speculate.
any thoughts on that from the legal eagles here? While we have time to speculate.
RoadDawg
Nos nostraque Deo
- Dec 6, 2010
- 94,472
Who’s?
camo556
Ultimate Member
- Aug 29, 2021
- 2,634
Same as on any other case, the parts that got 5 votes control.
What really matters is not how blunt or not blunt they are. What matters is that the 5 votes are serious enough to vacate and remand some cases in the pipeline.
After Heller and McDonald they did not take other cases, even though the courts egregiously misapplied it.
Monday (5/2) is the next opinion issuance day.
Awaiting opinion count (If my math is right)
November - 1 (NY)
December - 7 (Dobbs v Jackson - Abortion), (Carson v Makin)
January - 6
February - 7 (WV v EPA - Chevron overreach - similar to bump stock)
March - 7
April - 10 (Kennedy v Bremerton), (Biden v Texas)
-----------------------
38
Awaiting opinion count (If my math is right)
November - 1 (NY)
December - 7 (Dobbs v Jackson - Abortion), (Carson v Makin)
January - 6
February - 7 (WV v EPA - Chevron overreach - similar to bump stock)
March - 7
April - 10 (Kennedy v Bremerton), (Biden v Texas)
-----------------------
38
Last edited:
- Oct 25, 2012
- 3,366
Yer just trying to tease everyone.
Texasgrillchef
Active Member
I stated in an early post that I was thinking something similar.
because… There will be three things basically said.
1. The right to carry beyond the cartilage of one’s home or business with the only reason needed being that of self defense. That will get the 6-3 vote. Roberts even questioned the validity of why should this be the only right that requires a permit.
2. Sensitive Places. This will get the 5-4 split. Over what should or shouldn’t be considered sensitive places.
3. what level of scrutiny &/or balancing should be used. Intermideiate, strict or THT. Or combination there of for future 2A cases by lower courts. This will also get a 5-4 vote.
All of this i JMHO Though.
I also think that Thomas might be writing this one. He has been wanting to write a 2A case ever since Heller. He has issued many dissents since Heller. Roberts really kind of owes him his Magnus Opus opinion case and this would be Thomas’s. If he doesn’t get to write this one, I would be willing to bet there were some mighty tough arguments and fighting going on Behind the scenes. Also if he doesn’t get NYSPRA as The Majority Opinion. He will definitely write a concurring opinion. Which sticks as well for lower courts. I also believe he might write an opinion for Young v Hawaii, or ANJRPC case when those are issued PC.
rob
DINO Extraordinaire
D
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
