Go Back   Maryland Shooters > Gun Rights and Legislation > National 2A Issues
Don't Have An Account? Register Here

Join MD Shooters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old August 13th, 2019, 06:37 PM #641
esqappellate's Avatar
esqappellate esqappellate is offline
President, MSI
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6,561
esqappellate esqappellate is offline
President, MSI
esqappellate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by krucam View Post
I feel sure the clerks will go on the side of the Justices they represent. Left leaners with report Look, its moot, corpus whatever, petitioners got what they wanted...
Right leaning clerks will report the voluntary cessation, they will say there is an obvious post Cert attempt only to change laws, the District and Circuit Courts allowed such a BS law to be sustained which is so obvious.
At the end of the day I believe the Oct 1 conference will moot this case, however 1 of the Held cases will be picked up...
Yup..... The question is which case? My money is on Rogers, cuz of the circuit conflict with Wrenn. Then the antis could *really* regret* the BS they pulled in the NYC case.
__________________
This may sound like legal advice, but it isn't. Don't rely on it. Hire your own counsel.
esqappellate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 13th, 2019, 06:54 PM #642
danb's Avatar
danb danb is offline
i pi
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Howard County
Posts: 18,683
danb danb is offline
i pi
danb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Howard County
Posts: 18,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by esqappellate View Post
Yup..... The question is which case? My money is on Rogers, cuz of the circuit conflict with Wrenn. Then the antis could *really* regret* the BS they pulled in the NYC case.
Here is hoping!!
danb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 13th, 2019, 07:23 PM #643
rascal rascal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 714
rascal rascal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 714
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stoveman View Post
They would anyway, irregardless of the outcome of this case.
I don't know, the issue is not what a few Dems will do, but what more will do, and to what effect.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxcab View Post
Truth. 2A is only one of their goals.
Nothing is more partisan than 2A. Regardless of their other goals, nothing is more effective and useful than attacking the second.
Quote:
Originally Posted by teratos View Post
I don't know if SCOTUS will appreciate the intimidation. A lot of lines are crossed by the Dems.
This is a warning to Roberts. And he may well care. Threats often do work.

The only actual meaningful win in this would be full on strict scrutiny.
rascal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 13th, 2019, 09:57 PM #644
Fedora Fedora is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 29
Fedora Fedora is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by esqappellate View Post
Yup..... The question is which case? My money is on Rogers, cuz of the circuit conflict with Wrenn. Then the antis could *really* regret* the BS they pulled in the NYC case.
As a layman, it seems "Rogers" (ready for immediate use) reaches further than "NYSR&PA" ((unloaded, locked container). Is this fancy on my part?
Fedora is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 13th, 2019, 11:51 PM #645
Pope414 Pope414 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 185
Pope414 Pope414 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by esqappellate View Post
Yup..... The question is which case? My money is on Rogers, cuz of the circuit conflict with Wrenn. Then the antis could *really* regret* the BS they pulled in the NYC case.
Esq. i agree 100% also I don't think they SCOTUS has forgotten the scam NJ pulled on them with Drake. Using Pantalano at the NJ Supreme Court to get Drake Cert. denied claiming an identical case was pending at the state level only to claim it was "improvendently granted" and dismissing it after Drake was denied. It would be poetic justice if Rogers (Drake 2.0) is the case that comes back and bites them in the ass.
Pope414 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 14th, 2019, 07:33 AM #646
Boxcab's Avatar
Boxcab Boxcab is online now
MSI EM
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: AA County
Posts: 5,665
Boxcab Boxcab is online now
MSI EM
Boxcab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: AA County
Posts: 5,665
Quote:
Originally Posted by rascal View Post
[snip]
Nothing is more partisan than 2A. Regardless of their other goals, nothing is more effective and useful than attacking the second.
[snip]
Roe v. Wade maybe?





.
__________________
Quote:
"I do find myself cursing the ghosts of the politicians and gun owners who let our 2nd Amendment rights degrade over the past century. Seven plus decades of being afraid to enthusiastically challenge any new ban against our gun rights has proven to be very foolish. Your rights will not preserve themselves; they must be pursued, secured and vigilantly maintained."
Boxcab is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 14th, 2019, 08:22 AM #647
2nd=Good+Substantial 2nd=Good+Substantial is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: The Hereford Zone
Posts: 1,257
2nd=Good+Substantial 2nd=Good+Substantial is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: The Hereford Zone
Posts: 1,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by teratos View Post
I don't know if SCOTUS will appreciate the intimidation. A lot of lines are crossed by the Dems.
FDR made the same threat when the Supremes ruled against some of his New Deal. While there was blowback and Republicans benefited in the subsequent election, at least some on the Court (two justices I believe) were intimidated enough that the prior decisions were reversed. I certainly see Roberts willing to bow to this tactic.
__________________
MSI, SAF, GOA & NRA Member
Md. Designated Collector
DINO
2nd=Good+Substantial is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 14th, 2019, 08:35 AM #648
clandestine's Avatar
clandestine clandestine is offline
AR15 Technical Instructor
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cecil County, MD
Posts: 34,482
Send a message via Skype™ to clandestine
clandestine clandestine is offline
AR15 Technical Instructor
clandestine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cecil County, MD
Posts: 34,482
Send a message via Skype™ to clandestine
The left have dirt on Roberts. He knows which side his bread is buttered on.
__________________
"It is well, I die hard, but I am not afraid to go."


School of the American Rifle Website

School of the American Rifle on Instagram
clandestine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 14th, 2019, 06:38 PM #649
delaware_export delaware_export is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 401
delaware_export delaware_export is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 401
NYC wants exemptions from the rights the constitution protects, and THE IL AG supports that.

It’s my assumption it’s related to the NYC.NYCRPC Case, i May be mistake

http://wlds.com/news/raoul-joins-coa...on-gun-rights/
delaware_export is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 15th, 2019, 06:02 AM #650
motorcoachdoug's Avatar
motorcoachdoug motorcoachdoug is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: In Comminuest Monkey Cnty,In the NON Free state of Marylandstine
Posts: 2,716
motorcoachdoug motorcoachdoug is offline
Senior Member
motorcoachdoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: In Comminuest Monkey Cnty,In the NON Free state of Marylandstine
Posts: 2,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by delaware_export View Post
NYC wants exemptions from the rights the constitution protects, and THE IL AG supports that.

Itís my assumption itís related to the NYC.NYCRPC Case, i May be mistake

http://wlds.com/news/raoul-joins-coa...on-gun-rights/
Wouldn't their have to be a vote in Congress in order to grant NYC that? If they want to be granted sovereignty, then they would have to pay for everything like health, signed MOU with NY State about law enforcement powers, their own state flag... and the people of NYC would end up having to pay for that as well.Talk about a city that would be even more corrupt if that happened...
motorcoachdoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Home Page > Forum List > Gun Rights and Legislation > National 2A Issues


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2019, Congregate Media, LP Privacy Policy Terms of Service