camo556
Ultimate Member
- Aug 29, 2021
- 2,634
From what I heard we have Roberts
6-3 we win
that's what I heard as well.
the betting markets agree as well. Roberts "reverse" went up.
From what I heard we have Roberts
6-3 we win
I agree that we're going to win.
I do believe, however, that the opinion will be stronger if Roberts votes against us and Thomas writes the majority holding.
So-called good cause permitting schemes are on their last legs. This decision will finally force MD to start issuing unrestricted W&C permits to ordinary citizens. The only question in my mind is what hoops will be added by the legislature. I expect a steep increase in the cost of the permit and an increase in the amount of training required. I also expect nearly every location to be declared a sensitive location to include banks, public transportation and all entertainment venues.
Don't forget carry insurance, safe requirements, mental health evaluation...on an on. Each one will have to be challenged. Yeah, just like I anticipated...A long tradition of permitting says Kav, with no historical support to back that up. Not in founding era..Big POS Well, you guys will most likely get what you wanted, a right conditioned upon a contractual agreement...Bravo
Once carry outside the home becomes established as a civil right, it becomes very difficult to put contingencies on the exercise of the right.
I agree that we're going to win.
I do believe, however, that the opinion will be stronger if Roberts votes against us and Thomas writes the majority holding.
So-called good cause permitting schemes are on their last legs. This decision will finally force MD to start issuing unrestricted W&C permits to ordinary citizens. The only question in my mind is what hoops will be added by the legislature. I expect a steep increase in the cost of the permit and an increase in the amount of training required. I also expect nearly every location to be declared a sensitive location to include banks, public transportation and all entertainment venues.
FixedFeels like a 5-4 win or possibly a 6-3 win if Roberts joins. He's the onlyconservativecloset liberal I have a bad feeling on. But you never know...
I agree that we're going to win.
I do believe, however, that the opinion will be stronger if Roberts votes against us and Thomas writes the majority holding.
So-called good cause permitting schemes are on their last legs. This decision will finally force MD to start issuing unrestricted W&C permits to ordinary citizens. The only question in my mind is what hoops will be added by the legislature. I expect a steep increase in the cost of the permit and an increase in the amount of training required. I also expect nearly every location to be declared a sensitive location to include banks, public transportation and all entertainment venues.
Wonder how these justices on the left would feel if to get an abortion you had to take a training class at your own expense, get finger printed and apply for an abortion permit at your own expense, and if the rules, costs, and exceptions were different in practically every state and county in the country? And the last I checked abortions aren't even mentioned in the constitution.
In some cases there will be different majority opinions exploring different facets of the law. Thus there could be a 5-4 vote on one aspect of the ruling and a 6-3 on another. I'm not enough of a court watcher to understand when/how this happens, but I don't think Roberts would be able to inhibit 5 other justices to make a clear, definitive ruling on the right to bear without an arbitrary government blessing based on an artificial standard.
My bigger concern is that he's able to persuade one or two of the more conservative bloc (insofar as gun rights) over to a moderated opinion.
That's precisely what Frosh did - he cherry picked one comment out of Heller and used it as a basis for policy, completely ignoring the overall context of the majority text.(not arguing with you... just asking/thinking with the keyboard)
well, with heller, we see the lower courts in the anti2a districts, like the 9th, quoting the dissent from heller, not the majority. or focusing on one or two minor sections of the majority... maybe messing with a few punctuation points, and ignoring heller.
TTAG assembled a distinguished panel of Second Amendment legal experts to discuss this mornings arguments in the case of New York Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen before the Supreme Court
Yep, I was thinking that I should probably get that Sig P365XL sooner. There'll be a run on carry guns if there's a favorable rulingI will, by inference, take it that a lot of pretty smart industry analysts listened in and heard, "This will be good for gun sales." Checked my portfolio: Ruger up over 3% since the hearing, Smith & Wesson up over 4%.
Excellent group of participants in this. Thanks fellasBeat me to it, came here to post the same video.lol