AAR: TOC (Matt Watson) Tactical Carbine II, Kearneysville, WV 7-19-2020

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Norton

    NRA Endowment Member, Rifleman
    Staff member
    Admin
    Moderator
    May 22, 2005
    122,879
    Your AARs are the best. I might take their Home Defense course in September.

    I was looking at that too. With my weekend stuff getting canned this Fall, I need to fill in the days with something productive.
     

    hogarth

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 13, 2009
    2,504
    Solid review as usual.

    I'm curious about this:

    "It was interesting to see people not engaging as they moved in, and taking a position in the corner before shooting. I tried to be a little more aggressive." and the short video that went with it.

    In the video, it looked like your partner kind of looked at the target you eventually shot, but then did a buttonhook and went for the other target. Then you entered and went right to the target he bypassed and nailed it. However, it didn't look like you checked that hard corner to your right (or maybe gamed it), which is not good. You've got to check that hard corner first AND not advance on the other target you ended up shooting.

    If you cannot get to a shoothouse/fighting in structures class, then at least get the "intro to the shoothouse" class with Pat Rogers video available with Panteao Productions. He explains it all in the video. It's not the best substitute for an actual class (what video is?), but it's better than nothing.
     

    erwos

    The Hebrew Hammer
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 25, 2009
    13,886
    Rockville, MD
    Solid review as usual.

    I'm curious about this:

    "It was interesting to see people not engaging as they moved in, and taking a position in the corner before shooting. I tried to be a little more aggressive." and the short video that went with it.

    In the video, it looked like your partner kind of looked at the target you eventually shot, but then did a buttonhook and went for the other target. Then you entered and went right to the target he bypassed and nailed it. However, it didn't look like you checked that hard corner to your right (or maybe gamed it), which is not good. You've got to check that hard corner first AND not advance on the other target you ended up shooting.
    That wasn't a particularly good run in that video, I completely agree. Should have checked the corner more explicitly (which I did in the run right after that). We were specifically told to only engage one target due to concerns about cross-lane shooting.

    The reality, as you know, is that you've got to throw substantial amounts of time at CQB before you can attain any reasonable level of proficiency. A couple hours in the afternoon isn't gonna do that.
     

    hogarth

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 13, 2009
    2,504
    That wasn't a particularly good run in that video, I completely agree. Should have checked the corner more explicitly (which I did in the run right after that). We were specifically told to only engage one target due to concerns about cross-lane shooting.

    The reality, as you know, is that you've got to throw substantial amounts of time at CQB before you can attain any reasonable level of proficiency. A couple hours in the afternoon isn't gonna do that.

    Oh, I understand that there were probably range limitations and such that would keep you from doing a lot of things. The failure to check that hard corner would likely be bad news for you and your partner if a bad guy was there, and advancing even a step or two into the room rather than along the wall could violate the "one meter rule", putting you close to your partner's line of fire if he finished engaging his own target and then engaged the one that you engaged (in a real situation, not here where he wasn't allowed to cross-lane fire). Gotta love when the video captures your poor run and you do a better one before or after, right?

    Given the many intricacies of CQB work, I am surprised to see even an inkling of it in a one-day "Carbine 2" course. I assume their "Carbine 1" is also one day? Thinking about my experience with other instructors that use the same nomenclature for their courses, there is NO WAY I'd be doing even a little bit of mock CQB with any of the students in those classes.

    I didn't see any reference in the AAR to the cost of the course (?).
     

    erwos

    The Hebrew Hammer
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 25, 2009
    13,886
    Rockville, MD
    Cost was $150. In fact, that's pretty much what all his courses run. I received no discounts. :) I probably should add that as a section to the template I use.

    I agree that I had some "misgivings" about doing CQB stuff with loaded guns with randos, but I had previously determined in the morning that skill level was uniformly high enough that it was going to be safe enough given what we were being asked to do. In my estimation, any shooting class where you run around with loaded guns means assuming some level of risk; some idiot could sling their gun, not put it on safe, and then punch one through your leg/foot if their trigger gets caught on gear, etc.. You know the score. I assume that in a full day CQB class with more free-form exercises, we'd be using sims.
     

    AssMan

    Meh...
    MDS Supporter
    Jan 27, 2011
    16,411
    Somewhere on the James River, VA
    I was looking at that too. With my weekend stuff getting canned this Fall, I need to fill in the days with something productive.


    I’m willing to commit. My HD setup is a two stamp gun which means I’ll need to get permission from our federal overlords to transport. PM me if you’re game.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     

    Norton

    NRA Endowment Member, Rifleman
    Staff member
    Admin
    Moderator
    May 22, 2005
    122,879
    I’m willing to commit. My HD setup is a two stamp gun which means I’ll need to get permission from our federal overlords to transport. PM me if you’re game.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Is that just for machine guns? I thought that suppressors were at least good to go without our federal masters' permission to pass.
     

    Norton

    NRA Endowment Member, Rifleman
    Staff member
    Admin
    Moderator
    May 22, 2005
    122,879
    I’m willing to commit. My HD setup is a two stamp gun which means I’ll need to get permission from our federal overlords to transport. PM me if you’re game.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    I'm supposed to have a gig that last weekend in September - I expect I'll hear within the week that it's been canceled.
     

    Norton

    NRA Endowment Member, Rifleman
    Staff member
    Admin
    Moderator
    May 22, 2005
    122,879
    Looks like suppressors are GTG, but SBRs require the form 20.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    OK - at least I haven't been committing a federal crime for the last several years :lol2:
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,382
    Messages
    7,279,507
    Members
    33,442
    Latest member
    PotomacRiver

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom