md_06unltd
Member
Here it is
Republicans Target D.C. Gun Laws in Wake of Shooting
http://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/81210-2
Republicans Target D.C. Gun Laws in Wake of Shooting
http://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/81210-2
Rep. Hudson to introduce Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act
- Thread starter swinokur
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Defense Rifle
Active Member
There's a new bill being pushed by the GOP that would allow visitors to conceal carry on their home-state permit or get a non-resident D.C conceal carry permit, apparently there is a rider to this bill that would also prevent DC from enforcing its gun control laws (e.g. magazine capacity, discharge of firearm). They might as well attach HR 38 with this bill too.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/15/rep-thomas-massie-introducing-bill-recognize-outsi/
This is a step in the right direction. Right in the heart of liberal country.
silentdynasty
Member
Mmmm like you said they better slap it to another bill otherwise it won't pass itself. But it is a start at least.
Fox123
Ultimate Member
They are going to waste the political capital and push this. We. I'll through that only protects them. They will then be able to have something to point to and say look what we did and check the gun lobby off the list. All while protecting themselves and leaving us out to dry.
Kharn
Ultimate Member
They need to protect anyone at a baseball game, not just baseball games near DC, or baseball games involving Congressmen. 
The next shooter might not be politically motivated.
The next shooter might not be politically motivated.
Bigfoot21075
Ultimate Member
They need to protect anyone at a baseball game, not just baseball games near DC, or baseball games involving Congressmen.
The next shooter might not be politically motivated.
EXACTLY could easily be a raghead or a black lies matters idiot.
They need to protect anyone at a baseball game, not just baseball games near DC, or baseball games involving Congressmen.
The next shooter might not be politically motivated.
No.
They need to recognize, and accept the fact, that people have a natural right to protect themselves anywhere, not just at baseball games. What good does it do to have all of the gun bans, security and metal detectors in the world at Washington DC, the capitol complex, congressional/government buildings, sports complexes, venues, etc. when the disarmed people that have to attend those places are sitting ducks when they leave the security mechanisms?
When will we ever get to the point where we understand that criminals are the problem, not guns?
HR 38
199 cosponsors
+3
S446
37
no change
199 cosponsors
+3
S446
37
no change
redeemed.man
Ultimate Member
The Senate is pathetic and needs to get their shit together.
especially in light of recent events. What better monument to those injured than to give every American the right to carry in defense of self and family?
It could be renamed The Right to Carry to Defend Yourself Republican Baseball Team Self Defense Act
It could be renamed The Right to Carry to Defend Yourself Republican Baseball Team Self Defense Act
knastera
Just another shooter
Or "The Scalise Act"
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I would like to nominate you to run for the Senate, well at least to be on the show "The Apprentice" ... You don't have any ties to Russia do you? remember that includes ever drinking vodka.
apologies for my sarcasm but I save money reading the legislative type threads as opposed to "The Depot" section.
I don't believe this matters at all, if the bill gets to a vote then all 52 GOP will vote for it.
- Aug 29, 2016
- 763
Which means nothing if the GOP is unwilling to kill the filibuster or to attach it to something else. The Democrats have complete control over their caucus now. There's zero chance 8 Democrats vote for it.
I am stating for the record I have never taken a drink of Vodka in my life and have no intention of ever doing so, but as William T. Sherman so eloquently stated,
"If nominated I will not run and if elected I will not serve"
I have far too much self respect to become a politician
"If nominated I will not run and if elected I will not serve"
I have far too much self respect to become a politician
Correct. This is where we need answers. Are they working on either killing the filibuster or working on a larger bill that includes reciprocity but also CAN get 60 votes to pass?
All of these news articles that say the bill is "working it's way through congress" and getting co-sponsors are pure smoke. It means nothing.
- Feb 19, 2013
- 18,766
I'm sure those elected to congress will soon vote themselves the right to carry.
sadly, you are probably right.
permits for thee, but not for me.
permits for thee, but not for me.
I'm thinking no, simply because whoever votes yes on that but turns around and votes no for everyone else will look very bad.
Instead they'll vote for armed guards.
they already said there isn't enough money for that.
