Z_Man
Ultimate Member
I never stated he was stopped for the sole reason of having a gun. He was stopped as a passenger in an automobile. Stop and search are not the same. He was searched for the reason of reasonably believed to be in possession of a firearm.
As I have stated, the words you use to agree with this stop are that you have assumed that being stopped for a traffic violation and being in possession of a firearm meet the requirement to be subjected to search without warrant. Are you suggesting that being armed in public (where legal) meets the requirement to no longer be free from search by the government without a warrant?
Being stopped for a traffic violation does not make one inherently dangerous.
Sent from my VS988 using Tapatalk
As I have stated, the words you use to agree with this stop are that you have assumed that being stopped for a traffic violation and being in possession of a firearm meet the requirement to be subjected to search without warrant. Are you suggesting that being armed in public (where legal) meets the requirement to no longer be free from search by the government without a warrant?
Being stopped for a traffic violation does not make one inherently dangerous.
Sent from my VS988 using Tapatalk