Could it be that this is possibly the greatest voluntary registration trick of all time? Interesting thought isn't it?
Yup. Could well be. (Frosh living in our heads now).
Gun Owners of Maryland: BEWARE!
- Thread starter DC-W
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Yup. Could well be. (Frosh living in our heads now).
Well no serials, no brands, no models listed. That’s not much for Frosh to sink his teeth into
FYI: My application was mailed on Saturday, certified and return receipt. Delivery is expected today by 8PM. When i tracked the number it has not been marked as delivered yet. I mailed to the 20226 address.
Last edited:
20226?
No wonder it hasn’t been delivered!
Lol
Lol
onedash
Ultimate Member
Emailed today. So I can continue wearing eye glasses. I definitely fire faster with them than without them.
Sorry 20226.
The ATF doesn’t give a crap because as far as their concerned, binary triggers are perfectly legal
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How do you prove BATFE received an email ?
Only proof is a return receipt requested via snail mail
Only proof is a return receipt requested via snail mail
- Dec 30, 2012
- 6,992
I agree with you, but good grief, we shouldn't have to be the ones to prove the fact.
No one else will.
It’s on us
It’s on us
Was it in reference to the MD statute?
from 8/31/2018 like an hour after my initial email
Good afternoon sir,
ATF's position regarding Maryland’s new law is posted on our public website in a Special Advisory issued by our Office of Public Affairs. I have included a hyperlink to the advisory for your convenience below.
https://www.atf.gov/news/pr/maryland-law-restricting-rapid-fire-trigger-activators
I trust this advisory clarifies ATF’s authority, however please let us know if we can be of further assistance by contacting us at (202)648-7120 or FIPB@atf.gov.
Regards,
R. Lawrence
Firearms Enforcement Specialist
Firearms Industry Programs Branch
Good afternoon sir,
ATF's position regarding Maryland’s new law is posted on our public website in a Special Advisory issued by our Office of Public Affairs. I have included a hyperlink to the advisory for your convenience below.
https://www.atf.gov/news/pr/maryland-law-restricting-rapid-fire-trigger-activators
I trust this advisory clarifies ATF’s authority, however please let us know if we can be of further assistance by contacting us at (202)648-7120 or FIPB@atf.gov.
Regards,
R. Lawrence
Firearms Enforcement Specialist
Firearms Industry Programs Branch
Not quite the same as acknowledging receipt of an email that they originally had said was not under their purview.
I’m mailing mine just to have a record of it
I’m mailing mine just to have a record of it
iH8DemLibz
When All Else Fails.
I sent the ATF an e-mail several months ago. Right after the bill was signed into law.
I'm certain the ATF received it. Because the e-mail didn't get kicked back as undeliverable. Printed a copy of the sent e-mail for my records. It has the ATF e-mail address on it. And the date sent.
The hard copy letter sent in today is just a redundancy. Two forms of proof that I did my best to comply with the law.
Just because it doesn’t bounce doesn’t mean it was received. I might buy a reply as proof but the lack of a response isn’t proof of anything.
YMMV
YMMV
TexDefender
Ultimate Member
- Feb 28, 2017
- 1,572
May post doesn't speak to binary triggers. But they will be concern with Maryland ' s requirement on a Federal Agency.
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
