I'd say pretty important. Otherwise you just have powder and a bullet flopping around in your magazine
Everything I have heard about AR shooting is that brass is not a huge deal. Lapua brass tends to be more consistent than others, but that does not seem to mean much in .223, versus .308, which it makes a bigger difference.
You can go nuts on this. There are guys over on SH that weigh their charges to 0.001 grains. REALLY??
I remember the story of Tubbs. He loaded up some ammo for a match, making every effort to control every variable. He went to the match and won. When he got home, he found his perfectly loaded match ammo sitting on the bench, he had shot the match with the match rejects.
In using a Dillion progressive press check the variance in weight of the power at the Bullet setting station. The press throws charges good enough for pistols loads and rifle hunting loads but not for precision rifle shooting. Also OAL will vary, you have to have consistent Ogive to land distance, again Dillon doesn’t do this. Use a single stage press for consistent Ogive to land distance and weight each charged. Read The reloading books by Glen Zidiker,
More info than you knew you needed.
Also LC brass is usually shot in full auto guns with very loose chambers, so that brass is really stretched, I use it for plinking or functional testing not for matches. You can find new LC brass aka federal brass new like at Cabela’s. But these cases have less internal volume so check your hot loads carefully. Take new LC brass and fill it to the top with your favorite rifle powder than pour that powder into a new LAPUA piece of brass, see how much lower level the powder reaches in the Lapua case. Or use resized LC to resized LAPUA brass.
In using a Dillion progressive press check the variance in weight of the power at the Bullet setting station. The press throws charges good enough for pistols loads and rifle hunting loads but not for precision rifle shooting. Also OAL will vary, you have to have consistent Ogive to land distance, again Dillon doesn’t do this. Use a single stage press for consistent Ogive to land distance and weight each charged. Read The reloading books by Glen Zidiker,
More info than you knew you needed.
Also LC brass is usually shot in full auto guns with very loose chambers, so that brass is really stretched, I use it for plinking or functional testing not for matches. You can find new LC brass aka federal brass new like at Cabela’s. But these cases have less internal volume so check your hot loads carefully. Take new LC brass and fill it to the top with your favorite rifle powder than pour that powder into a new LAPUA piece of brass, see how much lower level the powder reaches in the Lapua case. Or use resized LC to resized LAPUA brass.
I'll check out the books. I'm not ready for precision loads yet. My next rifle will probably push me in that direction, at least that's the plan.
Hmmm.... I see some issues here. I throw charges exactly on every charge with a 550, while running it as a progressive. I am also able to maintain 1/1000th of an inch, either side of zero, but 95 times out of 100, I am dead on the money for OAL. The Dillon is a truly incredible machine, if you know how to run it properly as a progressive press.
The only time I have OAL issues is when I use some factory seconds boolits, but those are for plinking loads, so being off a little bit doesn't matter very much.
Hmmm.... I see some issues here. I throw charges exactly on every charge with a 550, while running it as a progressive. I am also able to maintain 1/1000th of an inch, either side of zero, but 95 times out of 100, I am dead on the money for OAL. The Dillon is a truly incredible machine, if you know how to run it properly as a progressive press.
The only time I have OAL issues is when I use some factory seconds boolits, but those are for plinking loads, so being off a little bit doesn't matter very much.
That is amazing! I have measured the OAL of Sierra bullets from the same lot/box and have found up to 0.015" variance on just the bullet. Lately, I have found the same thing with Noslers too. Nosler used to be ran and boxed from individual machines so, they were extremely consistent. Guess that changed.
The critical measurement in regards to accuracy, is the one taken on the ogive where it contacts the lands of the rifling. VLD style bullets are very sensitive to this.
OAL is something I use just to insure the round will fit in the magazine. I measure several sample rounds and adjust OAL for the longest round to fit in the magazine with a little room to spare, depending on the type of bullet used and how much bearing surface is held by the case neck.
I have taken to using a VLD style seating stem for almost all of my competition ammo because it contacts the bullet much closer to point where the ogive contacts the rifling. Conventional seating stems contact the bullet too close to the nose of the bullet. The majority of inconsistencies I have found are closer to the bullet nose due to the way bullets are mass manufactured.
30 years of reloading makes sure my technique for pulling the lever is on point.
You are like 31!!!
That is amazing! I have measured the OAL of Sierra bullets from the same lot/box and have found up to 0.015" variance on just the bullet.
That is amazing! I have measured the OAL of Sierra bullets from the same lot/box and have found up to 0.015" variance on just the bullet. Lately, I have found the same thing with Noslers too. Nosler used to be ran and boxed from individual machines so, they were extremely consistent. Guess that changed.
The critical measurement in regards to accuracy, is the one taken on the ogive where it contacts the lands of the rifling. VLD style bullets are very sensitive to this.
OAL is something I use just to insure the round will fit in the magazine. I measure several sample rounds and adjust OAL for the longest round to fit in the magazine with a little room to spare, depending on the type of bullet used and how much bearing surface is held by the case neck.
I have taken to using a VLD style seating stem for almost all of my competition ammo because it contacts the bullet much closer to point where the ogive contacts the rifling. Conventional seating stems contact the bullet too close to the nose of the bullet. The majority of inconsistencies I have found are closer to the bullet nose due to the way bullets are mass manufactured.
The meplat (point) is not consistent on match bullets due to the open tip.