VA bill to shut down non state owned ranges.

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Sgt. Psycho

    Ultimate Member
    Nov 1, 2009
    1,922
    From the article:

    "If it wasn’t bad enough watching the action unfold surrounding unconstitutional gun laws and the militias being formed to fight against them, now it seems like Virginia is trying to pull yet another move.

    They want to shut down every gun range in the state that isn’t owned by the government.

    According to House Bill 567, any indoor shooting range would be prohibited by law – UNLESS it was inside of a building owned by the state.

    And any business owners who decided to defy the law could be facing up to a $100,000 fine and potential civil penalties."


    https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com...t-down-all-gun-ranges-not-owned-by-the-state/
     

    BlueHeeler

    Ultimate Member
    Apr 28, 2010
    7,086
    Washington, DC
    That is not an accurate article. Here is the actual bill:

    § 18.2-511.2. said:
    Indoor shooting ranges; prohibited in private buildings; exceptions; penalty.

    A. As used in this section, "indoor shooting range" means any fully enclosed or indoor area or facility designed for the use of rifles, shotguns, pistols, silhouettes, skeet, trap, or black powder or any other similar sport shooting.

    B. It is unlawful to operate an indoor shooting range in any building not owned or leased by the Commonwealth or the federal government unless (i) fewer than 50 employees work in the building or (ii) (a) at least 90 percent of the users of the indoor shooting range are law-enforcement officers, as defined in § 9.1-101, or federal law-enforcement officers, (b) the indoor shooting range maintains a log of each user's name, phone number, address, and the law-enforcement agency where such user is employed, and (c) the indoor shooting range verifies each user's identity and address by requiring all users to present a government-issued photo-identification card.

    C. Any person that violates the provisions of this section is subject to a civil penalty of not less than $1,000 nor more than $100,000 for the initial violation and $5,000 per day for each day of violation thereafter.

    Many ranges will be exempt from this bill, EXCEPT the NRA range which this bill seems to be maliciously targeting. It is still a garbage bill, but we need at least understand the facts before attacking it.
     

    kshaw

    Active Member
    Nov 21, 2012
    311
    Gaithersburg, MD
    I suspect that the State of Virginia will regret this action. You know that this will result in legal action by NRA and I can see Trump getting involved with this just like prior federal actions in support of Civil Rights. I would love to see a DOJ lawsuit against the state to enforce the 2nd Amendment.
     

    ted76

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jan 20, 2013
    3,151
    Frederick
    This bill is clearly targeting the NRA, as there is probably not another no .gov range in the whole state, in a building with 50 employees.
     

    MDGolom

    Ultimate Member
    Sep 29, 2010
    1,217
    Baltimore County
    This bill is clearly targeting the NRA, as there is probably not another no .gov range in the whole state, in a building with 50 employees.

    I'll agree it's an FU to the NRA, but thinking arout ranges, it might affect more than you think. If a range is in a strip mall of 10 stores, each store would only need 5 employees each to hit the limit. Do they consider the building only the part occupied by the range or the whole structure?
     

    PharaohF4

    Ultimate Member
    Mar 28, 2010
    2,472
    Easy way to get around that is to sell the range to a private entity. That would get the range down below the 50 employee limit.

    ah NO. We dont need to find more loop holes, we need to help free people of VA stop these bills and hopefully vote them out of office. make them twice about attacking a natural right guaranteed by the constitutional .
     

    Skipjacks

    Ultimate Member
    Not 50 employees of the range, 50 employees in the building regardless of whom they work for.

    This.

    So if the range is in one small corner of a larger building, the employees of the range AND of all the businesses also in the connected structure count towards the 50

    Think of Continental Arms in Timonium MD. They probably have 25 employees. And in the same building is a flooring store, a comedy club, and a post office which easily add up to another 100 employees.

    Same thing with Freedom in White Marsh MD. It's one store in a larger structure. I think most of the building is unoccupied, but it won't be forever.

    These are just bad laws that Virginians need to stop because if they don't...Maryland will be tripping over itself to make the same dumb decisions. Right now Maryland lawmakers are waiting to see if this goes well for gun grabbers in Virginia, I guarantee it.
     

    traveller

    The one with two L
    Nov 26, 2010
    18,395
    variable
    Constitution of the United States

    Article I, Section 9, Clause 3

    No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.







    If this can be shown as geared towards the NRA range and doesn't affect any other range in the state, it'll get slapped down pretty quickly.
     

    BeoBill

    Crank in the Third Row
    MDS Supporter
    Oct 3, 2013
    27,151
    南馬里蘭州鮑伊
    Constitution of the United States

    Article I, Section 9, Clause 3

    No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.

    If this can be shown as geared towards the NRA range and doesn't affect any other range in the state, it'll get slapped down pretty quickly.

    Pretty quickly = YEARS...
     

    rico903

    Ultimate Member
    May 2, 2011
    8,802
    Haven't lived or been to VA in years. Are all the liquor stores still state owned? That was a nightmare for most people, especially if you worked in the restaurant business. No deliveries and you had to take whatever they gave you. Ex. we need a case of Seagrams Seven , well we only have some other BS liquor, want it or not? Much like Montgomery County today, and corrupt as hell just like Mont County.
     

    f1racecar

    Member
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 11, 2011
    224
    Havre de Grace
    The NRA range is part of the parking garage not the main building. Hopefully, it should be exempt from the law as currently written.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,343
    Messages
    7,277,892
    Members
    33,437
    Latest member
    Mantis

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom