What did you do at your reloading bench today?

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • John from MD

    American Patriot
    MDS Supporter
    May 12, 2005
    22,960
    Socialist State of Maryland
    This discussion is kinda funny to me, personally.

    Your competition load: meticulously hand-prepared single-manufacturer cases trimmed on a Wilson trimmer, weighed for powder capacity, trickled powder onto hand-tweaked balance beam scales, hand-seated primers, and the most precise press for zero run out.

    My competition load: load in whatever components are cheap, and MARK7 EVO AND DILLON 650 GO BRRRRRR. It chambers and it's 2-3 MOA? SEND IT.

    Like, I'm all in favor of improving accuracy and consistency when possible, but there's a whole paradigm assumption that goes with many of these discussions.

    Very true. It really comes down to what you are willing to accept. When I load for shooting on a plinking range up to 25 yards, I use all my cast bullets, wrinkles and all. It doesn't make a difference when you are shooting at a 8 inch plate target.
     

    erwos

    The Hebrew Hammer
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 25, 2009
    13,890
    Rockville, MD
    Huge difference between a precision load and a competition load. I pump out ~350rph of 9mm for my competition loads. I load ~20rph of Creedmoor and Grendel loads for Peacemaker trips. Shooting 2-3 MOA at 1000yds? Might as well stay home.
    I've also been out to 1000+ on Peacemaker a few times. Depends on the size of the targets, but I agree that my standards are a little higher for ELR ammo (and I'm also not trying to shoot 55gr 5.56 out that far, haha).

    That said, 20rph is arguably too slow even for PRS usage, at least if you're shooting matches frequently. I believe the standard is to use a progressive with individually weighed charges from a CM, but that's not my sport.
     

    Sticky

    Beware of Dog
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 16, 2013
    4,503
    AA Co
    I've also been out to 1000+ on Peacemaker a few times. Depends on the size of the targets, but I agree that my standards are a little higher for ELR ammo (and I'm also not trying to shoot 55gr 5.56 out that far, haha).

    That said, 20rph is arguably too slow even for PRS usage, at least if you're shooting matches frequently. I believe the standard is to use a progressive with individually weighed charges from a CM, but that's not my sport.
    I am old school and have used an Ohaus scale since I started some 40 odd years ago, it just works and has never let me down. I am actually loading those 300wsm's to send this weekend at Peacemaker and again at the end of the month for the LRC. I use a Rockchucker press, load one step at a time and it has never failed me. (well, I did fail to charge one round out of some 500 or so I've run through this rifle, but that was me, not the process (except I must have skipped the 'eyeball every tray/round, whatever' to ensure equal powder levels)) :innocent0 (lesson relearned)

    Precision target and hunting ammo in rifle calibers are carefully produced. I dump a close charge and trickle it to the final weight and take more care in prep. Plinking rounds and practice pistol ammo I am not so meticulous about. It depends on what you need. Rifles I want 1moa or less, pretty much in all of em.
     

    Sticky

    Beware of Dog
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 16, 2013
    4,503
    AA Co
    Oh and yes. it's painful for an old guy to process 500rds of 9 brass one by one on a single stage press (and I add a step, cause I deprime it before tumbling). :lol2::lol2:
     

    Speed3

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 19, 2011
    7,836
    MD
    This discussion is kinda funny to me, personally.

    Your competition load: meticulously hand-prepared single-manufacturer cases trimmed on a Wilson trimmer, weighed for powder capacity, trickled powder onto hand-tweaked balance beam scales, hand-seated primers, and the most precise press for zero run out.

    My competition load: load in whatever components are cheap, and MARK7 EVO AND DILLON 650 GO BRRRRRR. It chambers and it's 2-3 MOA? SEND IT.

    Like, I'm all in favor of improving accuracy and consistency when possible, but there's a whole paradigm assumption that goes with many of these discussions.

    It really depends on the "game" your playing. 2-3 MOA might be fine for 3 gun at shorter ranges. 1 MOA might be fine for PRS stuff or service rifle. Bench rest or fclass, you need .25 MOA gun to be competitive. It gets super competitive and dropping 1 point can mean the difference of being in the top 3 or having a 5 way tie.

    Just recently at the fclass narionals, the midrange winner shot an 1800 (shot 180 rounds) and never shot over 1 MOA. These guys spare no expense and I'd bet most don't use a beam scale. Multiple A&D scales with autotricklers etc. Most people aren't that serious about it though. I've started with a generic hornady electronic scale, 2 Parker beam scales, 2 charge masters and now using the autotrickler.
     

    erwos

    The Hebrew Hammer
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 25, 2009
    13,890
    Rockville, MD
    It really depends on the "game" your playing. 2-3 MOA might be fine for 3 gun at shorter ranges.
    I was making first round hits with Wolf Gold at 460yds last time I went out. People really overestimate the amount of accuracy you need for 3gun. 2MOA is more than enough 95% of the time (if not more).

    But, yes, I get that benchrest and F-class guys have really high standards for accuracy. I utilize some of the same tools they do. I'm not denigrating that, I just feel like the reloading world sometimes gets stuck on accuracy as the only thing that matters, when different sports have different requirements.
     

    Speed3

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 19, 2011
    7,836
    MD
    I was making first round hits with Wolf Gold at 460yds last time I went out. People really overestimate the amount of accuracy you need for 3gun. 2MOA is more than enough 95% of the time (if not more).

    But, yes, I get that benchrest and F-class guys have really high standards for accuracy. I utilize some of the same tools they do. I'm not denigrating that, I just feel like the reloading world sometimes gets stuck on accuracy as the only thing that matters, when different sports have different requirements.

    100% agree. Heck some of those top national shooters in fclass do brass prep work on a progressive with auto drive. And positional shooting is really hard.

    Accuracy doesn't matter when you miss those wind calls. I have always thought service rifle/sling shooters were better overall shooters than fclass and bench rest. BR guys shoot 10 or less rounds in a minute and that relay is over. Fclass has smaller targets but they get a rear bag and a fancy tripod or bipod depending on class.
     

    John from MD

    American Patriot
    MDS Supporter
    May 12, 2005
    22,960
    Socialist State of Maryland
    Back in the day, I used to shoot rifle with an Air Force doctor. He didn't know what a scale was. He always took his reloading stuff out to the range and made adjustments as he was shooting by adjusting the volume of his powder measure. I thought he was nuts but his results were fantastic. He explained his theory to me but I have long since forgotten it but I have seen reloading done without worrying about a grain here or there.
     

    KRC

    Active Member
    Sep 30, 2018
    618
    Cecil County MD
    Although I agree with erwos that “different sports have different requirements” it truly amazes me to read about “precision” shooters who go to extraordinary lengths to make their ammo consistent, but do not believe small round-to-round differences in the mass of powder used makes a difference. This is especially true for LD and ELD shooters. Modern smokeless powders are extremely powerful, energy releasing nitro-based chemicals that literally supply the energy firearms use to propel heavy projectiles at 1000’s of fps. To believe that round-to-round variation in the amount (mass) of that very high energy material doesn’t matter to ultimate precision belies basic science. It amazes me to look at the tiny amount of powder in a 9mm or .223 round that is capable of providing enough energy to rip human/animal flesh apart. This stuff is very high energy, and the amount of energy released is directly proportional to the mass of the propellant.

    I’ll stick with my Chargemaster, programmed for higher precision, followed by check and adjust with my laboratory grade electronic balance - for each round. This is NOT blasting ammo.

    Yeah , I’m kinda OCD.
     

    Rockzilla

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 6, 2010
    4,560
    55.751244 / 37.618423
    I am old school and have used an Ohaus scale since I started some 40 odd years ago, it just works and has never let me down. I am actually loading those 300wsm's to send this weekend at Peacemaker and again at the end of the month for the LRC. I use a Rockchucker press, load one step at a time and it has never failed me. (well, I did fail to charge one round out of some 500 or so I've run through this rifle, but that was me, not the process (except I must have skipped the 'eyeball every tray/round, whatever' to ensure equal powder levels)) :innocent0 (lesson relearned)

    Precision target and hunting ammo in rifle calibers are carefully produced. I dump a close charge and trickle it to the final weight and take more care in prep. Plinking rounds and practice pistol ammo I am not so meticulous about. It depends on what you need. Rifles I want 1moa or less, pretty much in all of em.

    Yes sIr Rock Chucker, Ohaus Du-o-Measure, Lyman M5 or Lyman D7.
    Still all work great to this day.

    There are cartridges that I weigh every charge 17 Remington, 220 Swift, 221 Fireball, 22 Hornet. Then of course 308, basically because of all the different platforms..except the FN-FAL, HK91, Standard M1A's. 388LM is all single stage.

    Yes I still do some batch work on the Rock Chuckers, the Stars do the 9,45,38 Tasks and occasional Autochamp(s)

    -Rock
     

    erwos

    The Hebrew Hammer
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 25, 2009
    13,890
    Rockville, MD
    Just loaded ~500 more 9mm, and exhausted my remaining 9mm bullets. Time to decide if I want to keep going the 147 route or switch back to 124s or whatever. P320X5Ls are infamously a little inaccurate with 147, but I really do love the soft recoil.
     

    Harrys

    Short Round
    Jul 12, 2014
    3,430
    SOMD
    Just received my 45/70 350 cast mold, one of two I have ordered from Accurate Molds. The .500 S&W should be coming in a week or two. Will be heating things up shortly. Will decide to use gas checks after torching off a few rounds after testing.
     

    erwos

    The Hebrew Hammer
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 25, 2009
    13,890
    Rockville, MD
    Finally got a chance to run around with my 7.62x39 test rounds last night. 29gr of CFE BLK backing a 123gr SST seated to the cannelure? Magnificent. Definitely going to be making a pile of these. Need to chrono them, too, but accuracy was fan-freaking-tastic out of my AMD-65.

    22gr of of CFE BLK (min load) behind a FP 150gr coated bullet using RMR's infamous marginal junk brass? Eh, not so much. Cycling issues (albeit minor ones), feed issues (bullet related), the fun list of problems just goes on. Wasn't particularly dirty, and I didn't see any obvious problems with the brass after firing, but I think I'm going to abandon this bullet and hunt down some pulled .310s or something. There's a small piece of me that's like, screw it, just load these normally, but I don't think that's really such a prudent maneuver given how hot I tend to load.
     
    Last edited:

    Harrys

    Short Round
    Jul 12, 2014
    3,430
    SOMD
    Made an OS scabbard for the Henry 45/70
     

    Attachments

    • 1.jpg
      1.jpg
      112 KB · Views: 116
    • 2.jpg
      2.jpg
      100.6 KB · Views: 109

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,584
    Messages
    7,287,367
    Members
    33,480
    Latest member
    navyfirefighter1981

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom