Subaru Oil Consumption Class Action Settlement

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Brown016

    Active Member
    Mar 28, 2016
    124
    Has anyone with a Subaru identified in the class action settlement had their engine repaired? I am trying to find out how much of a hassle the process of getting the oil issue corrected will likely be. I read that, essentially, the engine has to be removed and disassembled to fix some piston seals...I am fairly sure that Subaru dealers do not want to do this and will throw up road blocks to dissuade a correction. I want the issue fixed since I'm not trying to do an oil change every 5k when it should be 7.5k.
     

    F-Stop

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 16, 2009
    2,491
    Cecil County
    I just got the papers in mail but have not looked at it.

    I always thought dealerships welcomed warranty work as they get reimbursed right from Subaru for parts and labor. Thoughts?
     

    Augie

    Ultimate Member
    Sep 30, 2007
    4,517
    Central MD
    I just got the papers in mail but have not looked at it.

    I always thought dealerships welcomed warranty work as they get reimbursed right from Subaru for parts and labor. Thoughts?

    No, warranty work sucks, the manufacturers rip off the techs making them work for roughly half of what the job is worth, for instance we are putting pistons and rings in a 4 cylinder engine, Mitchell time is around 26 hours, Toyota is paying us 15. It basically is coming out of the techs pocket.
     
    Last edited:

    mikemike328

    Active Member
    Aug 26, 2013
    193
    Baltimore
    while Augie is correct the dealership it self is more then willing to make the warranty repairs your vehicle needs they will be reimbursed by the manufacturers
     

    iCoder80

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Dec 31, 2015
    587
    Has anyone with a Subaru identified in the class action settlement had their engine repaired? I am trying to find out how much of a hassle the process of getting the oil issue corrected will likely be. I read that, essentially, the engine has to be removed and disassembled to fix some piston seals...I am fairly sure that Subaru dealers do not want to do this and will throw up road blocks to dissuade a correction. I want the issue fixed since I'm not trying to do an oil change every 5k when it should be 7.5k.

    Are you saying you are using a quart every 5k miles? Subaru will tell you that is perfectly acceptable and probably will not even start an oil consumption test.

    Why aren't you just topping off your oil until the next change is due?

    My understanding is the actual repair is now to replace the short block.
     

    Brown016

    Active Member
    Mar 28, 2016
    124
    Are you saying you are using a quart every 5k miles? Subaru will tell you that is perfectly acceptable and probably will not even start an oil consumption test.

    Why aren't you just topping off your oil until the next change is due?

    My understanding is the actual repair is now to replace the short block.

    If something is supposed to work a certain way, then it should work that way. I should not have to top off around 5k when it's supposed to go to 7500. I could have purchased a car that runs on conventional oil for 5k oil changes. Getting an engine alert about low oil is unacceptable when operating within the framework provided.

    My biggest concern, outside of the work being completed, is the length of time to complete the job. It is not within my luck to get a courtesy car.
     

    Brown016

    Active Member
    Mar 28, 2016
    124
    I just got the papers in mail but have not looked at it.

    I always thought dealerships welcomed warranty work as they get reimbursed right from Subaru for parts and labor. Thoughts?

    I tried finding reviews by people that got the work done so I could figure out what would happen and how long it takes in terms of effort and completion by the shop. The one bit I could find was that the dealership changed the oil and told the guy to return after 1200 miles...he checked the oil level after leaving to discover it was overfilled. Fairly sure he invalidated the test since he said there was a sticker on the dipstick (to prevent tampering). However, the spectre of shenanigans was raised and I am paranoid when it comes to these things.
     

    iCoder80

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Dec 31, 2015
    587
    If something is supposed to work a certain way, then it should work that way. I should not have to top off around 5k when it's supposed to go to 7500. I could have purchased a car that runs on conventional oil for 5k oil changes. Getting an engine alert about low oil is unacceptable when operating within the framework provided.

    My biggest concern, outside of the work being completed, is the length of time to complete the job. It is not within my luck to get a courtesy car.

    Then you are probably going to be disappointed in the outcome of the process.

    Your car has to fail an oil consumption test before Subaru will consider it an issue. A quart every 5k miles is not going to fail.

    My wife's car uses a quart every 3500 or so miles and that is within spec.

    There is a reason part of the settlement is to reimburse owners for up to 6 quarts of oil.

    No where is it written that your car is not supposed to use any oil between oil changes. ALL engines use a certain amount of oil as part of the internal combustion process.
     

    protegeV

    Ready to go
    Apr 3, 2011
    46,880
    TX
    OP, what year is your car?

    I still think any interval over 5k is ridiculous, regardless of what claims the manufacturers make. I've seen countless GM 3.6l engines burnt up because the oil change light wouldn't come on til 15k or more miles and owners have no common sense.
     

    J.T

    Ultimate Member
    Jul 23, 2012
    1,081
    MD
    I still think any interval over 5k is ridiculous, regardless of what claims the manufacturers make. I've seen countless GM 3.6l engines burnt up because the oil change light wouldn't come on til 15k or more miles and owners have no common sense.
    +1
    Make and model are irrelevant. Oil is cheap... Change it
     

    hkuspcomp

    Member
    Jun 29, 2014
    13
    I've owned 4 subarus. 3 new and 1 used. The one used turned out to be highly abused previously and by the time I sold it, it would take 1 quart every 1000 miles!
     

    MigraineMan

    Defenestration Specialist
    Jun 9, 2011
    19,242
    Frederick County
    My 2009 eats oil at an alarming rate, but alas, I'm not within the class boundaries. No extended warranty for me (which wouldn't matter anyways, as I've got 165k+ miles on it already.) I'm the original owner, and it was broken-in properly. Been having this issue since it was new.

    I'm convinced the problem is thermal, not rings. Consumption goes down in the winter.
     

    F-Stop

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 16, 2009
    2,491
    Cecil County
    No warranty work sucks, the manufacturers rip off the techs making them work for roughly half of what the job is worth, for instance we are putting pistons and rings in a 4 cylinder engine, Mitchell time is around 26 hours, Toyota is paying us 15. It basically is coming out of the techs pocket.

    Interesting to hear a technicians view as well. Thanks for sharing.
     

    Brown016

    Active Member
    Mar 28, 2016
    124
    +1
    Make and model are irrelevant. Oil is cheap... Change it

    Synthetic oil is not cheap. Oil changes for synthetic are not cheap. I think a lot of people are missing the point of the original post...Subaru has admitted fault and have agreed to a settlement for repair because the vehicles that are identified are not operating as intended. If your car is designed to have oil changes at 5,000 miles and is running low at 3,000 miles, you have a problem. Likewise, if a car is designed to have oil changes at 7500 miles but, is running low at 5,000, there is a problem.
     

    protegeV

    Ready to go
    Apr 3, 2011
    46,880
    TX
    Synthetic oil is not cheap. Oil changes for synthetic are not cheap. I think a lot of people are missing the point of the original post...Subaru has admitted fault and have agreed to a settlement for repair because the vehicles that are identified are not operating as intended. If your car is designed to have oil changes at 5,000 miles and is running low at 3,000 miles, you have a problem. Likewise, if a car is designed to have oil changes at 7500 miles but, is running low at 5,000, there is a problem.

    What kind of Subaru do you have? Not many of them require full synthetic oil.
     

    protegeV

    Ready to go
    Apr 3, 2011
    46,880
    TX
    Interesting to hear a technicians view as well. Thanks for sharing.

    I can echo Augie's sentiments. We have a similar problem with the equinox burning oil. Book time for the repair is around 20hrs. GM warranty pays 10.6
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,401
    Messages
    7,280,172
    Members
    33,449
    Latest member
    Tactical Shepherd

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom