VICTORY IN PALMER!!!!

DC-W · Mar 13, 2015

If the house is a rockin', don't bother knockin'

danb · Mar 13, 2015

krucam said:
Poked PACER for Palmer at Circuit Court. The 30 day shift right is approved, opening brief now due 4/15.

Also, the Brady Bunch comes a knockin'...

Allow me to summarize the Brady bunch brief:
* blood
* streets
* etc.

Southwest Chuck · Mar 13, 2015

danb said:
Allow me to summarize the Brady bunch brief:
* blood
* streets
*children
* etc.

Parden my addition ... :innocent0

Blacksmith101 · Mar 14, 2015

The Brady Bunch brief in brief!

TxAggie · Mar 16, 2015

danb said:
Really? They question shooting the dog? I thought only the rookies hesitated.

What difference at this point does it make?!

danb · Mar 16, 2015

TxAggie said:
What difference at this point does it make?!

Don't confuse people with facts and logic. It's for the children!

Boxcab · Mar 17, 2015

Mr. Gura's recent blog (Amicus Detritus) comes to mind...

http://alangura.com/

swinokur · Apr 1, 2015

WMAL is reporting that DC has dropped their appeal to the DC Circuit in Palmer.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local...hpModule_99d5f542-86a2-11e2-9d71-f0feafdd1394

krucam · Apr 1, 2015

swinokur said:
WMAL is reporting that DC has dropped their appeal to the DC Circuit in Palmer.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local...hpModule_99d5f542-86a2-11e2-9d71-f0feafdd1394

I guess they've accepted that fighting No-Issue is a lost cause and will instead concentrate their effort on preserving the new May-Issue regime, which is being challenged in Wrenn...

Bob A · Apr 1, 2015

swinokur said:
WMAL is reporting that DC has dropped their appeal to the DC Circuit in Palmer.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local...hpModule_99d5f542-86a2-11e2-9d71-f0feafdd1394

Once that is official, can we carry in DC?

swinokur · Apr 1, 2015

No. The ruling is being held until Judge Sculin rules on SAF's contempt motion.

NO CARRY YET.

IANAL

Klunatic · Apr 1, 2015

Bob A said:
Once that is official, can we carry in DC?

No because the new BS law they pass in November is still in effect until the judge rules the city in contempt for not following his order.

TxAggie · Apr 1, 2015

So what happens if he rules the new law doesn't satisfy his ruling? It becomes a brand new case, right? Can he actually rule the new laws unconstitutional?

Maestro Pistolero · Apr 1, 2015

I seriously thought that was an April fool's joke, lol. But they're focusing on the next generation infringement scheme. Oh well, that's why there is already a new lawsuit.

I do love a win in whatever sized bite.

pilotguy · Apr 1, 2015

TxAggie said:
So what happens if he rules the new law doesn't satisfy his ruling? It becomes a brand new case, right? Can he actually rule the new laws unconstitutional?

It will be interesting to see because I feel that the judge basically said that unless they bring him a law that satisfies his criteria it will be constitutional carry.

Mr H · Apr 1, 2015

Maestro Pistolero said:
I seriously thought that was an April fool's joke, lol. But they're focusing on the next generation infringement scheme. Oh well, that's why there is already a new lawsuit.

I do love a win in whatever sized bite.

Agree.....

But they're still pretty big elephants.

jbrown50 · Apr 1, 2015

I wonder how much the pressure from Sen. Rubio and Rep. Jordan's new law S. 874 had to do with them dropping the appeal. Norton said herself, on a News Channel 8 interview that she no longer had the pull in the Senate, that it would take, to get the law dropped.

randian · Apr 1, 2015

krucam said:
I guess they've accepted that fighting No-Issue is a lost cause and will instead concentrate their effort on preserving the new May-Issue regime, which is being challenged in Wrenn...

Not really, they're keeping no-issue by wrapping it in may-issue clothes, just like California and New Jersey do. Peruta looks set to keep in-substance no-issue in place in California, and no challenge of New Jersey's and New York City's in-substance no-issue regimes has ever been successful.

Laddertowr · Apr 2, 2015

JB I was waiting for Norton to doze off and fall out her chair during that interview... takes alot out a person trying to park a car between the lines... and she has really slowed down speech wise

swinokur · Apr 2, 2015

What happens if Sculin rules DC in contempt, invalidates the new may issue law, then lifts his temporary hold on his original order? Back where we started ? Would DC appeal that?

It seems we'd be back at permitless carry yet again?

Is this not correct?

Legal eagles please chime in.

VICTORY IN PALMER!!!!

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

Ultimate Member

dont be a dumbass

A Calguns Interloper.. ;)

Grumpy Old Man

Ultimate Member

dont be a dumbass

MSI EM

In a State of Bliss

Ultimate Member

όυ φροντισ

In a State of Bliss

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Active Member

Ultimate Member

Banana'd

Ultimate Member

Active Member

trigger puller

In a State of Bliss

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics