indeed Good Dr., indeed.
Rep. Hudson to introduce Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act
- Thread starter swinokur
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
redeemed.man
Ultimate Member
I don't know about that, it seems even Ginsburg understands that to bear arms refers to carrying arms in case of confrontation which of course is much more likely in public than it is in the home. She was just intellectually dishonest enough to try to claim it is not an individual right.
famous words
"most notably in the home"
That certainly didn't sound like carry outside your home is illegal.
"most notably in the home"
That certainly didn't sound like carry outside your home is illegal.
This. But the problem will be larger than that. We should also be fighting for civil monetary remedies written into any law, or you can expect a trip to the live scan machine and an overnight stay if you get caught carrying in a slave state.
Last edited:
Bingo. They are already in the gay marriage license business. To say securing an enumerated right is overstepping the incorporation of the republic is hogwash.
- Feb 19, 2013
- 18,760
Day one?
redeemed.man
Ultimate Member
Definitely not but much better odds that something happens under Trump than under Hogan.
Step 1 National Reciprocity
Step 2-Either the GA or Hogan allows residents to carry because everyone else can.
Step 2-Either the GA or Hogan allows residents to carry because everyone else can.
Last edited:
torched02
Rottie's Rule!
- May 6, 2013
- 310
Maryland has already given me a permit no need to wait for Ms. Dixon, but you go right ahead.
rob
DINO Extraordinaire
National reciprocity, good. Fed controlled of permits, bad. That which the fed giveth, that which the fed can taketh away.
Rob.
Sent from my SM-T320 using Tapatalk
Rob.
Sent from my SM-T320 using Tapatalk
Completely irrelevant. Maryland has given me a permit as well, but what does that have to do with anything being discussed here?
Thank you for an infusion of common sense.
Mr H
Banana'd
Well bully for you.
Being 'given' (read, granted) a permit is nothing more than begging the state to allow you to exercise an enumerated right, while thousands of otherwise worthy people are excluded (all while bad guys run wild).
But, hey... You're got yours.
Merry Christmas.
torched02
Rottie's Rule!
- May 6, 2013
- 310
I was simply answering a bit of a smart pointed statement by Mr. Jones that was directed at me. My response was to him and was not an indictment of the topic that the Op had started. He smartly said that "I could wait for Ms. Dixon to issue permits if and when she got elected." I understand that it is not a fair or equitable system that issues permits in Maryland. But it certainly is not my fault that some others did not get theirs........so just relax. Geez....a lot of butt hurting out there on this topic.
yep, there is a lot of butt hurt among those of us who are being deprived of a right, not a privilege.
And rightlfully so.
I wonder if you'd feel differently if you were one of us who are not deemed worthy by the Lords of Maryland
Congratulations on your permit.
And rightlfully so.
I wonder if you'd feel differently if you were one of us who are not deemed worthy by the Lords of Maryland
Congratulations on your permit.
Last edited:
Sometimes things don't come across so well in text, and your post most certainly did not. Still doesn't. You know this is a hot topic here. Thanks for the clarification.
Here is an article that correctly interprets the law, not making the mistake I initially made. As written this bill allows carry in all states but your state of residence on any permit, not just residents of a state who have a resident state issued permit.
A number of news articles made the same error I initially did. As pointed out the change in interpretation is because of the word OR and not AND in the wording.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/05/g...ional-concealed-carry-bill-for-next-congress/
A number of news articles made the same error I initially did. As pointed out the change in interpretation is because of the word OR and not AND in the wording.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/05/g...ional-concealed-carry-bill-for-next-congress/
Attachments
Last edited:
That's covered in this particular bill.
yep, states like NY, NJ and others better have deep pockets. The bill imposes court costs and other fees on states who prosecute people who are carrying in compliance with the law.
They will have 90 days after enactment to educate LEO and over zealous prosecutors that it's going to start costing them money if they arrest people carrying under the new law. FOPA had no such teeth.
.
.
They will have 90 days after enactment to educate LEO and over zealous prosecutors that it's going to start costing them money if they arrest people carrying under the new law. FOPA had no such teeth.
.
.
Attachments
That article is misleading IMO. It seems to suggest people from NY, NJ, exc can go get a non resident permit and carry in their home state as long as they follow the home states laws.
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
-
-
Convicted For Building Guns; Judge says, “Do not bring the Second Amendment into this courtroom” (2 Viewers)- Started by Harrys
- Replies: 1
-
-
