R&R Arrested at March On NRA

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • fidelity

    piled higher and deeper
    MDS Supporter
    Aug 15, 2012
    22,400
    Frederick County
    As a cop who has had to work the civil disturbance detail before, I can promise you that 99% of arrests are ordered by the line commander... not the line officer.

    This was a political decision, 100%. The line officer is following a lawful order of a superior and has no discretion. ...
    This was the assumption in the other thread, but I'm glad you posted first hand experience. I bet a number of officers were bothered that they couldn't do equal enforcement on both sides (with higher-ups putting them in this position through creation of a DMZ).

    Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
     

    whistlersmother

    Peace through strength
    Jan 29, 2013
    8,963
    Fulton, MD
    Pretty hard to actually get in a cops pocket book. The agency assume's 99.9% of liability in these financial suits.
    And maybe that's why it's so easy to just "follow orders".

    The officer has no downside risk, especially arresting someone that doesn't have 100 riotous suporters on the arrestees side.

    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
     

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,462
    Westminster USA
    R&R Arrested at March On NRA

    While not excusing anyone’s behavior, I see a difference between turning dogs on someone and a simple arrest.

    Sgt Pope not so much. If he got his order from a politician and not a superior supervisor, he had discretion and chose not to use it. We won’t know that until Discovery is complete or until trial

    And it would appear from the photos that one of the arresting officers was one of the on scene supervisors. So perhaps he didn’t feel it was illegal to begin with .



    Guess the court will decide
     

    Bob A

    όυ φροντισ
    MDS Supporter
    Patriot Picket
    Nov 11, 2009
    30,914
    Leadership of FCPD and the County Exec screwed the pooch. Cops on the scene had no opportunity to exercise discretion.

    I had a long and reasonable conversation with Lt Becker. His hands were tied by higher-ups. It's sad that the officer in the street has to put up with political interference which essentially negates any good that he/she might accomplish on the scene, acting in accordance with the actuality rather than the fantasies of their Dear Leaders.
     

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,462
    Westminster USA
    R&R Arrested at March On NRA

    I’m not gonna lose my job and career because some left leaning pol thought it was good idea to cave in to the leftist mob. Let them take the heat.

    Yep reality bites

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     

    ShafTed

    Ultimate Member
    Mar 21, 2013
    2,223
    Juuuuust over the line
    So we can assume at 9;30 am the police leaders or political hacks decided then at that time when R&R was to be arrested .


    Decided at 9;30

    arrested later in day .

    My own personal reading comprehension tells me that 9:30 AM is the designated time for the court appearance. I saw no information on the time of summons on the pic posted.
     

    welder516

    Deplorable Welder
    MDS Supporter
    Jun 8, 2013
    27,429
    Underground Bunker
    My own personal reading comprehension tells me that 9:30 AM is the designated time for the court appearance. I saw no information on the time of summons on the pic posted.

    I think you are correct. It is the court appearance Time

    But Lt Becker may still need a new watch!

    lol

    My apologies , I read it wrong . You gentlemen are correct . I misunderstood Stove's comment and posting my bad .
     

    Blacksmith101

    Grumpy Old Man
    Jun 22, 2012
    22,266
    And the arresting officer yesterday, will he be sued?

    "Following orders" sounds like it is getting expensive for the rank and file.

    Perhaps getting into their personal pocketbook may make them less hesitant to "follow orders".

    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

    Probably sue the arresting officer to find out who told him to perform the arrest and to testify that R&R was not causing any trouble and it will probably he that points out the "Line" was not yet crossed when the arrest took place. Then whoever told him will be added to the suit to find out who told him and so it will go up the chain until either the top is reached or some poor sap is made to throw himself on the sword to protect someone with too high a profile.

    When willfully interfering with a persons civil rights an official can loose their immunity and become personally liable, the money then comes out of their pocket not the Department's. The civil rights movement changed more things than just not sitting in the back of the bus or being served at the lunch counter.

    Link about personal liability:
    https://www.jstor.org/stable/27890981?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
     
    Last edited:

    28Shooter

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Sep 19, 2010
    8,217
    Baltimore, Maryland
    Rack was clearly singled out and discriminated against - Was it his race? Was it his long hair? Was it his age? Maybe his gender? What? There is no excuse for this and whoever took "call" to arrest him/facilitate the arrest should be compelled in open court and under oath to the testify as to who gave the order and then that person should be compelled to appear and be questioned as to the double-standard/discriminatory arrest. Somebody should lose a job over this though I'm sure nobody will.
     

    pilot25

    Ultimate Member
    Jul 13, 2016
    1,822
    The NRA should provide pro bono lawyers, and a lot of them, for his court date. To expose the hypocrisy of the Fairfax police dept and govt.
     

    montoya32

    Ultimate Member
    Patriot Picket
    Jun 16, 2010
    11,311
    Harford Co
    To be clear, they acknowledge the mistake of the double standard but still issued R&R a summons.

    Admitting a mistake means they admit to violating R&R's constitutional rights. Settlement check in the mail? When was R&R released? After the event was over or were you guys able to cross once he was out? Did they still enforce the line once he was released?
     

    montoya32

    Ultimate Member
    Patriot Picket
    Jun 16, 2010
    11,311
    Harford Co
    The NRA should provide pro bono lawyers, and a lot of them, for his court date. To expose the hypocrisy of the Fairfax police dept and govt.

    I noticed the sheriff's dept using NRA property to escort R&R into custody. I found that interesting.
     

    RepublicOfFranklin

    Ultimate Member
    Mar 16, 2018
    1,137
    The ‘Dena - DPRM
    “To Protect Democrat Optics and to Serve the Democrat Agenda” is pretty much the motto of the entire Fairfax county government. NOVA is an embarrassment to actual VA and should counted as DC so their votes won’t count.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     

    ironpony

    Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jun 8, 2013
    7,239
    Davidsonville
    Given these arrests for no reason other than an attempt to silence a person/a group/an amendment/a natural right which is at the front of the news nearly daily, I don’t think I would go anywhere alone.

    Is there jail time for giving these orders or just a check written, because there seems to be enough money to do this many times over. Two false arrests in separate states should make national news, unless it’s all being orchestrated from the same bank account, but I’m pretty sure the media is not controlled by an agenda?. Just a thought. Please pass the tinfoil.
     

    pilot25

    Ultimate Member
    Jul 13, 2016
    1,822
    So is it the general feeling the cops were forced to be biased against the PP? Is that even legal to force the police to act in such a manner. I know a few Fairfax cops and they are all pro-2A. I don't see them in the pictures however. Maybe the cops at the event were hand picked because they are anti-2A.
     

    Ronan

    3D Printing Guru
    Jul 30, 2018
    194
    Annapolis, MD
    I thought crossing a police line was illegal, unless escorted by an officer (or told right then/there that its alright to proceed)?

    I got cited in the past for crossing the yellow tapes when trying to get across the road so i could get home. Others did it right before me, nothing happened to them...

    Hope R&R has a good lawyer... sticky situation... :(
     

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,462
    Westminster USA
    According to VA statute posted by another member, the police line was illegal. therefore the arrest was illegal.

    IANAL

    No idea if it will be proven however.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,401
    Messages
    7,280,254
    Members
    33,449
    Latest member
    Tactical Shepherd

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom