PowPow
Where's the beef?
Let's not fix it for them.
HB1261 - Weapon Crimes - Assault Long Guns and Copycat Weapons
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Let's not fix it for them.
If I have a day off sometime soon, I'll take a drive down there and see what I can find out. If I get a process or any useful info, I will post it here. Would be nice to know what they know, in case we have to register the ones they are already aware of.
Bertfish
Throw bread on me
Yes I would like to have a list myself.
- Dec 30, 2012
- 7,001
Squaregrouper
Kragaphile
I'm with you... but if it is already registered to your name, and you had no legal way to dispose of it without going to an FFL, then it is already traceable to you, and thus, probably a lost item in terms of confiscation.
Thank you, Sir!
KevinK
Ultimate Member
You mean those ones sold to a friend of a friend in another state using an FFL in that state, that you can't recall, as it was many years ago?
Skipjacks
Ultimate Member
Can't be lost to confiscation if it was already lost in a boating accident.
Modern problems call for poor boating safety.
I see one possible problem
People purchased a Bushmaster Brand HBAR which is a copy of a Colt HBAR. MSP incorrectly interpreted the Gwinn Bushmaster Rifle as meaning all Bushmaster brand ARs and has it as banned. So anyone (and there are many) who has one purchased on a 4473 only may be screwed. Especially if purchased after oct 1 2013 and before MSP made the update to the list
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
People purchased a Bushmaster Brand HBAR which is a copy of a Colt HBAR. MSP incorrectly interpreted the Gwinn Bushmaster Rifle as meaning all Bushmaster brand ARs and has it as banned. So anyone (and there are many) who has one purchased on a 4473 only may be screwed. Especially if purchased after oct 1 2013 and before MSP made the update to the list
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dogmeat
Ultimate Member
Imagine if you will, (I say imagine because so few will actually do so) everyone in the state with an "As Defined UnRegistered Assault Gun" were to appear at the Barracks to register them. How many do you think that would be? I will take a guess and say 10% of the Maryland Population, or say 620,000 people with what, 1 or 2 or 5 or 10 guns each? That's a hell of a lot of typing for someone!
Imagine too, that you had to bring them with you so they could verify S/Ns. So, assuming an average of 3 guns per person (I know, pikers right?) that's almost 2,000,000 guns at the barracks. So, how many does the MD National Guard have?
Imagine the optics......
(Note: To all the MGA spies on MDS, this has been a hypothetical thought exercise and in no way represents what will actually happen. Your mileage will undoubtedly vary...)
Imagine too, that you had to bring them with you so they could verify S/Ns. So, assuming an average of 3 guns per person (I know, pikers right?) that's almost 2,000,000 guns at the barracks. So, how many does the MD National Guard have?
Imagine the optics......
(Note: To all the MGA spies on MDS, this has been a hypothetical thought exercise and in no way represents what will actually happen. Your mileage will undoubtedly vary...)
MichaelZWilliamson
Member
- Jun 4, 2015
- 71
Summary:
Quote:
Altering the definition of "copycat weapon" applicable to certain criminal prohibitions relating to assault weapons; requiring a certain person who lawfully possessed a certain firearm before October 1, 2020, to register the firearm with the Department of State Police on or before January 1, 2021; providing that a person who lawfully possessed a certain firearm before a certain date and who voluntarily registers the firearm on or after a certain date and before a certain date is not subject to certain criminal penalties; etc.
__________________
Whoever drafted that should be shot for abuse of the English language.
Quote:
Altering the definition of "copycat weapon" applicable to certain criminal prohibitions relating to assault weapons; requiring a certain person who lawfully possessed a certain firearm before October 1, 2020, to register the firearm with the Department of State Police on or before January 1, 2021; providing that a person who lawfully possessed a certain firearm before a certain date and who voluntarily registers the firearm on or after a certain date and before a certain date is not subject to certain criminal penalties; etc.
__________________
Whoever drafted that should be shot for abuse of the English language.
MichaelZWilliamson
Member
- Jun 4, 2015
- 71
Who are the government's official enforcers, and therefore part of the opposition.
Stop this worship of the police as good guys. There may be good cops, but the department is the government's official enforcement squad. If it enforces bad laws, it is part of the problem, not your friend.
The problem with that is there is a reporting requirement for stolen firearms. If you report it, you are in possession of a stolen firearm. If you don't, it's not stolen.....
Remember the 80's? Just to take your minds off this bill we should all reminisce about the 80's.
I appreciate you willing to send people my way to buy my house.
I honestly don’t care if someone else’s tax money replaces mine at this point. It’s all about me and my family’s rights and freedoms to own what we want and carry it outside of our home in our home state. Maryland continues to beat us down and I’m fed up. Maryland is a lost cause. I said that on here several years ago and was scoffed at. Look where we are now. And if anyone believes that MSP won’t enforce this crap, guess again. MSP loves Hogan and he loves them. Sources I’ve spoken to suggests that they hope it doesn’t pass, but are guessing it will. And none have said that they won’t enforce it. Not trying to create a divide between MSP or gun owners, just giving you reality.
I want to comply with all of Maryland’s gun laws by moving out of this state controlled by clowns.
whistlersmother
Peace through strength
Yes, I completely agree. As a Maryland native originally from the highlands, I am to the point of looking elsewhere to live for a variety of reasons, gun laws included. Maryland is not a friendly state for most people.
whistlersmother
Peace through strength
Well, it could have been lost on 30 Sept 2013...
Seriously. What kind of gun owner re-writes legislation to better take it up the keister?
Stick to the taxes.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
smokey
2A TEACHER
- Jan 31, 2008
- 31,534
There's no reporting requirement for "I destroyed it and disposed of it as per atf guidelines".
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
-
The Clock's Tickin': Be READY for Tomorrow!- Started by Target Sports USA
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
Tennessee legislature passes bill to arm teachers; leftist lose their minds- Started by jc1240
- Replies: 42