danb
dont be a dumbass
Here is the answer right here:
http://mdsp.maryland.gov/Document D... - Receivers of Banned Assault Long Guns.pdf
Clear as day.
AR lowers are 7 day wait, 77r, no HQL.
Last edited:
9mm AR Lower require HQL?
- Thread starter MazeOfTzeentch
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Here is the answer right here:
http://mdsp.maryland.gov/Document D... - Receivers of Banned Assault Long Guns.pdf
Clear as day.
AR lowers are 7 day wait, 77r, no HQL.
mdflyer
Member
- Nov 19, 2015
- 62
I think the thing is a dedicated 9mm Glock lower cannot be built into a Banned or a copy cat of a Colt AR the upper may determine the caliber but there is no way to run a Banned colt ar upper so does it fall under the Banned weapons?
danb
dont be a dumbass
huh?
A dedicated 9mm Glock lower can be built into a Glock. The presumption for pistol lowers is that they will be made into a pistol, so an HQL is required for those (+77r). Pistol lowers are not banned. They can be built into rifles or pistols. But a dedicated Glock lower will not end up as an AR, because an AR lower is completely different. For example, you can do this: http://mechtechsys.com/glock-carbine-conversion/ But, the result is not an AR, even if it cosmetically looks like one. Glock lower = HQL + wait + 77r.
An AR lower is not a Glock lower, so I am not really sure what you are asking. An AR lower can be made into a 9mm rifle, a 9mm pistol, or maybe some other caliber rifle pistol. None of which will be Glocks. AR lowers do not require HQL because the presumption is they are being made into rifles.
mdflyer
Member
- Nov 19, 2015
- 62
I meant ar style lowers that accept glock mags. They cannot use a banned upper ot ar15 magazine because it will not physically fit or operate so they cannot be considered a copy of the banned weapon.
Hence why I asked if there was a way to get a clarification. But that will probably just get them more regulated like a pistol brace clarification.
Hence why I asked if there was a way to get a clarification. But that will probably just get them more regulated like a pistol brace clarification.
danb
dont be a dumbass
AR "style" - with style being the operative word. If the magazine well is reduced to only take Glock mags, its not really an "AR" lower in the sense of the bulletin, nor a a Glock lower (last I checked Glocks do not have buffer tubes). if you talk to MDSP, they are going to give you the most conservative answer.
me, I would argue for cash and carry because 9mm rifles are not banned specifically. But I would also have proof of intent like a bill of sale for a 16", barrel, just in case.
me, I would argue for cash and carry because 9mm rifles are not banned specifically. But I would also have proof of intent like a bill of sale for a 16", barrel, just in case.
Biggfoot44
Ultimate Member
- Aug 2, 2009
- 33,137
Before there were dedicated " pistol cal only AR-ish " lowers taking Glock pattern mags , there were dedicated " pistol cal only AR-ish " lowers only taking Colt pattern magazines.
- Jul 29, 2014
- 49,983
Straight answer to what exactly? That dedicated lowers are cash and carry? They are. I have purchased them.
mdflyer
Member
- Nov 19, 2015
- 62
Outrider58, one shop I would like to buy one from dosent believe that and I would like to buy one of their products, hence why I asked where to get the specific information
