DC Circuit Affirms Conviction of Capitol Gun-Toter

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Inigoes

    Head'n for the hills
    MDS Supporter
    Dec 21, 2008
    49,575
    SoMD / West PA
    This Rodney Class case seems to be an ongoing 2A issue.

    After the case (16-424) was reversed and remanded by the SCOTUS on 2/21/2018. https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/16-424.html

    It appears the DC circuit is in open defiance of the SCOTUS.

    With the case before the federal appeals court for the second time, U.S. Circuit Judge Thomas Griffith wrote Friday that the parking lot where Class left his gun-loaded Jeep is exactly the type of place the Supreme Court’s Second Amendment precedent leaves open for gun regulations.

    “As for the Maryland Avenue parking lot, although it is not a government building, we conclude that it is sufficiently integrated with the Capitol for Heller I’s sensitive places exception to apply,” Griffith wrote, referring to the landmark gun case District of Columbia v. Heller. “Accordingly, we conclude that the Second Amendment does not give Class the right to bear arms in the Maryland Avenue parking lot.”

    Griffith also found that while determining the boundaries of the Capitol might be somewhat complicated, it is not so daunting a task that Class would have no way of knowing guns were banned from the parking lot. That conclusion defeated Class’ argument that his Fifth Amendment rights were violated because he did not have enough notice that having guns in the parking lot was illegal.


    https://www.courthousenews.com/dc-circuit-affirms-ban-on-guns-at-us-capitol/
     

    CrabcakesAndFootball

    Active Member
    Jun 14, 2017
    697
    After really limited analysis, I don't see it that way. Seems that DC Cir said Class waived right to challenge constitutionality of the statute under which he pleaded guilty. SCOTUS said Class did not waive those arguments and remanded. DC Cir then considered the merits of the constitutional arguments and rejected them.
     

    BeoBill

    Crank in the Third Row
    MDS Supporter
    Oct 3, 2013
    27,194
    南馬里蘭州鮑伊
    After really limited analysis, I don't see it that way. Seems that DC Cir said Class waived right to challenge constitutionality of the statute under which he pleaded guilty. SCOTUS said Class did not waive those arguments and remanded. DC Cir then considered the merits of the constitutional arguments and rejected them.

    If this is a p1ssing contest DC Cir may win. If this is a weenie measuring contest there will be trouble; DC cir may learn -0- isn't in charge any more.
     

    Kharn

    Ultimate Member
    Mar 9, 2008
    3,580
    Hazzard County
    A government-owned street parking lot 1000' from the building entrance is a very tenuous connection to a "sensitive place." I would love to see this one granted cert and knock out all the BS about excessively large no-go zones.
     

    press1280

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 11, 2010
    7,918
    WV
    A government-owned street parking lot 1000' from the building entrance is a very tenuous connection to a "sensitive place." I would love to see this one granted cert and knock out all the BS about excessively large no-go zones.

    It's essentially treating the government as a private property owner, as there's nothing sensitive about a parking lot.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,552
    Messages
    7,286,154
    Members
    33,476
    Latest member
    Spb5205

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom