Cody WIlson v State Department

Blacksmith101 said:

Can one of our members not behind the"Blue Wall" like in West VA, Texas, or elsewhere tell us what format are they selling and what the prices are?

Click to expand...

esqappellate said:

This banner is priceless.

Click to expand...

Kicken Wing said:

EXCELLENT press conference! Great watch. I tried logging in too. Behind the blue wall. As Cody Wilson said, those AG's are hi-5ing themselves over nothing. I saw a clip on Fox News today about this subject and news conference. Fox News has lost all 2A credibility in my opinion. The way Shepherd Smith reported it in about 60 seconds, it felt like I was watching MSNBC or CNN.

Click to expand...

swinokur said:

Shep Smith is the most left leaning news reader on Fox and makes no secret of his hate for Trump.

I don’t watch his program any longer

Click to expand...

Kicken Wing said:

Fox News has lost all 2A credibility in my opinion. The way Shepherd Smith reported it in about 60 seconds, it felt like I was watching MSNBC or CNN.

Click to expand...

themoose06 said:

Does anyone know if these files can be corrupted on download? Should one download these files sale 3 separate times and unzip them 3 separate times? Hypothetically of course, just to be sure all the files were good

Click to expand...

DC-W said:

Wilson made absolute hay out of Wallace a few weeks ago.

Really though, he's been stumping TV personalities all along. You can't find an interview where he's left without words.

Click to expand...

Rab1515 said:

Or you could just hash them....

Click to expand...

IDFInfantry said:

There are mirror sites in case https://codeisfreespeech.com/ is taken down or gets hacked!
The mirror sites include the hashes for the files

https://codeisfreespeech.ddns.net

https://cifs.ddns.net

Host the files or pay the tax for those who do! I did both! You're welcome!

Click to expand...

Rack&Roll said:

Thank you for this! /\ /\ /\ /\

Click to expand...

Here's the arguments from the State of Washington.

• Terrorists!
• Metal Detectors can't pick these up!
• A gun could be printed in a school if a school has a 3D printer!
• The felons and prohibited people!
• "3D printers will be embraced by criminal enterprises."
• "Ghost guns have been used in mass shootings in California."
• "The ability to use serial numbers to solve crimes would be greatly compromised." Further, forensic abilities are compromised, as barrels are not rifled and firing conditions can not be replicated. "It's frankly unsafe to fire some of these guns."
• "The undetectable firearms act does nothing to deter terrorists or bad actors from making a 3D weapon."
• It's going to hurt gun dealers who comply with the law.
• 3D guns are going to make the world more dangerous for the public and police officers.
• These were listed in the Munitions Act, then removed from the Act without due notice to Congress (a 30 day notice), a procedural argument. The judge actually shoots this point down, pointing out Congress isn't going to act.
• A procedural argument about the DoD not being involved in some type of process.
• "These need to be on the Munitions List for national security purposes."
• There's no reason for the government to have changed it's mind from 2015 until today.
• One rational for the government's decision to de-list these from the Munitions List is that they are "commonly available." The attorney for the State of Washington then argues, "Plastic guns are not commonly available."
• "The first amendment isn't a factor." "The government is not violating the first or second amendment."
• The President's tweet on 3D printed guns is "arbitrary and capricious".
• Jails/LE anyone who depends upon a metal detector, will need to develop a new technology or go to hand searches - leading to more costs.
• World Peace. These guns will go across our borders.
• There is no first amendment at play. "The nature of these guns is that you just press a button and it prints, this is not an expressive act." These files are "integral to criminal conduct" and exempt from the first amendment. These files are so close to plastic guns, they have no first amendment protection.
• "There's a substantial [government] interest in regulating the dissemination of military technology."
• The government's regulation here is only for internet postings, they [Defense Distributed] can still hand out this information locally.
• The judge doesn't need to consider First Amendment issues, only equities, i.e., does this impact the State, to file an injunction.
• "Real and present danger to the public safety - the President seems to agree." An injunction will not harm the government. If an injunction is issued it doesn't impact Defense Distributed's first amendment rights, because for the last 5 years they have not been able to publish.

Click to expand...