krucam
Ultimate Member
Too many "milestones" lately....1 Million, 100 pages, 2000th post....
Too many "milestones" lately....1 Million, 100 pages, 2000th post....
Too many "milestones" lately....1 Million, 100 pages, 2000th post....
The ONLY post that matters is... "I got my CCW, today, as a free Marylander, and didn't have to be subjected to the 'good and substantial reason' clause."
Counter sue them for malicious lawsuit, which it is. They will lose.
Are you buying???
Seriously... I doubt that's a bill any of us are willing to pay, when the solution is simple enough.
I agree that proper attribution should be sufficient protection, but the tactics of the "shyster attorneys" seems to be to beat folks down and drag every last cent out of them.
IMO, it's a fool's game to whiz into this particular wind.
Which is why suing them on contingency and/or with lawyers on the side of our cause is the way to go. Next question?Are you buying???
Seriously... I doubt that's a bill any of us are willing to pay, when the solution is simple enough.
so whats the deal? this thing got delayed again to 3/22? will be nice when it finally gets underway.
You beat me to the question...Are the Oral arguments open to the public or closed door. I can this being an entertaining session.
Are the Oral arguments open to the public or closed door. I can this being an entertaining session.
Usually open. Richards v Prieto in California (another carry/'good cause' case from Alan Gura and company) has orals tomorrow in San Fransisco and they are open to the public. But these are usually smallish courtrooms and no recording devices are allowed. So standing room only.
I, myself, would like to go.
You beat me to the question...
It'd be nice to get to see this in person. Nicer still if court proceedings were recorded and then YouTubed (but obviously some cases would need to be redacted for witness protection).
Not yet. But I am looking forward to the fact there will be oral arguments. They wouldn't be listed until they have an agreeable date.
If there were no orals, I would be really surprised.
a. The plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment- filed February 18, 2011;
b. The defendants’ opposition to the plaintiffs’ motion for summary
judgment and cross-motion for summary judgment- to be filed on or
before March 22, 2011;
c. The plaintiffs’ reply in support of their motion for summary judgment
and response in opposition to the defendants’ cross-motion for summary
judgment- to be filed on or before April 15, 2011; and
d. The defendants’ reply in support of their cross-motion for summary
judgment- to be filed on or before May 2, 2011.
It's the legal Konami Code.