imaoldcowhand
Active Member
- Aug 3, 2018
- 718
Wayne LaPierre editorial
- Thread starter imaoldcowhand
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
It's amazing how well the enforcement of those laws worked! Bringing it back sounds like a nobrainer. I wonder who's trying to protect who for this nonsense.
CrabcakesAndFootball
Active Member
- Jun 14, 2017
- 697
Thanks for the post; good editorial. The fact that the left wants more gun control without enforcing existing and proven gun legislation exposes them.
In my view, gun grabbers in large measure are motivated by a desire to spite conservatives -- not to reduce or eliminate "gun violence." They hate us, and they know these laws will disproportionately affect us.
In my view, gun grabbers in large measure are motivated by a desire to spite conservatives -- not to reduce or eliminate "gun violence." They hate us, and they know these laws will disproportionately affect us.
Muleskinner
Ultimate Member
This is straight out of the Alinsky playbook...They pass laws then refuse to enforce them so they can point to their own failure and say "gun control laws don't work, the only solution is to completely remove all firearms from the hands of the population for public safety"...the actual reason is to control every person from cradle to grave...and mark my words...the next time the left is in control in DC they are going to go nuclear on exactly this...they will destroy the NRA and then pass massive bans on guns and ammo...
aquaman
Ultimate Member
Our side is on Perpetual defense we've got a majority in the House and Senate and the presidency the NRA is well funded yet they never pushed for anything it's all status quo. I'm so tired of these articles I've read them for over 20 years nothing changes ,the NRA is a fraud the Republican party is a fraud as well.
They'll negotiate away our bump stocks and call that a ****ing win. We lose something and never gain anything.
They'll negotiate away our bump stocks and call that a ****ing win. We lose something and never gain anything.
Boondock Saint
Ultimate Member
iH8DemLibz
When All Else Fails.
BOOM!
I remember when everyone was excited about the Republican Trifecta Machine coming to town.
Christmas, New Years, and a 21st birthday all rolled into one.
Unrestricted national concealed carry. Unrestricted national reciprocity. Sound suppressors available 24/7/365 via vending machines. MG-42s and ammo to be rented at a dollar a day and used inside state parks.
We got nuthin. Not even the flow of C&R goodies. In fact, were going backwards.
TexDefender
Ultimate Member
- Feb 28, 2017
- 1,572
Enforcement of the laws on the books would affect thier base not us. That's why they don't want to do it. Remember the last MGA session when they were discussing the magazine ban. They didn't like minimum sentencing. Why was that? Or how about Baltimore when they were trying to get more time for people using a firearm during a crime or something like that. They dropped that because of what?
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
TexDefender
Ultimate Member
- Feb 28, 2017
- 1,572
I would love to hear your sure fire way to fix it then!
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
What was the old nra backed law? Project exhale I believe
That worked super great but somehow putting criminals, especially dangerous one using guns, has fallen out of favor
Didn’t that law clean Richmond right up? Now no one will use it?
What’s the reason to have laws if they aren’t to be used?
Stupid fvcking government
That worked super great but somehow putting criminals, especially dangerous one using guns, has fallen out of favor
Didn’t that law clean Richmond right up? Now no one will use it?
What’s the reason to have laws if they aren’t to be used?
Stupid fvcking government
- Dec 13, 2015
- 1,940
Link to article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/07/us/politics/jeff-sessions-gun-charges.html
The comments show the lack of understanding the NYT reader has about gun laws, or maybe lack of understanding of things in general. Why, why yes, it actually is perfectly legal for a private citizen to own a tank. If I win the lottery, I'm buying a couple for Mopar!
https://www.cnbc.com/2014/07/11/fleet-of-military-tanks-up-for-auction.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/07/us/politics/jeff-sessions-gun-charges.html
The comments show the lack of understanding the NYT reader has about gun laws, or maybe lack of understanding of things in general. Why, why yes, it actually is perfectly legal for a private citizen to own a tank. If I win the lottery, I'm buying a couple for Mopar!
https://www.cnbc.com/2014/07/11/fleet-of-military-tanks-up-for-auction.html
imaoldcowhand
Active Member
- Aug 3, 2018
- 718
imaoldcowhand
Active Member
- Aug 3, 2018
- 718
Yes, you can own a tank....
https://www.cnbc.com/video/2018/07/...imo-in-a-tank-with-arnold-schwarzenegger.html
- Nov 11, 2009
- 30,966
Yes! Neither party is a friend to liberty-minded Americans.
Both seek to expand the scope and reach of government control over our lives.
And the NRA cherry picks the freedoms it will support.
Nobody
Ultimate Member
- Jan 15, 2009
- 2,844
Project exile is racist......
Sarcasm
Nobody
Sarcasm
Nobody
Kicken Wing
Snakes and Sparklers
EXACTLY. The next dem to get elected president will certainly have part of his platform dedicated to the anti-gun movement. Sh*t is going to hit the fan for us law abiding gun owners and the whole country is going to have to take up the fight. ALL states will get a taste of what we, in Maryland, have dealt with for a long time. There will be no safe state for gun owners when the libs take over the White House again. I am not looking forward to the next democratic reign.
If the demorats do get the white house again plus congress and the order goes out to remove guns by force if necessary how many LEO will refuse the order and or stand up to their bosses and say no way, not to mention how bad will that order split this nation?? A major question is are those who own firearms willing to refuse the order and sad to say use them if necessary as well? If that does happen a lot of good people are going to pay the price.
Blacksmith101
Grumpy Old Man
- Jun 22, 2012
- 22,287
Project Exile worked in Richmond. It is needed in Baltimore.
Kicken Wing
Snakes and Sparklers
Removing guns by force on a national level would be the worst publicity stunt that the dems could ever have nightmares about. I think the citizens as a whole would start to realize how bad of an idea that is when their own friends and families start getting arrested for owning a weapon that was not-so-long-ago "legal". Can you imagine the number of arrests the Police Departments would have to make going door to door? The jails would fill quickly with the wrong people. The media would have a very hard time painting that scenario as a pretty picture.
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
Suggestions for a low powered, large objective rifle scope? (2 Viewers)- Started by E.Shell
- Replies: 10
-
-
Timonium Gun Show April 27-28 (Timonium Fairgrounds Exhibition Hall)
- Started by joro55
- Replies: 1
-
-
