Mr H
Banana'd
I was slightly concerned they were affiliated with Campaign for Liberty. C4L groups can be somewhat out of sync with one another, and some get downright odd.
10/06/2014 23
6 pg, 86.54 KB RESPONSE/ANSWER by Associated Gun Clubs of Baltimore, Incorporated, Atlantic Guns, Incorporated, Stephen V. Kolbe, Maryland Licensed Firearms Dealers Association, Incorporated, Maryland Shall Issue, Incorporated, Maryland State Rifle and Pistol Association, Incorporated, National Shooting Sports Foundation, Incorporated, Andrew C. Turner and Wink's Sporting Goods, Incorporated to notice requesting response [22], Motion to file amicus curiae brief [18]. Nature of response: in opposition. [14-1945] Marc Nardone
So the Plaintiffs object to the submission of the TYN Amicus on behalf of the Plaintiffs #23 in a lengthy and detailed manner.
The State responds with a simple "...the Defendants-Appellees do not object to the request for leave to file." in #24. That's it....
The Court in #25 then grants the Amicus request on behalf of the Plaintiffs, despite the objection of the Plaintiffs.
Upon consideration of submissions relative to the motion to file an amicus
curiae brief, the court grants the motion and accepts the amicus brief filed by
Traditionalist Youth Network, LLC.
WTF?!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!/1111111
Seriously, are these judges steering a rudderless ship or something? Yes, CA4 Judges, if your google fu is good...I am calling you out.
I thought deference would logically be given to the party for which the Amicus was trying to support? But what do I know, I'm just a juror not a judge.
Shameful.
They are on our side
http://www.tradyouth.org/
Their press release: http://www.tradyouth.org/2014/09/stand-for-the-2nd-amendment/#more-48472
They appear to want to help us.
Perhaps, but the Kolbe Attorney's don't want their help. They spent a lot of effort (filing #23 in Post 42 above) in opposing their Amicus as being beyond the scope of Kolbe.
The State said merely that they "don't object". The judicial scales should have clearly leaned towards the plaintiffs, but it went the other way. I'm scratching my head on this one.
They are from Indiana, with the only active chapter in Alberta, Canada?
TradYouth
P.O. Box 171
Paoli, IN 47454
Something doesn't smell right...
It gives the court lots of reasons to find against the plaintiffs that have no bearing on the actual case, more chances for smoke and mirrors to confuse the uninformed.
trackback at the bottom of that page links to a vlig called "aryan street" (wtf) and talks about that nut at towson that started the "white student union".
looks like a shit show for sure.
Just reading that has made my brain a little spongier.
Just reading that has made my brain a little spongier.