Kamala Harris comes right out and says it too.

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Uncle Duke

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 2, 2013
    11,664
    Not Far Enough from the City
    So now that Biden has come up with his anti-gun platform, we have three Democrat (Socialist) candidates who have openly called for "buy-backs"/confiscation of modern sporting rifles. I fear that this snowball is picking up speed and adding more flakes as it rolls downhill.

    The grabbers have certainly come out of the closet regarding their true intentions.

    Hard to tell where this goes from here. Perhaps the Supreme Court will intercede. But for reasons oftentimes speculated upon, though largely I believe still very much open to debate, the Court has been reluctant to rule to date. Perhaps more concerning is that the Court to date has not halted increasing contention with the most obvious and most simplistic of rulings, and the ruling we all want. That is, "shall not be infringed", means just exactly what it says.

    Perhaps where this is heading is that we will one day tell the grabbers that they can legislate whatever they want. It increasingly appears that they're likely to do this anyway. Maybe even sooner rather than later.

    Then there's the topic of laws and the weight of laws generally in this country today, as they don't carry either the weight or the enforcement they once did. Look at immigration, where the left simply ignores and indeed openly circumvents any laws they don't like. And they do so with almost absolute impunity.

    Should we not comply with future legislation, the ball will be squarely back in their court regarding any enforcement next steps.

    One thing seems certain. There's a stalemate at present, but with an increasingly emboldened left, and one that has largely been left unchecked. Which almost invariably means that, in one form or another, we're one step closer to perhaps a bigger fight.
     

    rbird7282

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Dec 6, 2012
    18,530
    Columbia
    The grabbers have certainly come out of the closet regarding their true intentions.

    Hard to tell where this goes from here. Perhaps the Supreme Court will intercede. But for reasons oftentimes speculated upon, though largely I believe still very much open to debate, the Court has been reluctant to rule to date. Perhaps more concerning is that the Court to date has not halted increasing contention with the most obvious and most simplistic of rulings, and the ruling we all want. That is, "shall not be infringed", means just exactly what it says.

    Perhaps where this is heading is that we will one day tell the grabbers that they can legislate whatever they want. It increasingly appears that they're likely to do this anyway. Maybe even sooner rather than later.

    Then there's the topic of laws and the weight of laws generally in this country today, as they don't carry either the weight or the enforcement they once did. Look at immigration, where the left simply ignores and indeed openly circumvents any laws they don't like. And they do so with almost absolute impunity.

    Should we not comply with future legislation, the ball will be squarely back in their court regarding any enforcement next steps.

    One thing seems certain. There's a stalemate at present, but with an increasingly emboldened left, and one that has largely been left unchecked. Which almost invariably means that, in one form or another, we're one step closer to perhaps a bigger fight.



    Very well stated


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     

    rockstarr

    Major Deplorable
    Feb 25, 2013
    4,592
    The Bolshevik Lands
    I hope they all keep lurching left. making thinsg easier to prove our case.

    Kamala is trying damn hard for that VP slot at this point.

    Did booker raise enough money to keep moving forward?
     

    Doctor_M

    Certified Mad Scientist
    MDS Supporter
    The NSSF puts the number of AR and AR variants @ around 16 million.

    That wouldn't surprise me.... as I said, I think my 11M extrapolation is conservative. The more the better. :D

    I know it is a tangent to this thread, but since there was a detailed discussion on the number of evil black rifles in private hands up thread:

    NSSF just released a new study. Estimate number of firearms in civilian possession from 986-2018: 422.9 million.

    Total number of modern sporting rifles: 17.7 million.

    That there is a lot of firepower in the hands of Mr. and Mrs. America. God Bless!
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    274,915
    Messages
    7,258,452
    Members
    33,348
    Latest member
    Eric_Hehl

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom