SCOTUS rules against Red Flags

Name Taken · Aug 8, 2021

Allen65 said:
I don't see much difference between a coerced surrender under threat of imprisonment for contempt of court, and confiscation.

So you don't see the difference between a court issuing a search and seizure warrant as opposed to the police just rushing into someones house and taking contraband?

One is overseen by a detached, judicial officer (in theory at least), and the other is not. Pretty basic stuff.

Allen65 · Aug 8, 2021

Name Taken said:
So you don't see the difference between a court issuing a search and seizure warrant as opposed to the police just rushing into someones house and taking contraband?

One is overseen by a detached, judicial officer (in theory at least), and the other is not. Pretty basic stuff.

Sorry. Just to clarify, I was referring to court-ordered confiscation (i.e. seizure warrant), not LEOs acting independently.

Odarlin1 · Aug 8, 2021

fred2207 said:
Yes it is... However, the OP post is misleading as all SCOTUS ruled on was that it is not legal for police to confiscate your firearms without a warrant unless a crime has been committed or in progress.. At least that's the way I read it.

You are correct. My error. Thanks

bluedog46 · Aug 15, 2021

i always had due process concerns about this. I do get some people should nto have guns in some sitautinos but i think the burden should be in the state lik eyou are makeing threats that can be proven anything involving family and spouses can have someone lying.

SCOTUS rules against Red Flags

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

Name Taken

Ultimate Member

Allen65

Ultimate Member

Odarlin1

Ultimate Member

bluedog46

Ultimate Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Latest threads

Forum statistics

Share this page