Go Back   Maryland Shooters > Gun Rights and Legislation > National 2A Issues

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 9th, 2016, 09:37 AM #1
esqappellate's Avatar
esqappellate esqappellate is offline
President, MSI
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6,097
esqappellate esqappellate is offline
President, MSI
esqappellate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6,097
En banc Decision in Peruta -- a loss

Ugh
Attached Images
File Type: pdf Peruata En Banc Decision.pdf (2.75 MB, 1570 views)
__________________
This may sound like legal advice, but it isn't. Don't rely on it. Hire your own counsel.
esqappellate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9th, 2016, 09:38 AM #2
highli99's Avatar
highli99 highli99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: West Side
Posts: 2,490
highli99 highli99 is offline
Senior Member
highli99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: West Side
Posts: 2,490
Damn.
highli99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9th, 2016, 09:38 AM #3
KevinK KevinK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Carroll County, Md
Posts: 1,684
KevinK KevinK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Carroll County, Md
Posts: 1,684
Quote:
The en banc court affirmed the district courts’ judgments
and held that there is no Second Amendment right for
members of the general public to carry concealed firearms in
public.
KevinK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9th, 2016, 09:42 AM #4
rockstarr's Avatar
rockstarr rockstarr is offline
Major Deplorable
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: The Bolshevik Lands
Posts: 2,653
rockstarr rockstarr is offline
Major Deplorable
rockstarr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: The Bolshevik Lands
Posts: 2,653
the ammo box is coming soon my brothers and sisters
__________________
Be a humble person, for you are no better or anymore special than the person next to you...
rockstarr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9th, 2016, 09:43 AM #5
zoostation's Avatar
zoostation zoostation is offline


 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Abingdon
Posts: 18,529
Images: 12
zoostation zoostation is offline


zoostation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Abingdon
Posts: 18,529
Images: 12
On a cursory read the only small good thing I can say is at least they went out of their way to state they were only ruling on concealed carry and were not touching upon visible carry.

Sucks but it's the Ninth Circuit. Not surprised.
__________________
"I have been scientifically studying the traits and dispositions of the 'lower animals' (so-called), and contrasting them with the traits and dispositions of man. I find the result humiliating to me." -Mark Twain, 1896.
zoostation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9th, 2016, 09:44 AM #6
DC-W's Avatar
DC-W DC-W is offline
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 18,919
DC-W DC-W is offline
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
DC-W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 18,919
Elections have consequences...

Quote:
We do not reach the question whether the Second
Amendment protects some ability to carry firearms in public,
such as open carry. That question was left open by the
Supreme Court in Heller, and we have no need to answer it
here. Because Plaintiffs challenge only policies governing
concealed carry, we reach only the question whether the
Second Amendment protects, in any degree, the ability to
carry concealed firearms in public. Based on the
overwhelming consensus of historical sources, we conclude
that the protection of the Second Amendment — whatever the
scope of that protection may be — simply does not extend to
the carrying of concealed firearms in public by members of
the general public.
The Second Amendment may or may not protect, to some
degree, a right of a member of the general public to carry
firearms in public. But the existence vel non of such a right,
and the scope of such a right, are separate from and
independent of the question presented here. We hold only
that there is no Second Amendment right for members of the
general public to carry concealed firearms in public.
Case: 10-56971, 06/09/2016, ID: 10007709, DktEntry: 333-1, Page 19 of 89
(19 of 190
DC-W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9th, 2016, 09:47 AM #7
Klunatic's Avatar
Klunatic Klunatic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Montgomery Cty
Posts: 2,720
Klunatic Klunatic is offline
Senior Member
Klunatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Montgomery Cty
Posts: 2,720
I guess we will have G&S permits for voting, free speech and attending church as well right?
__________________
kLunatic
SAF Life Member
MSI Executive Member
NRA Life Member
Utah Permit
Maryland 365 Unrestricted permit Rejected 5/13/13

“A citizen may not be required to offer a `good and substantial reason’ why he should be permitted to exercise his rights, The right’s existence is all the reason he needs.”U.S. District Judge Benson Everett Legg, 5 Mar 2012
Klunatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9th, 2016, 09:53 AM #8
highli99's Avatar
highli99 highli99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: West Side
Posts: 2,490
highli99 highli99 is offline
Senior Member
highli99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: West Side
Posts: 2,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klunatic View Post
I guess we will have G&S permits for voting, free speech and attending church as well right?
You can pray if you are disabled. If not, no God for you.
highli99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9th, 2016, 09:56 AM #9
swinokur's Avatar
swinokur swinokur is offline
In a State of Denial
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Stalag Montgomery
Posts: 38,124
swinokur swinokur is offline
In a State of Denial
swinokur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Stalag Montgomery
Posts: 38,124
hopefully a CERT petition will be forthcoming but with a 4-4 split, doesn't seem worth the effort.
__________________
swinokur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9th, 2016, 10:08 AM #10
DC-W's Avatar
DC-W DC-W is offline
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 18,919
DC-W DC-W is offline
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
DC-W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 18,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by swinokur View Post
hopefully a CERT petition will be forthcoming but with a 4-4 split, doesn't seem worth the effort.
Gut check time for sure.

Big gamble.
DC-W is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Home Page > Forum List > Gun Rights and Legislation > National 2A Issues


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2017, Congregate Media, LP Privacy Policy Terms of Service