CITIZEN GROUPS UNITE TO CHALLENGE MARYLAND FIREARMS BAN IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT

XCheckR · Sep 27, 2013

OCCBrian said:
2 different issues. I think it is safe to assume that HQL will be challenged separately.

Benanov said:
You don't need training to buy long guns. This is the long gun suit.

The handgun suit is coming. You can have a number of lawsuits in play over different topics.

THANKS, sometimes the brain doesnt put 2 and 2 together so fast

rwbow1969 · Sep 27, 2013

Benanov said:
You don't need training to buy long guns. This is the long gun suit.The handgun suit is coming. You can have a number of lawsuits in play over different topics.

This lawsuit also covers handguns see page 12 of 34, .28 iv, a semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds.

This lawsuit covers all firearms.

I would suggest everyone take the time and read over the lawsuit. http://www.associatedgunclubs.org/le...al_Lawsuit.pdf

ktigerJ · Sep 27, 2013

Don't know if anyone has seen it but Fox News is running the story here.

Robert1955 · Sep 27, 2013

CrazySanMan said:
Riddle me this, Batman, if the NRA isn't involved in the lawsuit, how would they know this???

Who cares..... It was stated they were not a NAMED party to THIS lawsuit, not that they were not assisting. I am thinking this is just the first "SHOT" over the bow so to speak to dissolve this abomination of a law and we will be seeing more come in after the 1st actually gets here. I for one plan to apply for my HQL on 10/1 and 10,000 or more of us should do the same!!!

Mr H · Sep 27, 2013

rwbow1969 said:
This lawsuit also covers handguns see page 12 of 34, .28 iv, a semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds.

This lawsuit covers all firearms.

I would suggest everyone take the time and read over the lawsuit. http://www.associatedgunclubs.org/le...al_Lawsuit.pdf

Probably more accurate to call it the "banned firearm/magazine suit".

Then, the "handgun suit" might just be next.

Uncle Duke · Sep 27, 2013

XCheckR said:
I read the suit, there was nothing in there regarding the cost of the license, and the undue burdon for range/training/etc on individual. Will this be addressed in future suites (post Oct 1)

Buckle up friend. Just the very first mile of a very long ride. The pre-October 1 gun purchases have been made by many and most. Time now to open up the wallets to buy gas for the rides to the courts.

Sthomas229 · Sep 27, 2013

rwbow1969 said:
This lawsuit also covers handguns see page 12 of 34, .28 iv, a semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds.

This lawsuit covers all firearms.

I would suggest everyone take the time and read over the lawsuit. http://www.associatedgunclubs.org/le...al_Lawsuit.pdf

Actually, it's a BANNED guns and magazines suit.

eruby · Sep 27, 2013

To everyone biitching about NRA this, or MSI that, why not just STFU and write a check/make a donation.

Whether named in the suit or not, all the groups are on our side, so if YOU'RE not with us, your against us.

rant off.

TxAggie · Sep 27, 2013

I think many are missing the subtlety of this particular angle if the suit. This filing is specifically aimed at:
ADA implications if the bill (non standard magazines)
Interstate commerce (banned rifles being a key income source for local FFL's)
And a direct association of "common use" firearms as defined in Heller.

As others have mentioned, this is not the primary 2A suit, that one is sure to follow. Keep your shorts on, I predict within two months you'll need a spreadsheet to follow all of the different filings.

DC-W · Sep 27, 2013

The pdf doesn't seem to be available from that above link. Can anyone post it here?

annihilation-time · Sep 27, 2013

eruby said:
To everyone biitching about NRA this, or MSI that, why not just STFU and write a check/make a donation.

Whether named in the suit or not, all the groups are on our side, so if YOU'RE not with us, your against us.

rant off.

Exactly.

Some people need to chill out.

Isn't David Keene a Marylander? While not the NRA president anymore, I'm sure he won't let Maryland get away with this. At least not without a serious fight.

Robert1955 · Sep 27, 2013

kiriyama9000 said:
The pdf doesn't seem to be available from that above link. Can anyone post it here?

Try the link in the very first post of this thread.

NavyATFP · Sep 27, 2013

pdf of the case

orangeflameshadow · Sep 27, 2013

Don't give up, never give up!

Uncle Duke · Sep 27, 2013

Off to AGC this morning with check in hand to help with litigation. Some things in life you just want to deliver personally. Best check I'll write all year! Freedom has never come cheap.

A heart felt THANK YOU to the folks on point with this!

Lou45 · Sep 27, 2013

Indiana Jones said:
I hope there are so many lawsuits that Frosh and OweMalley have to check into a mental health facility.

"Nurse Ratchett I want my cigarettes!!!!!!"

Eruby (below) beat me to it...............

eruby said:
"Thank you. Ahhh, Juicy Fruit."

Check being dropped off at Lou's this afternoon.

eruby said:
To everyone biitching about NRA this, or MSI that, why not just STFU and write a check/make a donation.

Whether named in the suit or not, all the groups are on our side, so if YOU'RE not with us, your against us.

rant off.

You tell 'em eruby..............

Mr H · Sep 27, 2013

TxAggie said:
I think many are missing the subtlety of this particular angle if the suit. This filing is specifically aimed at:
ADA implications if the bill (non standard magazines)
Interstate commerce (banned rifles being a key income source for local FFL's)
And a direct association of "common use" firearms as defined in Heller.

As others have mentioned, this is not the primary 2A suit, that one is sure to follow. Keep your shorts on, I predict within two months you'll need a spreadsheet to follow all of the different filings.

Thanks for mentioning Commerce... I meant to in an earlier post and didn't.

This has the makings of a huge deal.

pecormd · Sep 27, 2013

Outstanding you have my full support! :thumbsup:

Kharn · Sep 27, 2013

TxAggie said:
I think many are missing the subtlety of this particular angle if the suit. This filing is specifically aimed at:
ADA implications if the bill (non standard magazines)
Interstate commerce (banned rifles being a key income source for local FFL's)
And a direct association of "common use" firearms as defined in Heller.

As others have mentioned, this is not the primary 2A suit, that one is sure to follow. Keep your shorts on, I predict within two months you'll need a spreadsheet to follow all of the different filings.

And equal protection, retired cops are the same as non-LEOs legally, but the law makes them a different class.

DC-W · Sep 27, 2013

NavyATFP said:
pdf of the case

Thank you!

CITIZEN GROUPS UNITE TO CHALLENGE MARYLAND FIREARMS BAN IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

Ultimate Member

Get Wiffit

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Banana'd

Ultimate Member

none

Confederate Jew

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

MOLON LABE

Ultimate Member

Banned

Attachments

Member

Ultimate Member

R.I.P.

Banana'd

Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics