Legal question about traveling with a firearm

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • MRA

    Active Member
    Dec 10, 2010
    706
    Damascus
    Okay, I understand the right to travel with a properly stored weapon & passing through various states. If we stop with our camper (even for one night) in a state where I do not have a concealed carry permit, do local laws come into effect immediately when we stop for the night? If I understand things correctly, this could be a problem in some states (New York, etc.). While on a trip, I would consider our camper our residence. Does this change things?
     

    mikec

    Ultimate Member
    Dec 1, 2007
    11,453
    Off I-83
    Having or not having a carry permit doesn't matter.

    In NY you must first establish residency before you can apply for a pistol permit. You also must have a NY permit to possess a handgun in NY.

    Technically, in MD, you must also establish residence before buying a firearm.

    do local laws come into effect immediately when we stop for the night?

    I would say yes.
     

    QuebecoisWolf

    Ultimate Member
    May 14, 2008
    3,767
    Anne Arundel
    Bad idea IMO

    Very bad idea for pistols. Hypothetically speaking, if you're a Virginia CCW permit holder and you drive from Virginia to Maine, nearly every state you could pass through is going to have a serious problem with you having a loaded handgun, even if you don't leave the car:

    -Maryland
    -New Jersey
    -New York
    -Connecticut
    -Massachusetts
    -New Hampshire
    -Maine

    Edit: As a rule of thumb, interstate commerce only protects you if you're bring along a gun for a specific reason such as a shooting competition, hunting, etc. Some states, especially out west, are pretty cool about out-of-state CCW permit holders visiting. Other states don't give a nat's toenail about what the Federal Government has to say. Massachusetts, New York, Washington DC, New Jersey, Connecticut, and California have laws that are so restrictive that they are openly hostile to non-resident gun owners.
     

    pcfixer

    Ultimate Member
    May 24, 2009
    5,954
    Marylandstan
    It's called FOPA.

    The Firearm Owners' Protection Act (FOPA), Pub.L. 99-308, 100 Stat. 449, enacted May 19, 1986, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 921 et seq., is a United States federal law that revised many statutes in the Gun Control Act of 1968.



    Safe Passage" provision This section requires expansion with:
    examples and additional citations.

    One of the law's provisions was that persons traveling from one place to another cannot be incarcerated for a firearms offense in a state that has strict gun control laws if the traveler is just passing through (short stops for food and gas) and the firearms and ammunition are not immediately accessible, unloaded and, in the case of a vehicle without a compartment separate from the driver’s compartment, in a locked container.[6]
     

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,489
    Westminster USA
    The issue is stopping overnight in a state that prohibits it. you're screwed. No FOPA protection whatsoever. Again, bad idea if you are not traveling through the state.
     

    MDFF2008

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 12, 2008
    24,766
    The good news is most anti-2a states are small.

    Driving from Maryland to Vermont can be done in 9-10 hours.

    PA is a safe haven you can use to stop in if you can't do it all in one day.
     

    montoya32

    Ultimate Member
    Patriot Picket
    Jun 16, 2010
    11,311
    Harford Co
    Spending the night in a state sounds like "passing through" to me. As long as you don't tote it around, why would you be too concerned? Not bashing anyone in this specific post, but I think we all worry way too much about this type of thing. How many criminals carry and never get caught until they commit a crime? I'm not saying to blatently break the law, but if you're traveling and happen to have to stay over in a state where you cannot legally carry, then tuck the firearm away and leave it be.

    This is exactly why we need a national reciprocity or national carry law. I think it's more dangerous to have citizens loading and unloading guns, leaving them in vehicles, probably inadequately secured, and not understanding local laws.

    Charge us $500 every 3 years for a national CCW permit and be done with it.
     

    MDFF2008

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 12, 2008
    24,766
    I think the issue is some of those states are so anti-gun, they will take the most strict and infringing interpretation they can. A couple (MA and NY and possibly NJ) have tried to claim they don't have to obey FOPA.

    It is being a bit paranoid, but I would hate for someone to come here and get advice that while correct, requires on a loser reading of FOPA than a judge might read in those states.
     

    montoya32

    Ultimate Member
    Patriot Picket
    Jun 16, 2010
    11,311
    Harford Co
    I think the issue is some of those states are so anti-gun, they will take the most strict and infringing interpretation they can. A couple (MA and NY and possibly NJ) have tried to claim they don't have to obey FOPA.

    It is being a bit paranoid, but I would hate for someone to come here and get advice that while correct, requires on a loser reading of FOPA than a judge might read in those states.

    Too true.
     

    NY Transplant

    Wabbit Season/Duck Season
    Apr 2, 2010
    2,810
    Westminster, MD
    Wasn't there a case where someone that was transporting a handgun was diverted to Newark airport in NJ and the person had to stay overnight eventually charged with illegal possession?
     

    QuebecoisWolf

    Ultimate Member
    May 14, 2008
    3,767
    Anne Arundel
    I think the issue is some of those states are so anti-gun, they will take the most strict and infringing interpretation they can. A couple (MA and NY and possibly NJ) have tried to claim they don't have to obey FOPA.

    It is being a bit paranoid, but I would hate for someone to come here and get advice that while correct, requires on a loser reading of FOPA than a judge might read in those states.

    True, true. Paranoia is a survival trait. I'd rather err on the side of caution. We also had a thread a little while back (might even still be alive) about how PG County's activist police chiefs publicly announced that they didn't give a hill of beans about the AG's opinion. They'd enforce their reading of the law and deal with the fallout later.

    But, to get back to the topic, let's see the text from FOPA:

    § 926A. Interstate transportation of firearms
    Notwithstanding any other provision of any law or any rule or regulation of a State or any political subdivision thereof, any person who is not otherwise prohibited by this chapter from transporting, shipping, or receiving a firearm shall be entitled to transport a firearm for any lawful purpose from any place where he may lawfully possess and carry such firearm to any other place where he may lawfully possess and carry such firearm if, during such transportation the firearm is unloaded, and neither the firearm nor any ammunition being transported is readily accessible or is directly accessible from the passenger compartment of such transporting vehicle: Provided, That in the case of a vehicle without a compartment separate from the driver’s compartment the firearm or ammunition shall be contained in a locked container other than the glove compartment or console.


    Hmm... this is as clear of an answer a jar of black paint. The question I have for the OP is why are you transporting the gun? Self-defense isn't considered a "lawful purpose" in every state (including MD) and might be the place where you run into trouble. If you're just tooling around the country in your RV and you drive from MD to NY, the law may consider NY your "destination," even if you're planning to drive to Michigan the next day. This would be a good test case if you enjoy wresting with legal gorillas. Do we have any amateur (or professional) legal experts in the house who know of test cases like this?
     

    mikec

    Ultimate Member
    Dec 1, 2007
    11,453
    Off I-83
    Wasn't there a case where someone that was transporting a handgun was diverted to Newark airport in NJ and the person had to stay overnight eventually charged with illegal possession?

    Yes, because he went and picked up his luggage that contained his handguns. If he had first contacted the police at the airport and told them of his situation and the police took possession of the firearms, even though he was in NJ, he would have been OK.

    What I take from that case is that the gun owner stopped traveling and went to a hotel to sleep. At that point his limited protection under FOPA ended.

    What that tells me, is if you are driving through NJ or NY and have car trouble or get into bad weather, you should contact the local police so that they can secure your firearms until you can safely begin traveling again. Anyone want to bet how that will turn out????
     

    rglrguy

    Active Member
    Dec 15, 2010
    526
    Harford
    Yes, because he went and picked up his luggage that contained his handguns. If he had first contacted the police at the airport and told them of his situation and the police took possession of the firearms, even though he was in NJ, he would have been OK.

    What I take from that case is that the gun owner stopped traveling and went to a hotel to sleep. At that point his limited protection under FOPA ended.

    What that tells me, is if you are driving through NJ or NY and have car trouble or get into bad weather, you should contact the local police so that they can secure your firearms until you can safely begin traveling again. Anyone want to bet how that will turn out????

    These are damned if you do, damned if you don't situations. I say make this decision for yourself prior to traveling and don't post it on here. Staying in NY would probably not be in your best interest. I recommend choosing a more gun friendly state and spending your hard earned money there. Make sure to write the local paper of the district you would have stayed in and let them know why you chose a different locale.:)
     

    mikec

    Ultimate Member
    Dec 1, 2007
    11,453
    Off I-83
    These are damned if you do, damned if you don't situations. I say make this decision for yourself prior to traveling and don't post it on here. Staying in NY would probably not be in your best interest. I recommend choosing a more gun friendly state and spending your hard earned money there. Make sure to write the local paper of the district you would have stayed in and let them know why you chose a different locale.:)

    You see, I do have to travel to NY, now and then, because mom and other family is there. However I do know enough not to take a firearm when I go, because I dealt with their gun laws for 20 or so years.

    As far as writing newspapers and telling them about lost revenue, forget it. NY is worse than MD in that NYC is the main power in the state, compared to PG and Montgomery County and Baltimore City in MD.
     

    MDFF2008

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 12, 2008
    24,766
    You see, I do have to travel to NY, now and then, because mom and other family is there. However I do know enough not to take a firearm when I go, because I dealt with their gun laws for 20 or so years.

    As far as writing newspapers and telling them about lost revenue, forget it. NY is worse than MD in that NYC is the main power in the state, compared to PG and Montgomery County and Baltimore City in MD.

    There response would be to keep your poor hating, gay bashing, bible thumping worthless God loving piece of shit hate mongering ass out of our utopia.
     

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,489
    Westminster USA
    Google Revell vs Port Authority of NY and NJ. SCOTUS ruled the issue was ACCESS to the weapon. I don't know if stopping and leaving the firearm locked in your trunk is ACCESS. Seems to me it might be, but I am not going to try and see either.
     

    QuebecoisWolf

    Ultimate Member
    May 14, 2008
    3,767
    Anne Arundel
    Google Revell vs Port Authority of NY and NJ. SCOTUS ruled the issue was ACCESS to the weapon. I don't know if stopping and leaving the firearm locked in your trunk is ACCESS. Seems to me it might be, but I am not going to try and see either.

    Here's a nice link for all of the lazy folk out there.

    Caution: May induce vomiting. Do not read if you just ate lunch.

    http://warshawskylawfirm.com/lawyer/2011/01/21/Civil_Rights_Law/U.S._Supreme_Court_Denies_Cert_In_Important_Gun_Rights_Case,_Revell_v._Port_Authority_of_New_York___New_Jersey._bl1727.htm
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,603
    Messages
    7,288,027
    Members
    33,485
    Latest member
    Stew

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom