Yo WHO'S MAN'S IS THIS?
If anyone still has any doubts about Biden...
- Thread starter TheOriginalMexicanBob
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Yo WHO'S MAN'S IS THIS?
randomuser
Ultimate Member
You mean like bump stocks and pistol braces?
They won't do it all at once. law by law, part by part.
Nobody is going to fight over pistol braces
Then they move on to the next thing to ban
nobody will fight over pencil barrels being banned
Then they move on to the next thing to ban
Nobody will fight over ar15 lower parts kits
Then they move on to the next thing to ban
Nobody will fight over 30 round magazines banned
Then the move on to the next thing to ban
They won't come out and tell you that every single gun is banned. Even in Austraila you can have guns, but under super duper lock and key etc.
Now your guns stay hidden for the revolt right? But the truth is that if there were going to be a revolt there would first have to be words had like >>>do x,y,z and there will be a repercussion of X,y,z <<<That has not happened.
In fact, quite the opposite. They see that WWNC, but it does not matter. We still permit them to do what they do without any tar and feathers, so they will continue on.
Don't worry though, the next generation or the one after that will be so distanced from the true meaning of 2a that the bans will actually work.
It's not about taking ALL of your guns. It's about taking the guns from your kids and grandkids. It's easier that way.
AlbertJConifer
Member
- Nov 10, 2020
- 17
Doesn't matter a hill of beans what you and your progressive gun owning friends support. Not a one of you have a vote in congress or a pen in the oval office.
You side with a party and support the candidates from a party that do have those votes and that pen. Thats who matters when it comes to who does and doesn't support gun ownership. Progressive gun owners are worse than fudds.
You side with a party and support the candidates from a party that do have those votes and that pen. Thats who matters when it comes to who does and doesn't support gun ownership. Progressive gun owners are worse than fudds.
This post brought to you by
Attachments
Oh3
Member
Never had a doubt about what Biden, the Demorats/progressives have in mind. They know they can't go with confiscation so they'll do like they always do. Chip away little by little until the last bite is left then finish it off. They start out with over-reaching ideas then settle for that nibble knowing they made "progress". They are in it for the long haul and until things some of them arereversed, it doesn't look good for us.
Muleskinner
Ultimate Member
You have no idea what you're talking about. Well over 90% of firearms in this country are in the hands of Republicans. There are relatively few left-wing progressives that own guns let alone approve of their ownership. I'm assuming that you vote for Democrats and against your own rights and the rights of all gun owners. Thanks for that
endbrought
Member
- Aug 20, 2020
- 1
Utterly unsurprising that this is what's coming.
Oh3
Member
It's not just "someone in Biden's administration". It is everyone in Biden's administration. period. the end.
Muleskinner
Ultimate Member
I've posted this before but I'll do it again. There won't ever be any "gun confiscation".. not nationally anyway. The government doesn't need to kick in your doors to force you to turn in your firearms..
They will simply weaponize the IRS and this is how it will work:
Congress passes a law banning the civilian ownership of some or all firearms. Yes I know it would be unconstitutional but when has that stopped them in the past?
Within that law they designate the IRS to contact your employer, your bank, and any other financial institutions with which you have funds. They will order those institutions and your employer to withhold your pay or funds from your bank account or retirement account until you comply and turn your firearms into the local or State Police. They will literally attempt to starve you into compliance.
I would like to think that's when patriotic American gun owners pull on their boots grab their rifles and take care of business however after perusing these forms, the Facebook pages of several other states gun owners and private forums across the country it's clear to me that it's such a law wherever to be passed many gun owners would be tripping over each other to be first in line to turn in their firearms.. sure some would fight but probably not enough..
They will simply weaponize the IRS and this is how it will work:
Congress passes a law banning the civilian ownership of some or all firearms. Yes I know it would be unconstitutional but when has that stopped them in the past?
Within that law they designate the IRS to contact your employer, your bank, and any other financial institutions with which you have funds. They will order those institutions and your employer to withhold your pay or funds from your bank account or retirement account until you comply and turn your firearms into the local or State Police. They will literally attempt to starve you into compliance.
I would like to think that's when patriotic American gun owners pull on their boots grab their rifles and take care of business however after perusing these forms, the Facebook pages of several other states gun owners and private forums across the country it's clear to me that it's such a law wherever to be passed many gun owners would be tripping over each other to be first in line to turn in their firearms.. sure some would fight but probably not enough..
TheOriginalMexicanBob
Ultimate Member
Gun owners will be "asked" to "compromise" once again...and when we refuse we'll be painted as "partisan" and opposed to "common sense" gun "safety" laws. We know that's all a lie...always has been a lie...and always will be a lie.
What the gun banners will do...as they always do when they can't get their way otherwise...is to sit and wait for the next tragedy that involves deaths from gunfire...as long as those deaths were committed by the "appropriate" people that fit their narrative and not simple criminals. They will then dance in the blood of the victims for political purposes...like they always do.
What the gun banners will do...as they always do when they can't get their way otherwise...is to sit and wait for the next tragedy that involves deaths from gunfire...as long as those deaths were committed by the "appropriate" people that fit their narrative and not simple criminals. They will then dance in the blood of the victims for political purposes...like they always do.
Muleskinner
Ultimate Member
So tell me again how there will never be gun confiscation by the Biden/Harris administration? You do realize the mandatory and confiscation are synonymous in this context right?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...supports-mandatory-buyback-of-assault-weapons
doc.morrison
Member
It is war.
War is hell. I still solemnly pledge my life for the Constitution of the United States of America. So help me God!
And Shazam, there was a convergence.
Y’all feel it too?
Feel the force. Use the Force.
Y’all feel it too?
Feel the force. Use the Force.
After reading these pages? What you should be getting from that is what people actually ASK you: genuine puzzlement over just who you're saying that other people (never you, it seems) should go and shoot after they pull those boots on. So, let's say the IRS does what you're talking about. Who should that gun owner go and shoot? Specifically, I mean. You sound like you've got it all planned out, but you won't share. What does "taking care of business" mean, when you use that phrase? Or is it just Keyboard Warrior Operator Chest Thumping?
Have to give Feinstein credit. She's the only somewhat honest one of them all.
Oh3
Member
They don't want to take away all guns, just everyone else's.
PowPow
Where's the beef?
I must have missed the post in this thread that requested a shinebox group buy.
pcfixer
Ultimate Member
yea. The progressive left marxist can do EO's. Point is WHO will obey that illegal and immoral order to do so. A few at best, will not happen on wholesale level. 5 years ago Connecticut confiscation didn't happen either. 2 years ago New Jersey tried confiscation.
I'm in "Will Not Comply"
- Nov 11, 2009
- 30,871
In Australia, the govt didn't "sit and wait".
They tried to pass a gun ban; Tasmania told them to eff off, so the ban failed.
Before long, there was a setup by unnamed presumably govt entities, appropriately enought in Port Arthur, Tasmania. Pre-positioned refrigerated mortary truck on the scene, a "madman" whacked a bunch of people, and - PRESTO! - nationwide call for a ban.
Very hincky scenario; I know that many high-up Aussies are convinced it was govt setup; one guy believes the CIA was involved, in an advisory capacity.
One cop, Andrew MacGregor, has looked into this; link:
http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/conspiracy/conspiracy/parthur1.html
There are some who believe this was a trial run, prepping for USA gun ban.
.
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest posts
-
-
-
Awareness/Mindset/Q&A get together with Bob "Ninja" Porras. Delta/CIA guy. Thursday April 18,2024 (3 Viewers)- Latest: rbird7282
