CT does require an elgibility certificate to purchase a handgun
35 bucks
35 bucks
Where did HQL come from
- Thread starter welder516
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
- Mar 8, 2013
- 6,993
Welder516, we all tire of the snarkiness but I doubt GTO actually meant “you.” I’d take a friend and advocate like you seven days a week and 5 times on MUMs if I had the chance. You are the real deal - committed - not just some of the noise that unfortunately comes with participating in this forum.
Ditto for me... what he said X10.
Short version: From a bunch of left wing a$$holes....
For comparison, NC (where I'm from) has Pistol Purchase Permits, go to your sheriff's office, fill out a form, they do a background check, about a week later you get up to 5 "coupons" allowing you to buy a pistol, cash and carry. You can then go again, get 5 more, etc. However, if you get a Concealed License (shall issue!), no pistol purchase permits necessary. Show the FFL/dealer your CHL, cash and carry.
Last edited:
Biggfoot44
Ultimate Member
- Aug 2, 2009
- 33,217
NC , depending on the County and individual Sheriff ranges from several weeks , to about 10minutes while you wait .
**********
Re : Firearm Supression Act of 2013 -
Martin O' Mally , with the assistance of the usual suspects in MGA.
Long term inspiration- Joe Curran.
**********
And I also interpeted GTO using the context of the general voting public .
**********
Re : Firearm Supression Act of 2013 -
Martin O' Mally , with the assistance of the usual suspects in MGA.
Long term inspiration- Joe Curran.
**********
And I also interpeted GTO using the context of the general voting public .
Welder,
I did mean it collectively. I am sorry that I wasn't more clear. We are on the same team. Lets keep the fight where it belongs, getting the truth out! Maryland Laws suck and look to possibly get worse. We have more fights ahead of us. Lets keep slugging away.
GTOGUNNER
Okay i am done with my self imposed ban
I am sorry for my part in the fiasco , i don't want to be at odds and waste energy being upset at anyone here . We have lots of work to do and the only thing we have is each other ( i know sad
)My father always said to my brothers and I . "United we stand divided we fall"
I do wish we would have more people willing to put differences aside and do what is right for us , we need to fight the ones who keep wanting us to give up our rights and guns .
Again sorry i got mad and the way in which i handled things .
Being around the adults here can be refreshing.
Threeband
The M1 Does My Talking
armed_economist
Active Member
- Dec 4, 2017
- 429
The HQL process costs no small amount of money to complete, but it doesn't bother me nearly as much as the ban on high capacity magazines and "assault style" rifles.
See you tonight brotato chip.Okay i am done with my self imposed ban2:
I am sorry for my part in the fiasco , i don't want to be at odds and waste energy being upset at anyone here . We have lots of work to do and the only thing we have is each other ( i know sad
My father always said to my brothers and I . "United we stand divided we fall"
I do wish we would have more people willing to put differences aside and do what is right for us , we need to fight the ones who keep wanting us to give up our rights and guns .
Again sorry i got mad and the way in which i handled things .
2:Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Biggfoot44
Ultimate Member
- Aug 2, 2009
- 33,217
@ Post #32 ;
I seethe over both , but I would probably put the HQL slightly ahead in evilness . Barrier for the totality vs partial restrictions of a catagory. But it can certainly be debated either way .
I seethe over both , but I would probably put the HQL slightly ahead in evilness . Barrier for the totality vs partial restrictions of a catagory. But it can certainly be debated either way .
As would I.
Arguably in my mind at least, the greatest evil inherent to the HQL is the likelihood of an absolutely false perception developing with the passage of time----that it's somehow supposed to be this way.
rob-cubed
In need of moderation
Death by a thousand papercuts...
Everything MD has passed has been largely copying other state's laws that have passed Federal scrutiny. And none of it has had an impact on crime. The politicians know it, and we know it, though the general public probably has no clue.
But then none of this has ever REALLY been about preventing gun crime to begin with. It's gun prohibition under the guise of "we did something".
Everything MD has passed has been largely copying other state's laws that have passed Federal scrutiny. And none of it has had an impact on crime. The politicians know it, and we know it, though the general public probably has no clue.
But then none of this has ever REALLY been about preventing gun crime to begin with. It's gun prohibition under the guise of "we did something".
This is a great way to explain it and falls in line with what I believe in whole .
Very well said .
bobb10010x
Member
The HQL came from that fool O'Malley and his butt buddy Frosh (current sitting A.G.). The primary purpose was to align O'Malley for a presidential run (we know how that turned out) and a secondary purpose was to line Frosh's pockets. Frosh has a law practice specializing (I've been led to believe) in criminal law, so if he can create more criminals he has the opportunity to have more clients to defend and therefore more money in his pocket(s). It's a simple power play fueled by abject greed on the part of both players.
bobb10010x
Member
There is no ban on high capacity magazines in Maryland, only restrictions on transfer and manufacture. Possession is not unlawful. Acquisition OUTSIDE the state is not unlawful. Returning to the state with magazines of greater capacity than 10 rounds is not unlawful. Use of magazines greater than 10 rounds capacity within this state is perfectly legal for all lawful purposes (i.e. personal/home defense, range use, recreational use, formal and informal target practice and competition events, etc.). You (anyone) simply can not manufacture or transfer a magazine of greater capacity than 10 rounds within the physical confines of the state of Maryland.
Think this pisses me off more than hql! Hate buying something with a 30 round mag only to have it shipped without. I’m looking into a mpx and mags for those are ridiculously overpriced. Stupid it’s not illegal to have them just can’t have one shipped with the gun I just purchased
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
Suggestions for a low powered, large objective rifle scope? (5 Viewers)- Started by E.Shell
- Replies: 1
-
-
Timonium Gun Show April 27-28 (Timonium Fairgrounds Exhibition Hall)
- Started by joro55
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
-