jaybee
Ultimate Member
Ronald Reagan said this 49 years ago. The man had a vision.
What a guy.
What a guy.
Reagan was a liberal.
The US looked like that 100 years ago. We're still cleaning up the mess. The EPA might be a bit overblown, but calls to eradicate it (and OSHA) take us back a bit too far.
I haven't seen a thought process this convoluted and self-serving since "we had to destroy the village in order to save it".
Its called systems thinking.
Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it...
The US looked like that 100 years ago. We're still cleaning up the mess. The EPA might be a bit overblown, but calls to eradicate it (and OSHA) take us back a bit too far.
I want cheap lead, but I don't want to get it at the expense of someone's health. The only person I want to kill with my bullet is the threat who didn't stop otherwise.
Now FFS leave some .22LR on the shelves for me.
Lead is a pretty dense, malleable, non-radioactive, and common metal. Any others in the running to replace it? I was thinking Au, personally. (/sarcasm)
Sure. Underpants Gnomes collecting underpants for profit is also "systems thinking".
Perhaps you might actually show your work as to how eliminating environmental laws and regulatory enforcement of them will lead (heh) to a cleaner environment.
I don't want a cleaner environment. I want EPA TO DO REAL SCIENCE OR STFU..
Carbon is a pollutant. Table salt is toxic waste.
The list goes on. Want to be taken seriously do science.
The claim that there is no safe level of lead is the claim that the entire earth needs to be deleaded.
It is not my job to solve problems you invent.
First prove there is s problem
Then prove that your proposed solution is a solution.
Then prove that your solution does not cause more injury than it prevents.
Until then have a nice day.
^This
Take your insult and shove it. Once again, the EPA doesn't make laws; Congress does.
Secondly, move to China where no EPA-like government interference exists.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jan/14/beijing-smog-continues-media-action
Take your epa love and YOU shove it pal. Typical, pick and extreme like communist china and argue those conditions will occur here without the epa.
"Systems thinking".
Yup.. The claim is that the EPA is why china is like that..
We send our dirtiest industry there, since we over regulate here. KRP ignoring facts if you like. But facts are stubborn things. Far more inyrsdigent than you. The claim is that epa hurts the environment. China is the best example...
Facts are stubborn things..
You've still not demonstrated how eliminating environmental regs and enforcement will lead to a clean environment.
The only substantive thing you've posted, in fact, is your honest statement "I don't want a cleaner environment." You could've saved the bother of the rest of it, including your non-factual attempt to link some unreferenced claim of "no safe level of lead" to anything the EPA is currently charged with enforcing.
" the only safe level of lead is zero" -- discuss.
Then figure out why if the perfect is the enemy of the good you send jobs overseas where the 'good' becomes the 'very bad'.
facts are EPA policy increases net pollution-- by sending environmentally problematic industries to countries with no standards at all, killing jobs and increasing the use of energy in transportation..
Anyone whom cares about the global environment, and 'green house gasses' must put an end to the EPA.
Since they do not-- I conclude that their intention is other.