HR 38
184 cosponsors + 3
S. 446
36 no change
184 cosponsors + 3
S. 446
36 no change
Rep. Hudson to introduce Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act
- Thread starter swinokur
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
I disagree. More than 15 years ago we were told that about LEOSA. Only now are we getting thrown another bone. Is it going to be another 15 years?
We should demand what we want with this bill or similar legislation. It's not sufficient to simply say "we have to use incrementalism" when the increments move glacially slow.
I was sorely pi**ed with LEAA after realizing the only thing civilians got from supporting them were lighter pocketbooks.
HR 38
185 cosponsors
+1
S.446
36 cosponsors
no change
185 cosponsors
+1
S.446
36 cosponsors
no change
Really appreciate the updates swinkur, is there anything we can do to move this along or is there a certain amount of cosponsors we can then assume will move this to active?
truthfully no idea. someone more versed in the inner workings of legislation should chime in.
Fox123
Ultimate Member
They can cosponsor away, its up to committee leadership to determine the schedule, or if it even comes out of the drawer.
Unless you have G&S, it doesn't matter.
- Aug 29, 2016
- 763
Why would you think LEOSA would ever pave the way for anything for civilians?
It was LEAA's sales pitch for $$$ in the effort to get LEOSA passed.
- Aug 29, 2016
- 763
I never would have thought it would do us any good.
I'm kind of naive on that score, tending to believe gun groups until I don't.
- Aug 29, 2016
- 763
The thing is, law enforcement always gets special privileges, as agents of the government. It's not the same situation as a bill that doesn't allow non-resident permits to be used by a resident of a state.
Chauchat
Active Member
Hudson's bill will never create the so-called national reciprosity that many peaceful, arms bearing citizens of the Union seek even if it were to pass to the statutes at large.
there might be something if you were a minor at the time, but I believe that if you were an adult, that yes, your are prohibited from every getting one, even if you have g&s.
Yes I can dig it. Md is the king of f#$^ked up s#$t. I mean how is it possible for a person with not even a parking ticket to be denied. So even getting every single non-res permit out there you still cant carry in MD even if Trump passes reciprocity (which I doubt will happen).
jeffie7
Ultimate Member
For what it's worth you could always become a police officer. Minor drug use years ago shouldn't be an issue as long as you were honest about it on your background. Depending on county...
Want a gun as a citizen? That minor drug issue from years ago clearly makes you an evil person looking for a permit so you can run a major drug operation.
Weird how that works.
Want a gun as a citizen? That minor drug issue from years ago clearly makes you an evil person looking for a permit so you can run a major drug operation.
Weird how that works.
If the house version of the bill passes, you could carry in MD on a NR permit.
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
Clearance Liqui Moly Motorbike 4T SAE 15W-50 Street | Full Synthetic Motor Oil | 4 Liter (8 Viewers)- Latest: MaxVO2
-
-
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
Clearance Liqui Moly Motorbike 4T SAE 15W-50 Street | Full Synthetic Motor Oil | 4 Liter (8 Viewers)- Started by mpollan1
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
-
-
-