Muleskinner
Ultimate Member
I wouldn't hold my breath. At best it'll be another feckless opinion with plenty of Grey area for the legislature to keep giving it to us dry with a handful of sand thrown in.
MGA 2020 - SB0422 - Young v Wear & Carry Permit Holders
- Thread starter MJD438
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
I wouldn't hold my breath. At best it'll be another feckless opinion with plenty of Grey area for the legislature to keep giving it to us dry with a handful of sand thrown in.
danb
dont be a dumbass
No: they could not get away with this in DC given the circuit precedent.
This is exactly the kind of disparity that will drive the Supreme Court to take one of the half dozen carry cases being held for NYSRPA ( assuming that the NYSRPA opinion itself is not controlling).
Muleskinner
Ultimate Member
Like Heller that affirmed a person's right to bear arms... In their home or the other ruling whose name eludes me right now that affirm that a person had the right to own commonly used and commonly own firearms but did not give us a list of those Firearms so any state can decide on their own which Firearms can and cannot be possessed? Like I said feckless. There is only one ruling that the Supreme Court can make that will be meaningful to all gun owners across the country. And that would be a complete confirmation of the constitutionality of the Second Amendment as it is written. In other words no government has the right to infringe on anyone's right to keep and bear arms.. End of sentence no ifs ands buts or excepts and that's never going to happen.
Raineman
On the 3rd box
Pricing us out of the market. Its in their playbook.
I've been convinced for several years now that the only way SCOTUS is going to take action on one or many of these types of cases is to let them go "full retard" with these bills. Looks like Maryland and Virginia are in a "hold my beer" contest.
I'm already on the "3rd box".
I've been convinced for several years now that the only way SCOTUS is going to take action on one or many of these types of cases is to let them go "full retard" with these bills. Looks like Maryland and Virginia are in a "hold my beer" contest.
I'm already on the "3rd box".
Muleskinner
Ultimate Member
I doubt we will ever get to the fourth box. It's been decades and nobody has taken any action of the sort. We keep letting the Supreme Court make our decision for us and it's not enough. I see what's happening in Virginia and just like Maryland they are going to take every action they can to prevent the 4th box from ever taking place. And just like Maryland they'll end up close to 40 years down the road with infringement that they claim they can't live with yet they do.
imaoldcowhand
Active Member
- Aug 3, 2018
- 714
What does the “transport” part mean?
Muleskinner
Ultimate Member
I know this probably doesn't have anything to do with it but be prepared for fees and taxes what all sorts of stuff to go up. They have to pay for Kerwin somehow. That for billion dollars isn't just going to appear out of thin air.
RuralRifleGuy
Active Member
Senator Young must have read Lev928's thread. https://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=241113
Ranger Tom
Active Member
Possibly to get some Bloomturd money? Just sayin"...
- Apr 26, 2012
- 5,289
You may have hit on something without realizing it... could they be one and the same?
But if you are a "certain person" you are exempt from "certain training" .
Anyone care to guess who "certain people" are?
Anyone care to guess who "certain people" are?
I find it absurd that being a law-abiding American citizen, isn't "good and substantial" reason for a wear and carry permit.
buellsfurn
Ultimate Member
You may have hit on something without realizing it... could they be one and the same?
You beat me to it
buellsfurn
Ultimate Member
This
Mike OTDP
Ultimate Member
- Feb 12, 2008
- 3,324
Given the amount of tax I pay to the state every year, they'd require me to wear a sidearm if they had any sense.
RoadDawg
Nos nostraque Deo
- Dec 6, 2010
- 94,400
Umm...
Active LEOs are ALREADY required to train AND qualify every year. So... that’s just not even worth mentioning here.
Take it up with Senator Young...he's the one that sponsored this crap and asked bill drafting for specific carveouts.
I just sent him a similar email. I will tell you that when I sent emails regarding gun legislation last year to team 46, the only one to respond to me was Brooke Lierman.
I don't know if it helps, but I pointed out this legislation would primarily affect people in his district with less means, and disproportionately affect people of color.
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
-
Just want to thank the extremely awesome folks at Tyler Firearms (2 Viewers)- Started by GenoBluzGtr
- Replies: 4
-
-
Clearance Liqui Moly Motorbike 4T SAE 15W-50 Street | Full Synthetic Motor Oil | 4 Liter- Started by mpollan1
- Replies: 3
-