short of registering your parts and pieces how in the hell would they know when parts were purchased? and how would one register unserialized parts and pieces? this is even dumber than the fsa
md sucks worse and worse each and every year
Fire Call!!!! Dems attempting to ram SB741/HB888...
- Thread starter montoya32
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
short of registering your parts and pieces how in the hell would they know when parts were purchased? and how would one register unserialized parts and pieces? this is even dumber than the fsa
md sucks worse and worse each and every year
danb
dont be a dumbass
See below. Keep in mind, this bill also applies to binary triggers, "burst trigger system" and some other things.
Now, strictly speaking, binary triggers and cranks etc. are not NFA items. So no authorization is needed. Burst triggers you would need NFA stamp for.
Its not clear what the ATF rule will be, or when the effective date will be, or whether it will include cranks and binary triggers, and what will be grandfathered. ATF is going to have the same takings problem MD is.
No idea. This is a massively huge problem for the BATFE. They are in a real pickle here.
Attachments
Mike OTDP
Ultimate Member
- Feb 12, 2008
- 3,324
Kindly note that this bill assumes that there will be some ATF action by 1 October 18...which is definitely not a done deal.
If anyone on the opposite side is reading this...the smart move is to wait until the Federal situation straightens out.
If anyone on the opposite side is reading this...the smart move is to wait until the Federal situation straightens out.
sleev-les
Gata Needs His Gat
I can't help but laugh. So I would get to keep any binary trigger or bump stock owned prior to that date.... smdh... At least that is how I read it and why I had to ask.
danb
dont be a dumbass
Bumps stocks and binary triggers are clearly a problem in the murderhood:
sleev-les
Gata Needs His Gat
Bumps stocks and binary triggers are clearly a problem in the murderhood:
Didn't you hear? The thugs can now make the Hi Point side shot at supersonic, ultra death impact, thousand million rounds per second with a duct tape binary trigger on their gat. Mix that with the rusty hollow nuclear tip boolitz capped with diamond grills and you have the murder death incinerate kill shot.
The Bump Stock ban is now under discussion live on the House floor. Click the link below and and then click on the "live" button in the "House Session Status" in the box on the right...
http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/webmga/frm1st.aspx?tab=home
http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/webmga/frm1st.aspx?tab=home
Our reprsentatives are strongly opposing the Bump Stock ban on the floor in the way most bills are not debated.
An amendment to demand than any language of the bill be advertised was defeated.
Opposition now up to demand that possession not be criminalized.
An amendment to demand than any language of the bill be advertised was defeated.
Opposition now up to demand that possession not be criminalized.
amendment from a Cecil County delegate to demand that current MD bump stock owner's possession be grandfathered in....has failed on a floor vote.
sleev-les
Gata Needs His Gat
Can't get to the live feed here.
Amendment to lower penalty below prohibited possessor is now being debated...
I will transcribe as best I can. This is an audio only feed so i don't want to guess the representative rising to debate unless I am certain of their identity.
Raineman
On the 3rd box
Thanks for the updates. Sitting at my desk at work with no speakers.
Floor leader for the Democraps is Montgomery County Delegate Moon, who will now entertain any changes.
amendment to lower penalty to less than prohibited possessor....fails on floor vote.
amendment to lower penalty to less than prohibited possessor....fails on floor vote.
Delegate from Anne Arundel now questioning Moon on purpose of the Bump Stock.
Moon says testimony was that "owners want to feel what it is like to have an illegal weapon in your hands""
Moon says testimony was that "owners want to feel what it is like to have an illegal weapon in your hands""
sleev-les
Gata Needs His Gat
No worries. It still gives me a heads up. Can't say I'm surprised that all amendments seem to be failing.
danb
dont be a dumbass
lol.
Because I cant carry a revolver illegally in Baltimore and get the same experience.
Number of murders in Maryland in the last 50 years from bump stocks, cranks, and binary triggers: 0
Debate is over on Second Reading on the Bump Stock bill with all amendments failing.
Bump Stock bill now goes to a Third Reading--probably Friday or Saturday, which proceeds a FINAL vote on the House floor.
Bump Stock bill now goes to a Third Reading--probably Friday or Saturday, which proceeds a FINAL vote on the House floor.
Attachments
Raineman
On the 3rd box
Bought and paid for, just like 2013.
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
What would be the best Maryland compliant rifle I can buy for under $3000? (4 Viewers)
- Started by Tool
- Replies: 13
-
-
-
-
