Handgunlaw.us has it all. GREAT resource for anyone.
http://www.handgunlaw.us/
The gentleman that runs it is also a member here. Very nice guy!
Yes, he is, which is why I let him use a picture of my DC permit for his website.
Handgunlaw.us has it all. GREAT resource for anyone.
http://www.handgunlaw.us/
The gentleman that runs it is also a member here. Very nice guy!
Yeah, but when you go back to your DC office directly, where to put the gun? DC is pretty strict.
I wondered where he got that DC permit. now I know. I have provided several NR permits to Gary too.Yes, he is, which is why I let him use a picture of my DC permit for his website.
These scum bags will pass a Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act for them only. Screw you Joe Citizen, let them eat cake.
just like they exempted themselves from Obama care.
DEPUTIZATION OF MEMBERS OF CONGRESS
AS SPECIAL DEPUTY U.S. MARSHALS
The deputization of members of Congress as special Deputy U.S. Marshals is inconsistent with separation of powers principles and with the statutory language and historical practice governing special deputation.
May 25, 1994
MEMORANDUM FOR FRANCIS J. MARTIN
ACTING GENERAL COUNSEL
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
You have requested our assistance in determining whether the United States Marshals Service may deputize members of Congress as special Deputy U.S. Marshals. The Director of the Marshals Service is authorized to deputize the following individuals to perform the functions of Deputy Marshals: selected officers or employees of the Department of Justice; federal, state or local law enforcement officers; private security personnel to provide courtroom security for the Federal judiciary; and other persons designated by the Associate Attorney General. 28 C.F.R. § 0.112; see also 28 U.S.C. § 561(f) (authorizing Director of Marshals Service to appoint "such employees as are necessary to carry out the powers and duties of the Service").....
We believe that deputation of members of Congress is inconsistent with separation of powers principles and with the statutory language and historical practice governing special deputation.(1) First, deputizing members of Congress violates the principle recognized in Bowsher v. Synar, 478 U.S. 714 (1986), that Congress may not exceed its constitutionally prescribed authority by playing a direct role in executing the laws..............
Members of Congress presumably request special deputation so that they may carry weapons for personal security and not so that they may actually execute or enforce the law. Nonetheless, deputized members of Congress will have statutory authority to enforce the law. Moreover, the fact that a legislative usurpation of executive power may prove to be innocuous or inchoate does not mean that it is constitutionally permissible. Legislative intrusions into the executive sphere that may prove harmless in practice nonetheless violate separation of powers principles.
It is therefore our conclusion that the Marshals Service cannot continue to grant requests from members of Congress for special deputation. Please let us know if we may be of any further assistance.
Walter Dellinger
Assistant Attorney General
If yesterdays shooting does not get them off the fence about DC Gun laws or National Reciprocity then I fear nothing will.
I was screaming at the TV this morning as the anchors postulated about the need for increased security for all law-makers..... when they allow all citizens to be able to protect themselves, then we can talk about this. If this terrible event results in a personal protection detail for all lawmakers, and nothing done for the rest of the American populace, my head will explode.
Does anyone believe DC will deny a member of Congress a CCW for lack of cause?
I don't.
I approve of this post.Am I wrong in insisting that the feds, scotus, whomever, needs to simply affirm that the 2A is beyond the scope of states rights, & it needs to be ruled the law of the land. Nothing less will do. No compromises. Also, penalties for use of a firearm to commit crimes should be increased to address the idiotic utes of the cities. Very simple.