newq
101st Poptart Assault BSB
I watched a video about this while the debate for sb281 was still hot. It was I can't remember who put it out wether it was NRA NAGR or someone elese but, this is what this is about. Its not nearly as stupid as you think. Deceptive , oh, indeed. Certainly not stupid if it does exactely what it aims to do....
The video centtralized around the Artful deception of smoke screening the real agenda. For example the given bill would:
1.Ban sales of automatic assault weapons manufactured after 1986
2.Extended background checks for all gun transfers and (a national registry)
3.Mental health requirements for future transfers
4.Closing the gunshow loop hole and require nics checks on internet sales
1.A smoke screeen to get the public on board,To the ignorant would sound sensible to the ignorant if it did not already exist
2. The agenda ,The crowning jewel is buried within the national gun registry.
3.Smoke screen as involuntary incarcerations for mental instabilities are tied to NICS (atleast for this example)
4. Smoke screen as its not a loophole and all dealers currently have to do background checks on buyers. Private sales will still go unmonitored.
The Smokescreen:
Legislators are smart enough to know that if a universal background check is front and center, that the bill will be disected quickly and admendments will pile on quickly and if rejected will be chewed up and spit out like a piece of bubbleyum.
Instead these proposals are drawn up and and even though there are 4 key points, swing states can maintain control by voting down the unimportant smokescreen and if they pass all the better. So the portions of the bill which are unimportant to legislators is voted down or stripped away and the real agenda which was always the key agenda sails through because well we already have background checks for 99% of all of these checks already so it gets little attention and of course (who cares we got rid of the other key parts of the bill). What was missed is the depth use and registry of the gun checks. Because the bills are not released prior to their introduction many legislators have little time to read the provisions of the bill and skimming the ambiguous at best nature of the wording in the provisions of the bill becomes arduous as backers of the bill want to disclose as little as possible. Instead it is up to legislators to "ask the right questions" about how information is used,orignated and kept.
Wish I could find the video as it did alot better job than I did of explaining in shorter detail the above afformentioned.
The video centtralized around the Artful deception of smoke screening the real agenda. For example the given bill would:
1.Ban sales of automatic assault weapons manufactured after 1986
2.Extended background checks for all gun transfers and (a national registry)
3.Mental health requirements for future transfers
4.Closing the gunshow loop hole and require nics checks on internet sales
1.A smoke screeen to get the public on board,To the ignorant would sound sensible to the ignorant if it did not already exist
2. The agenda ,The crowning jewel is buried within the national gun registry.
3.Smoke screen as involuntary incarcerations for mental instabilities are tied to NICS (atleast for this example)
4. Smoke screen as its not a loophole and all dealers currently have to do background checks on buyers. Private sales will still go unmonitored.
The Smokescreen:
Legislators are smart enough to know that if a universal background check is front and center, that the bill will be disected quickly and admendments will pile on quickly and if rejected will be chewed up and spit out like a piece of bubbleyum.
Instead these proposals are drawn up and and even though there are 4 key points, swing states can maintain control by voting down the unimportant smokescreen and if they pass all the better. So the portions of the bill which are unimportant to legislators is voted down or stripped away and the real agenda which was always the key agenda sails through because well we already have background checks for 99% of all of these checks already so it gets little attention and of course (who cares we got rid of the other key parts of the bill). What was missed is the depth use and registry of the gun checks. Because the bills are not released prior to their introduction many legislators have little time to read the provisions of the bill and skimming the ambiguous at best nature of the wording in the provisions of the bill becomes arduous as backers of the bill want to disclose as little as possible. Instead it is up to legislators to "ask the right questions" about how information is used,orignated and kept.
Wish I could find the video as it did alot better job than I did of explaining in shorter detail the above afformentioned.
