Red Flag in US Defense Budget

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Reptile

    Ultimate Member
    Sep 29, 2014
    7,282
    Columbia MD
    There’s nothing in the article except an assertion that the House version of the bill contains Red Flag language affecting veterans. The rest of the article explains what Red Flag orders can do that undermines Second Amendment rights.
     

    kolohekanaka

    Active Member
    Jul 23, 2017
    122
    Howard County, MD
    There’s nothing in the article except an assertion that the House version of the bill contains Red Flag language affecting veterans. The rest of the article explains what Red Flag orders can do that undermines Second Amendment rights.
    Gunpowdermagazine.com seems to be the only media that finds Red Flag significant. I can't find Red Flag mentioned in reports from other news outlet. Snopes.com and Factchecker.com have nothing about it either, probably too new.
     

    jpk1md

    Ultimate Member
    Jan 13, 2007
    11,313
    Gunpowdermagazine.com seems to be the only media that finds Red Flag significant. I can't find Red Flag mentioned in reports from other news outlet. Snopes.com and Factchecker.com have nothing about it either, probably too new.

    No offense but why bother checking snopes/factchecker with their horrific track record of lying/misinformation?

    Go to the source.....the article in the OP listed the bill number so go search it

    Section 542--Authority of Military Judges and Military Magistrates to
    Issue Military Court Protective Orders

    This section would authorize military magistrates and
    military judges to issue Military Court Protective Orders for
    the purpose of protecting a victim of an alleged sex or
    domestic violence offense, or a family member or associate of
    the victim, from a person subject to the Uniform Code of
    Military Justice.

    I spent 2 minutes and stumbled across at least ONE section that included protective order language

    https://congress.gov/congressional-...-report/442/1?q={"search":["HR6395"]}&s=1&r=3

    https://congress.gov/congressional-...-report/442/2?q={"search":["HR6395"]}&s=1&r=2
     

    dontpanic

    Ultimate Member
    Jul 7, 2013
    6,635
    Timonium
    No offense but why bother checking snopes/factchecker with their horrific track record of lying/misinformation?

    Go to the source.....the article in the OP listed the bill number so go search it



    I spent 2 minutes and stumbled across at least ONE section that included protective order language

    https://congress.gov/congressional-...-report/442/1?q={"search":["HR6395"]}&s=1&r=3

    https://congress.gov/congressional-...-report/442/2?q={"search":["HR6395"]}&s=1&r=2

    Can you quote tge section where you saw it. I just read the entire second link and there was nothing.
    The first link would not open past the title page.

    The trick to using Snopes and Factchecker is to look through the sources thet used to come to thier conclusion. They get it right a whole lot more than they get it wrong.
     

    jpk1md

    Ultimate Member
    Jan 13, 2007
    11,313
    Can you quote tge section where you saw it. I just read the entire second link and there was nothing.
    The first link would not open past the title page.

    The trick to using Snopes and Factchecker is to look through the sources thet used to come to thier conclusion. They get it right a whole lot more than they get it wrong.

    Wow....stunned.....did you not bother to read the post you quoted?

    Section 542--Authority of Military Judges and Military Magistrates to
    Issue Military Court Protective Orders

    This section would authorize military magistrates and
    military judges to issue Military Court Protective Orders for
    the purpose of protecting a victim of an alleged sex or
    domestic violence offense, or a family member or associate of
    the victim, from a person subject to the Uniform Code of
    Military Justice.
     

    Glaron

    Camp pureblood 13R
    BANNED!!!
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 20, 2013
    12,752
    Virginia
    Gunowners.org verifies.

    https://gunowners.org/na07292020/

    The House-passed Gun Confiscation Orders (GCOs) apply to persons subject to the United States Code of Military Justice. But, for them, it would be worse in many ways than the “red flag” GCO programs drafted in state legislatures.

    The essentials are the same: a gun owner can be stripped of his or her Second Amendment-protected rights in an ex parte proceeding by an unsubstantiated allegation from a hostile relative who dislikes him or her. Experience shows that the confiscation normally occurs in a surprise raid on the gun owner’s home in the middle of the night.
     

    CrueChief

    Cocker Dad/RIP Bella
    Apr 3, 2009
    3,023
    Napolis-ish
    The sad fact is red flag laws are here to stay, I have no confidence the courts will strike them. They are for the greater good after all never mind that pesky COTUS thing.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,323
    Messages
    7,277,232
    Members
    33,436
    Latest member
    DominicM

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom