Call Hogan's office and demand he veto SB1000

ComeGet · Apr 23, 2019

BeoBill said:
Any news yet?

He's too busy "information gathering" in NH and 26 other states to bother with us right now. Heard him on C-Span just a little while ago.

fidelity · Apr 23, 2019

ComeGet said:
He's too busy "information gathering" in NH and 26 other states to bother with us right now. Heard him on C-Span just a little while ago.

He's jealous of Bill Weld. I wouldn't be surprised if Hogan ran this time. He won't beat Trump, but he'll establish a campaign network, get some donors, and get national level publicity. It will position him for 2024 no matter who's in the WH (*if* he could make it through those primaries).

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk

Doctor_M · Apr 23, 2019

Oh I can't wait till his Presidential campaign calls and asks me for money... will they get an earful.

Fox123 · Apr 23, 2019

Dudes delusional and so full of himself that he thinks his brand of ******** works anywhere outside this state.

j_h_smith · Apr 23, 2019

Doctor_M said:
Oh I can't wait till his Presidential campaign calls and asks me for money... will they get an earful.

I was a large supporter for his first campaign. I can't tell you all of the emails I've gotten since then asking for more money. I've replied a few times but they must not go to humans, so I just delete them now. As a matter of fact, just yesterday, I got a sweet little email stating that they miss my ~~money~~ support and want me to show my support by donating more money.

DELETE...

Bourbonstamps · Apr 27, 2019

that fat, cowardly ****ing RINO

GTOGUNNER · Apr 27, 2019

danb said:
Mance and Pena look like they are both being held. Probably pending NYSRPA.

HPRB is basically walking dead.

We wont know about Rogers v Grewal (3rd circuit carry) until after the veto. But, given the status of Mance and Pena, there is a high probability in my mind it also gets held or outright granted. Setting aside SB1000, Hogan should be preparing the MSP for shall issue. It will be quite a culture shock. HPRB is going away one way or the other.

That won't get rid of those pesky restrictions. Still need the HPRB.

Augie · Apr 30, 2019

Any updates on this bill, Hogan signing a bunch more today.

danb · Apr 30, 2019

List is here:
https://governor.maryland.gov/2019-bill-signings/

No one should expect any news until after the special session may 1.

rbird7282 · Apr 30, 2019

danb said:
List is here:
https://governor.maryland.gov/2019-bill-signings/

No one should expect any news until after the special session may 1.

Why, the special session doesn’t have anything to do with it.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JohnnyE · Apr 30, 2019

I just checked and SB 1000 is not on today's (April 30, 2019) list of bills to be signed.

danb · Apr 30, 2019

rbird7282 said:
Why, the special session doesn’t have anything to do with it.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It does. Any vetoes today would be overridden in the special session tomorrow.

j_h_smith · Apr 30, 2019

danb said:
It does. Any vetoes today would be overridden in the special session tomorrow.

I thought that the only thing that can be discussed or voted on was what was presented in the request (petitioned) for the special session. Since this special session is to elect a new speaker, then isn't that the only thing that can be discussed?

rbird7282 · Apr 30, 2019

j_h_smith said:
I thought that the only thing that can be discussed or voted on was what was presented in the request (petitioned) for the special session. Since this special session is to elect a new speaker, then isn't that the only thing that can be discussed?

This. They can’t just override a veto unless the special session is called for that purpose.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

danb · Apr 30, 2019

j_h_smith said:
I thought that the only thing that can be discussed or voted on was what was presented in the request (petitioned) for the special session. Since this special session is to elect a new speaker, then isn't that the only thing that can be discussed?

Every authority I have seen, including the MD constitution, says that the legislature can (and will) consider veto overrides at special sessions. That would include a later one to consider changing the gerrymander map, if that happens.

dblas · Apr 30, 2019

rbird7282 said:
Why, the special session doesn’t have anything to do with it.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Per Maryland Constitution, if he vetoes a bill, the veto over ride must be taken up at the beginning of the next session. So, if he vetoes SB1000 before the special session they have to take up the over ride as the first business per Maryland's Constitution, and it would be over ridden and become law immediately, as opposed to being vetoed and giving us breathing room for the several federal lawsuits to come to final rulings in the Supreme Court.

rbird7282 · Apr 30, 2019

dblas said:
Per Maryland Constitution, if he vetoes a bill, the veto over ride must be taken up at the beginning of the next session. So, if he vetoes SB1000 before the special session they have to take up the over ride as the first business per Maryland's Constitution, and it would be over ridden and become law immediately, as opposed to being vetoed and giving us breathing room for the several federal lawsuits to come to final rulings in the Supreme Court.

I’m apparently misinformed then.
So they don’t have to call that session specifically for a veto but if they call for any special session, the veto must be the first order of business regardless of why the session was called. Is that correct?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

GTOGUNNER · Apr 30, 2019

So we need to contact the Governors office for him to Veto a bill to save a board that isn't meeting any more?
And has vacancies that he , Governor hasn't filled?

Consider this signed by Lazy Larry.

dblas · Apr 30, 2019

rbird7282 said:
I’m apparently misinformed then.
So they don’t have to call that session specifically for a veto but if they call for any special session, the veto must be the first order of business regardless of why the session was called. Is that correct?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Per the Maryland Constitution, that is entirely correct.

ComeGet · Apr 30, 2019

j_h_smith said:
I thought that the only thing that can be discussed or voted on was what was presented in the request (petitioned) for the special session. Since this special session is to elect a new speaker, then isn't that the only thing that can be discussed?

rbird7282 said:
I’m apparently misinformed then.
So they don’t have to call that session specifically for a veto but if they call for any special session, the veto must be the first order of business regardless of why the session was called. Is that correct?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I've seen that very thing stated here and I, too, thought it was right. Thanks dblas for clearing that up.

:thumbsup:

Call Hogan's office and demand he veto SB1000

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

Ultimate Member

piled higher and deeper

Certified Mad Scientist

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Active Member

IANAL, PATRIOT PICKET!!

Ultimate Member

dont be a dumbass

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

dont be a dumbass

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

dont be a dumbass

Past President, MSI

Ultimate Member

IANAL, PATRIOT PICKET!!

Past President, MSI

Ultimate Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics