San Francisco and other major cities sue the Pentagon over gun background checks

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • wolfwood

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 24, 2011
    1,361
    So SF is suing the DoD to make sure they comply with federal reporting requirements on service members that are prohibited from owning firearms. I have attached a copy of the complaint


    SAN FRANCISCO (Dec. 26, 2017) — City Attorney Dennis Herrera announced today that San Francisco, New York, and Philadelphia filed a federal lawsuit this morning against the Department of Defense for failing to fully comply with its legal obligations to report information to the national criminal background check system for gun sales. Herrera released the following statement:

    “We cannot accept the level of gun violence in our country as ‘just the way it is.’ Twenty-six people being murdered at church can never be normal.

    Patriotic Americans did not fight and die on foreign battlefields for our freedom just so we could be gunned down in our schools, our theaters and our churches because it’s too easy for people who shouldn’t have guns to get them.

    The national criminal background check system is the backbone of common-sense gun regulations. The Defense Department’s failure to fulfill its legal duty and accurately report criminal convictions puts innocent Americans at risk. It is past time to ensure that we’re doing everything we can to keep guns out of the wrong hands.”

    Background

    The military is required to provide information on dishonorable discharges and criminal convictions that prevent individuals from legally buying or possessing guns to the FBI’s national criminal background check system. The system is used by gun dealers to determine if an individually is legally allowed to purchase a firearm. Law enforcement also uses the system when processing applications for permits to possess or carry guns and to ensure that seized guns are not returned to anyone prohibited from owning them.

    The Defense Department has failed to properly report convictions and dishonorable discharges for at least two decades.

    The Air Force’s documented failure to report disqualifying records allowed the perpetrator of November’s church shooting in Sutherland Springs, Texas, to pass a background check, buy an assault rifle, and murder 26 innocent people there.

    Earlier this month the department’s acting inspector general released a report, detailing the defendants’ ongoing non-compliance with their reporting obligations. Across all the service branches, the report indicated, fully 31 percent of all final disposition reports were never provided to the FBI during the period from Jan. 1, 2015 to Dec. 31, 2016.

    The lawsuit seeks a court injunction and judicial oversight to ensure ongoing compliance with the Defense Department’s obligations to submit records to the FBI for inclusion in the background check system.

    The lawsuit was filed by San Francisco, New York, and Philadelphia in coordination with the law firm Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, which worked with Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence to develop the case.

    The lawsuit was brought against the Department of Defense, the Army, Navy and Air Force, the secretary of defense, the secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, and the directors of the Defense Department law enforcement entities charged with submitting these records. It was filed in U.S. District Court in Virginia, where the Department of Defense is headquartered.

    The case is: The City of New York v. The United States Department of Defense, et al., filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Additional documentation from the case is available on the City Attorney’s website at:sfcityattorney.org
     

    Attachments

    • New York v. U.S. Department of Defense..pdf
      131 KB · Views: 225

    Jim12

    Let Freedom Ring
    MDS Supporter
    Jan 30, 2013
    34,023
    San Francisco?

    The sanctuary city that openly violates federal laws that it doesn't like?

    The city where Kate Steinle was killed by an illegal immigrant who openly defied federal law but who was welcomed by the city with open arms, and who was defended successfully at San Francisco taxpayer expense?

    And New York, a once-great city now run by an openly Marxist sympathizer?

    Who are these people to tell anyone what to do about anything? And isn't the Pentagon already addressing this?
     
    Last edited:

    press1280

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 11, 2010
    7,911
    WV
    Yep, when the shoes on the other foot (illegal immigration) they don't want the Feds enforcing the law.
    I just don't see how they have standing to even do this.
     

    Mightydog

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    And now they want to use ONLY textbooks in school that give LGBT equal discussion. Books that ASSUME historical figures were gay. The one they just approved even states that killed astronaut Sally Ride was a lesbian, with no facts. Just fall off into the ocean!!!
     

    smokey

    2A TEACHER
    Jan 31, 2008
    31,497
    Heard that today. I wonder how that will affect the current national reciprocity bill. They sure don't mind spending taxpayers money to fund these lawsuits.

    Democrats always talk about how republicans should compromise on 2a infringements. Here's their chance for compromise. Pass national reciprocity and get the improved communication with nics
     

    smokey

    2A TEACHER
    Jan 31, 2008
    31,497
    Oh, I'd also ask them to look in to how often obama's doj went after people that broke federal gun laws(like straw purchasers)
     

    MigraineMan

    Defenestration Specialist
    Jun 9, 2011
    19,233
    Frederick County
    Democrats always talk about how republicans should compromise on 2a infringements. Here's their chance for compromise. Pass national reciprocity and get the improved communication with nics

    Silly rabbit, that's not how "compromise" works these days. (Maybe it used to, using the Olde Englishe definition, before the Progs co-opted the term.)
     

    Attachments

    • compromise_puppyface.jpg
      compromise_puppyface.jpg
      15.3 KB · Views: 194

    Adolph Oliver Bush

    Ultimate Member
    Patriot Picket
    Dec 13, 2015
    1,940
    Maryland is one of the states leading the way with not reporting disqualifying offenses to nics. Hard to sue when their house is so out of order....

    Can you provide a cite for this? Would make great fodder for 2018 legislative session.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,372
    Messages
    7,279,170
    Members
    33,442
    Latest member
    PotomacRiver

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom