Annapolis 1/15/20

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • knovotny

    Active Member
    Feb 5, 2013
    980
    Aberdeen, MD
    I find it the height of irony that the other side can use "Common Sense" in a broad discussion, but when I use it in testimony it is insulting to the entire committee, per the Vice Chair.

    Yea, she got unreasonably "insulted" by that. considering they label all proposed laws from their side as such. Methinks that was just an excuse to shut you up.
     

    teratos

    My hair is amazing
    MDS Supporter
    Patriot Picket
    Jan 22, 2009
    59,827
    Bel Air
    I find it the height of irony that the other side can use "Common Sense" in a broad discussion, but when I use it in testimony it is insulting to the entire committee, per the Vice Chair.

    I think this is a request for us to use “common sense” as much as possible. That’s just ridiculous.
     

    MigraineMan

    Defenestration Specialist
    Jun 9, 2011
    19,233
    Frederick County
    I like the idea of taking the term "common sense" from them.
     

    Attachments

    • 2a_common_sense_01.png
      2a_common_sense_01.png
      2.3 KB · Views: 270
    • 2a_common_sense_02.png
      2a_common_sense_02.png
      4.6 KB · Views: 264

    shootin the breeze

    Missed it by that much
    Dec 22, 2012
    3,878
    Highland
    Need to use her first name. Someone like that likes the title. Using her first name would be a big insult coming from us little people.

    Shirts to wear while they’re in session. Show whenever she’s there. Using the example above, say something like, “Hey Vanessa, 2A is common sense!”, etc. or “Vanessa, common sense, common sense, common sense.”
     

    jefflac02

    Active Member
    Dec 28, 2016
    547
    I can do this. You just want the times listed by PowPow?



    59:40 -> 1:07:55 is her question/comment to the opposition panel.

    1:07:27 is the exchange where she gets governed by the chair.

    2:25:14 -> 2:26:20

    2:35:40 -> 2:38:46



    Yes please. I plan on hitting her on twitter and the book of faces with these videos. Exposing tyranny and fascism one video at a time. I really appreciate it.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     

    Not_an_outlaw

    Ultimate Member
    Patriot Picket
    Jan 26, 2013
    4,679
    Prince Frederick, MD
    I noticed Atterbeary's Twitter is "By authority the committee to elect Vanessa Atterbeary." I know that politicians are prevented from taking down posts on Facebook. Does anyone know if this applies to Twitter? I posted something and it is gone. I neglected to put up a screen shot. There were many pro 2A posts but I can't find any tonight. But, I am not skilled in Twitter.

    https://twitter.com/VAtterbeary
     

    teratos

    My hair is amazing
    MDS Supporter
    Patriot Picket
    Jan 22, 2009
    59,827
    Bel Air
    I noticed Atterbeary's Twitter is "By authority the committee to elect Vanessa Atterbeary." I know that politicians are prevented from taking down posts on Facebook. Does anyone know if this applies to Twitter? I posted something and it is gone. I neglected to put up a screen shot. There were many pro 2A posts but I can't find any tonight. But, I am not skilled in Twitter.

    https://twitter.com/VAtterbeary

    Should be illegal to censor anyone when using your official social media account.
     

    tball

    Ultimate Member
    May 20, 2010
    2,135
    St. Augustine, Florida
    The Moms Demand Action were very organized. A lady with single spaced listings of names and telephone numbers stood there and checked them all off. As soon as the doors were opened, they filled all of the seats in the gallery. Those of us who were to testify had to stand in the hallway. The overflow room was being used for a Delegates party for close to an hour after the hearing started. The Chair of the House Judiciary Committee mocked the 2 A supporters. He said where is everybody? He was right. We had very few people there to fight this bill. From what I have heard, it will get out of the House. Everyone needs to schedule a meeting with your Delegates and tell them how loaning a rifle or shotgun or receiving a loaned rifle or shotgun will get you up to 5 years and a $10,000 fine. This would make you prohibited from owning a firearm for the rest of your life. Stealing a firearm is a misdemeanor and is only a 6 month sentence. Stealing a firearm would not make you a prohibited person.

    You will not be able to loan a shotgun or rifle to a friend for hunting.

    Please meet with or at least call your delegate's office. Tell them you are against this bill ASAP! The Hearing took place, they are working on the bill now. We want to get them to take as many bad things out of it as possible, before it gets out of committee.

    It looks like the Senate is waiting for this to get out of the house to do their own version of the bill. We need to let our Senators know our displeasure as well.

    Please try to come out to the next hearings. With so few people coming out, we are looking like we don't care.

    If you don't do anything and we get screwed again, look in the mirror when you want to blame someone.
     

    tball

    Ultimate Member
    May 20, 2010
    2,135
    St. Augustine, Florida
    They don't care about the Constitution. Their goal is to take guns away. They know they can't get them away from criminals, so they do in incremental infringement on our rights each year. Look at California. They require the registration of so called assault weapons. They mock gun owners who complained about the registration leading to confiscation. One or two years later, they ban the so called "assault weapons" and require everyone to get rid of them. They later followed up with knocks on the door and seizing the firearms.

    We were promised back in 2013 that they weren't going to go after rifles and shotguns. They tried last year and are trying again this year. If we don't push back, we get screwed.
     

    teratos

    My hair is amazing
    MDS Supporter
    Patriot Picket
    Jan 22, 2009
    59,827
    Bel Air
    They don't care about the Constitution. Their goal is to take guns away. They know they can't get them away from criminals, so they do in incremental infringement on our rights each year. Look at California. They require the registration of so called assault weapons. They mock gun owners who complained about the registration leading to confiscation. One or two years later, they ban the so called "assault weapons" and require everyone to get rid of them. They later followed up with knocks on the door and seizing the firearms.

    We were promised back in 2013 that they weren't going to go after rifles and shotguns. They tried last year and are trying again this year. If we don't push back, we get screwed.

    Dems are far more bold. Back in 2013, the mantra was “nobody wants to take your guns”. That’s gone. Now they boldly say “Hell yes we are going to take your guns”.
     

    tball

    Ultimate Member
    May 20, 2010
    2,135
    St. Augustine, Florida
    With Bush, Miller and Zirkin gone, there is a new radical leadership in the House and Senate, this could be a very bad year for gun owners in Maryland. Bloombergs Ill Informed Moms Demand Action are out in force. There were only a few of us crickets fighting back on Wednesday. If everyone doesn't get involved, we will get screwed.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,372
    Messages
    7,279,169
    Members
    33,442
    Latest member
    PotomacRiver

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom