MONDAY 7pm Picket in Annapolis! - NOW REAL TIME DISCUSSION!!
- Thread starter Rack&Roll
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
YUP!!!
PLEASE NOTE TONIGHT’s NEW TIME:
Tonight we will meet at Lawyer’s Mall at 6pm because the House of Delegates goes into Monday night session at 7 PM, ONE HOUR EARLIER than usual; Senate meets at regular Monday night time, 8 PM.
Anyone who would like to eat at Mission BBQ, our dinner hour is now 5-6pm.
Dereks_wife
Member
Thanks! Derek mentioned it being a longer night tonight but I couldn't find the details on it. We will be there!
Derek
Si vis pacem, para bellum
- Nov 14, 2010
- 20,274
Thread revival ...
Gawd forbid had the Patriot Picket passed out Pocket Constitutions ... or that Young Americans for Liberty had held up Pro2A signs.
Young Americans for Liberty at Kellogg Community College v. Kellogg Community College
This happened four months ago, and was resolved in favor of YAL, but the similarities with the PP arrest in Annapolis are striking.
So ... WHY are Frosh and the State still standing in the way of justice ?
What is the difference between Lawyers Mall and the sidewalk surrounding it ?
Gawd forbid had the Patriot Picket passed out Pocket Constitutions ... or that Young Americans for Liberty had held up Pro2A signs.
Young Americans for Liberty at Kellogg Community College v. Kellogg Community College
This happened four months ago, and was resolved in favor of YAL, but the similarities with the PP arrest in Annapolis are striking.
So ... WHY are Frosh and the State still standing in the way of justice ?
What is the difference between Lawyers Mall and the sidewalk surrounding it ?
Gawd forbid had the Patriot Picket passed out Pocket Constitutions ... or that Young Americans for Liberty had held up Pro2A signs.
Young Americans for Liberty at Kellogg Community College v. Kellogg Community College
This happened four months ago, and was resolved in favor of YAL, but the similarities with the PP arrest in Annapolis are striking.
So ... WHY are Frosh and the State still standing in the way of justice ?
What is the difference between Lawyers Mall and the sidewalk surrounding it ?
How are the brothers doing? I miss their commentary.
They are standing in the way because it did not happen in MD so the ruling of the federal court does not apply to us here in MD... The fact that Frosh was investigated in congress for being a communist needs to be brought out before the voters and his feelings that the government shall rule the people and the people obay as well.
Can you please provide some references for this. All I can find doing a search was about his father being a lawyer that defended an accused communist. I would appreciate anything you can provide.
- Nov 14, 2010
- 20,274
I did find this, but more info would be appreciated if motorcoachdog can supply it.
The Family Business
Brian Frosh learned a lot about law from his father, a Bethesda attorney and longtime public servant.
Attachments
Last edited:
Hawkeye
The Leatherstocking
- Jan 29, 2009
- 3,971
Standing up to Joe McCarthy and his band of goons is a positive mark, in my book.
Opps I have major egg on my face and I am man enough to admit it. It was his father who was the lawyer to a gentleman who was before congress for being a commie sympathizer. I am sorry and please forgive me for making a huge mistake. I do think how ever he got his ah "views" about being a rabid anti 2A person from his dad and or family.
How ever I did find the following about our rabid anti AG from Wikipedia... Take it as you will. I will not say one way or another..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Frosh
In 2004 The Washington Post reported that an ethics complaint had been filed by Audrey P. Corsonag, M.D., against Frosh for helping to kill a bill that would have limited medical malpractice payouts. The complaint alleged that Frosh had a conflict of interest because of his partnership in a law firm of which certain members handled medical malpractice cases, though Frosh does not handle those kinds of cases.[53] In response, according to the Post, "Frosh said his partnership arrangement with the firm does not let him share in earnings from cases in which he was not personally involved. And to his recollection, he said, he has handled only one Maryland malpractice case in recent years."[53] Frosh also stated that prior to his vote on the bill he had consulted with the General Assembly's ethics adviser, William G. Somerville, who stated that Frosh had no conflict of interest, was "on solid ground," and under the law, could vote on the bill.[53] "We've got lawyers, doctors and insurance agents in the legislature," Frosh said, "and, to some extent, all of us have an indirect financial interest in this legislation."[53] The Post further noted, "Many lawmakers wind up voting on bills that could have a direct effect on their professions. Typically, legislators are asked to recuse themselves from debate only if a measure would enrich them personally, rather than simply benefit their profession."[53] In light of the facts, Frosh was not required to recuse himself and nothing came of the complaint.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Frosh
In 2004 The Washington Post reported that an ethics complaint had been filed by Audrey P. Corsonag, M.D., against Frosh for helping to kill a bill that would have limited medical malpractice payouts. The complaint alleged that Frosh had a conflict of interest because of his partnership in a law firm of which certain members handled medical malpractice cases, though Frosh does not handle those kinds of cases.[53] In response, according to the Post, "Frosh said his partnership arrangement with the firm does not let him share in earnings from cases in which he was not personally involved. And to his recollection, he said, he has handled only one Maryland malpractice case in recent years."[53] Frosh also stated that prior to his vote on the bill he had consulted with the General Assembly's ethics adviser, William G. Somerville, who stated that Frosh had no conflict of interest, was "on solid ground," and under the law, could vote on the bill.[53] "We've got lawyers, doctors and insurance agents in the legislature," Frosh said, "and, to some extent, all of us have an indirect financial interest in this legislation."[53] The Post further noted, "Many lawmakers wind up voting on bills that could have a direct effect on their professions. Typically, legislators are asked to recuse themselves from debate only if a measure would enrich them personally, rather than simply benefit their profession."[53] In light of the facts, Frosh was not required to recuse himself and nothing came of the complaint.
- Nov 14, 2010
- 20,274
Caution, thread-jack ahead
SETTING THE RECORD ON JOE MCCARTHY STRAIGHT
The verdict on the late Senator's anti-communist cause -- and the tactics with which he pursued it.
Read the whole article ...
I wonder how many of us are on Mueller's list today, or more importantly ... how many DemocRATs might be on McCarthy's list if he were still alive.
Maybe so, but he was somewhat vindicated years later with the release of the list of names in the Venona Project Papers
SETTING THE RECORD ON JOE MCCARTHY STRAIGHT
The verdict on the late Senator's anti-communist cause -- and the tactics with which he pursued it.
Read the whole article ...
Sound familiar ? Except that the tables are turned now and the left has exchanged McCarthy'ism for Mueller'ism.
I wonder how many of us are on Mueller's list today, or more importantly ... how many DemocRATs might be on McCarthy's list if he were still alive.
Hawkeye
The Leatherstocking
- Jan 29, 2009
- 3,971
No. The man was un-American as they come, and was a power hungry scumbag who used fearmongering to build his own personal power base by ruining people's lives. He may have been right about some of the people that he persecuted, but that entire episode is so shameful and against what this country was founded on and what it stands for that it boggles my mind that anyone who believes in the American system can look at what went on there and be OK with it.
Ah yes, my personal favorite, the "that's not what muh country was founded on something something" argument.
Frost is a power monger and has no need for the constitution. He is a political bully at best.
- Nov 14, 2010
- 20,274
Thread jacking apologies
Consider me your 'mind boggler' then, because that was the period in time when the left figured out how to win at 'the game' ... and they've been perfecting those tactics ever since using the same methods you abhor. All it took back then was a chain-smoking reporter to have a 'chat' with America to set things in motion.
Murrow Vs. McCarthy
Consider me your 'mind boggler' then, because that was the period in time when the left figured out how to win at 'the game' ... and they've been perfecting those tactics ever since using the same methods you abhor. All it took back then was a chain-smoking reporter to have a 'chat' with America to set things in motion.
Murrow Vs. McCarthy
I wonder if the Annie Lee Moss event really was set up by Bobby and Murrow
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
PG County getting some Liberty Doll love over a bill that would ban computers for minors (1 Viewer)- Started by jc1240
- Replies: 6