Oregon Governor Preparing to Sign Gun Confiscation Law

iH8DemLibz · Jul 11, 2017

5cary said:
Laws that allow asset forfeiture are built of possession of contraband or otherwise illegal activity. In this case, the guns would be legally owned and the only an "i gotta bad feelz" will be needed.

I see where there are parallels, but I don't think it's the same.

It's designed to have legal gun owners living in fear.

Fear of crazy ex-wives/girlfriends. Fear of the most minor of confrontations. Fear of Liberal/nutter co-workers. Fear of folks hell bent on revenge. Fear of filling out doctor or dentist paperwork. It's a huge Big-Brother skull f--king.

It's fraught with pitfalls and open to wide spread abuse. Again, written that way. Some gun owners may feel the need to sell their collection before they receive that ominous knock on the door. Other would-be gun owners may never make that first purchase.

If signed and made law, it will surly land at SCOTUS.

motorcoachdoug · Jul 11, 2017

so then the state house and senate members just opened themselves as well. Someone can go and file a complaint against a state rep saying they might harm or kill others and lets get their guns taken away.. they could come back and bit them in the a$$ otherwise oregon just opened themselves up for a large payout of $$$ this bill. Take it before a oregon district court and if the judge is a non liberal haha around portland they are all over the place but east like Bend,Pendleton,La Grande and Baker City,Oregon they could rule against the state...

iH8DemLibz · Jul 11, 2017

motorcoachdoug said:
so then the state house and senate members just opened themselves as well. Someone can go and file a complaint against a state rep saying they might harm or kill others and lets get their guns taken away.. they could come back and bit them in the a$$ otherwise oregon just opened themselves up for a large payout of $$$ this bill. Take it before a oregon district court and if the judge is a non liberal haha around portland they are all over the place but east like Bend,Pendleton,La Grande and Baker City,Oregon they could rule against the state...

You can bet your bottom dollar this will not apply to anyone in power in Oregon.

Peasants Only!

PS: Oregonians should have their gun collection appraised and documented. Ammo too. Post haste. Just in case they need to collect money from the state. And a lot of folks will do a cost/benefit analysis. To determine whether the fight is worth it. The fight may cost more than the guns are worth. Oregon is betting this will take place too. They covered all angles.

adit · Jul 11, 2017

5cary said:
I'm going to play Captain Obvious here...

How will this ever pass constitutional muster?

iH8DemLibz said:
Constitutional Muster.

In Oregon.

They proposed a similar law in DE this year.

http://www.legis.delaware.gov/BillDetail?legislationId=25942

In DE they get 2 bites at the same apple since the legislative session lasts for 2 years (January 1 -July 1).

pcfixer · Jul 11, 2017

I would like at least the SAF would file suit in Federal court. Yea the 9th circuit, but could hold some value of a legal stay.

Blacksmith101 · Jul 11, 2017

Someone should notify the ACLU...... wait it is about guns. Never mind.

Maestro Pistolero · Jul 11, 2017

Theoretically, a law enforcement officer could be the target of such an accusation and his or her career would be on ice.

frozencesium · Jul 11, 2017

iH8DemLibz said:
The really bad part about giving them the bullets first/ammo box is that innocent police officers will be in front of those bullets. Hopefully, many of them will refuse to carry out any unconstitutional gun grabbing orders.

And since the Oregon legislature felt the need to pass this law, they themselves should don tactical gear and go house to house demanding the firearms.

Let them eat lead.

To add insult to injury, these will be no-knock entries for the safety of the officers.

What could possibly go wrong?

frozencesium · Jul 11, 2017

Maestro Pistolero said:
Theoretically, a law enforcement officer could be the target of such an accusation and his or her career would be on ice.

Happens all the time already.

Getting a divorce? Have an ex-GF who's nuts? They just call up and claim the officer is suicidal, threatened them, brandished, got drunk while carrying, etc, etc. Instant desk duty while the department has to investigate.

pcfixer · Jul 13, 2017

Engine4 said:
"Their only option will be to" fight back!

Bullet box option.....

Under the bill, any person would be allowed to file a petition with the court for an “extreme risk protection order” against anyone else they happen to be related to, or living with. A hearing would occur within one day of the petition being filed.

^^^^^This! Difficult to fight against close family, friends you have known for years. Maybe time to "hide" your arms is a 'safe' place only Y know about.

pilotguy299 · Jul 14, 2017

5cary said:
I'm going to play Captain Obvious here...

How will this ever pass constitutional muster?

because they only have to worry about it if someone files a lawsuit against them.

nb4602 · Jul 14, 2017

Got that right ! Can you imagine door to door confiscation ? Seems to far out there ....

j_h_smith · Jul 14, 2017

nb4602 said:
Got that right ! Can you imagine door to door confiscation ? Seems to far out there ....

Do you how many times in my 56 years I've heard that when it pertains to firearms?

When you think the stupid has to stop, it just builds up for little while, until it overflows the boundaries of common sense and continues to flow.

rockstarr · Jul 18, 2017

was this signed?

good guy 176 · Jul 18, 2017

Jim12 said:
Oregon is just as wacky as California. Probably from the Californians who moved there to escape from the cesspool they themselves created.

Look at their two senators, Wyden and Merkel. Looney tunes.

Dead center, James! My Sister in Law and husband #1 (she's living with #3 presently) made their way from CA to Yakima, WA 25-30 years ago.

He represented himself as an ordained Presby preacher man, and we later learned that he had a record; eventually they divorced and both remained in the Yakima area. I never met that turd and would silence him if I ever did cross trails.

She's a confirmed Jesus Freak (one who uses god as a crutch instead of taking responsibility for their misdeeds and resolving them themselves) and she is totally incompetent as a money manager and was left out of her own brothers substantial will...he died unexpectedly about 4 months ago.

Those two are indicative of what gets loose and makes its way up the Pacific coastline...they tarnish everything in their path.

Lew-Ranger63

pcfixer · Jul 19, 2017

slybarman said:
I wonder what they would do if the word "gun" was replaced with "dog". The state can take your dog without due process if anybody alleges you aren't nice to it. I bet the citizens would freak the F out.

Or, motorcycle, car, house, cell phone and the list goes on.

j_h_smith · Jul 19, 2017

pcfixer said:
Or, motorcycle, car, house, cell phone and the list goes on.

And none of those things are protected by the Constitution. :innocent0

Nanook · Jul 19, 2017

Seems like some folks might think it's time to feed the hogs. Not me - I like peace and quiet and unicorns and social utopia. But some folks.

tourrider · Jul 19, 2017

racists.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

platoonDaddy · Jul 19, 2017

Now for the other side of the country: http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...military-personnel-chattanooga-terror-attack/

Oregon Governor Preparing to Sign Gun Confiscation Law

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

When All Else Fails.

Ultimate Member

When All Else Fails.

ReMember

Ultimate Member

Grumpy Old Man

Active Member

BBQ Czar

BBQ Czar

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

nb405

Ultimate Member

Major Deplorable

R.I.P.

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

F-notso-NG-anymore

Grumpy

Ultimate Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics