The point Mas is making is that the prosecutor is NOT under oath & can enflame a jury with nonsense even if you do use the exact ammo the police use. BUT, by using that ammo you may (or may not) take that one petty argument away from that prosecutor.
The prosecutor is there (oftentimes & no disrespect to the lawyers on the forum) to get a conviction (WIN) & not to seek the truth because the more WIN's will help their political aspirations.
LET's not forget about the media & how they will portray you "...he made his own ammo with special killer bullets, XTP penetrators, because he was seeking to kill someone. The victim, a poor innocent boy aspired to be an astronaut..." Sound familiar?
This is what I believe his intention is. I have herd this type of hype used to convict someone before. Like " he was using bullets specifically to kill someone " .
This way you can say that you are using them for the same reason the local police use them.
I have herd that if you take one of his defense classes and are ever in court because of a self defense shooting he will come and testify for on your behalf. Assuming you are justified.
Has anyone else herd this ?